W.T. Lamb Holdings Group Structure & Subsidiaries
Executive Summary
W.T. LAMB HOLDINGS LIMITED (company number 00447302) is an active UK holding entity incorporated on 31 December 1947. A reverse search of the public register reveals that it sits directly above eight active UK trading and property subsidiaries, holding 75% to 100% control in seven of them and a 25% to 50% interest in Nyewood Brick Company Limited. Upstream, the company's register of Persons with Significant Control (PSC) lists two active statutory PSC statements rather than named individuals or corporate entities.
What a Companies House Search Shows
A standard search on the Companies House register operates in an upward direction. When a corporate analyst or solicitor inputs a company name or number, the service displays only that entity's direct statutory profile: filing history, registered office, active directors, charges, and declared PSCs.
Companies House does not provide a feature or index to list downstream subsidiaries owned by an enterprise. Entering a holding company reveals who owns or controls the holding company itself, but cannot reveal the portfolio of companies it owns.
For W.T. LAMB HOLDINGS LIMITED, the direct public register displays the following upstream PSC entries:
- PSC Statement 1: Kind `persons-with-significant-control-statement`, notified on 19 April 2017 (no individual or corporate PSC named).
- PSC Statement 2: Kind `persons-with-significant-control-statement`, notified on 19 April 2017 (no individual or corporate PSC named).
Under Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006, companies must file official statements when they are taking reasonable steps to identify their registrable beneficial owners, or when no individual meets the statutory threshold of holding more than 25% of shares or voting rights. A manual check of the holding company's direct filing profile halts here, providing zero visibility over the trading assets or operating subsidiaries below it.
While filed group accounts occasionally list major subsidiaries in their notes, these filings are historic, frequently six to nine months out of date, and smaller or micro groups often file filleted balance sheets that omit subsidiary lists entirely.
What the Reverse PSC Search Reveals
To establish the full group footprint, Corp Intel analyses the entire UK PSC register and reverses the ownership relationships. By identifying every active UK company that records W.T. LAMB HOLDINGS LIMITED as a corporate Person with Significant Control, the downstream corporate org chart can be accurately reconstructed.
This reverse query identifies eight active subsidiaries directly controlled by W.T. LAMB HOLDINGS LIMITED. None of these entities currently hold further registered subsidiaries on the public record, meaning the downstream group consists of an immediate single-tier portfolio.
Downstream Subsidiaries Table
| Company Name | Number | Status | Incorporation Date | Control Band | Own Subsidiaries |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| W.T.LAMB INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 00561323 | Active | 13/02/1956 | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| W.T.LAMB PROPERTIES LIMITED | 00823592 | Active | 19/10/1964 | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| HOLBORN NOMINEES LIMITED | 00257202 | Active | 18/06/1931 | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| NEWINGTON BRICKS LIMITED | 00089984 | Active | 28/08/1906 | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| NYEWOOD BRICK COMPANY LIMITED | 02304266 | Active | 12/10/1988 | 25-50% shares | 0 |
| LAMBS TERRACOTTA & FAIENCE LTD | 02751031 | Active | 28/09/1992 | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| CREMER,WHITING & CO.,LIMITED | 00198546 | Active | 10/06/1924 | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| W.T. LAMB & SONS LIMITED | 01704398 | Active | 04/03/1983 | 75-100% shares | 0 |
The group displays notable longevity, holding historical entities incorporated over a century ago, such as Newington Bricks Limited (incorporated in 1906) and Cremer,Whiting & Co.,Limited (incorporated in 1924). In seven of the eight entities, W.T. LAMB HOLDINGS LIMITED exercises direct statutory control in the 75% to 100% shareholding band, giving it absolute voting authority under special resolutions.
Who Sits at the Top: Governance and Officers
At the holding company level, the public register records no individual beneficial owner holding more than 25% of shares or voting rights, as demonstrated by the filed PSC statements. Operational control rests with the active board of directors and company secretary registered at Companies House.
Active Officers
- Mr James Robin Cardain Lamb: Director, born April 1966, British nationality, resident in the United Kingdom. Appointed 21 September 2001.
- Mr Jonathan Robert Lamb: Director, born April 1971, British nationality, resident in England. Appointed 21 September 2001.
- Mr Robin Antony Lamb: Director, born July 1938, British nationality, resident in England. Appointed prior to digital records.
- Mr Robert Graham Smith: Director, born August 1966, British nationality, resident in the United Kingdom. Appointed 1 February 2019.
- Mr Robert Smith: Secretary. Appointed 8 May 2017.
Past Officers
The historic record reflects several past appointments who have since resigned:
- Mr Robert Harry Simms Lamb: Director, appointed 1 July 1994, resigned 9 December 2020.
- Mr Brian James Brackley: Director, resigned 16 September 2004.
- Mr Richard Lamb: Director, resigned 30 June 2001.
- Mr Anthony David Salmon: Director, resigned 19 April 1996.
- Mr Colin Andrews: Secretary, appointed 19 June 2008, resigned 7 May 2017.
- Mr Graham Alan Jeffs: Secretary, appointed 28 March 2008, resigned 10 August 2009.
- Mr Keith Charles Speer: Secretary, appointed 16 January 2006, resigned 28 March 2008.
- Mr Ian Kennett: Secretary, resigned 16 January 2006.
For legal professionals assessing corporate control under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017), when a company has no registrable PSC with more than 25% ownership, compliance teams must verify the senior managing officials (the active board of directors) as part of their ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) due diligence.
Why Group Structure Matters for Due Diligence
Mapping a group structure chart is an essential prerequisite in corporate transactions, lending, and high-value procurement. Understanding whether an entity operates as a parent or a trading subsidiary determines legal risk exposure across several disciplines:
1. Contractual Privity and Counterparty Risk: Operating contracts signed with a parent entity do not automatically bind its subsidiaries. If services or materials are provided to Newington Bricks Limited or Lambs Terracotta & Faience Ltd, contracting directly with the holding company without a cross-guarantee leaves suppliers exposed if trading assets sit entirely within the operating tier.
2. Security and Debt Structuring: Lenders granting facilities to a holding company require clarity on where real estate and trading assets reside. Taking a debenture over W.T. LAMB HOLDINGS LIMITED creates fixed and floating charges over its own assets and shares, but does not grant a direct proprietary charge over the property owned by W.T.LAMB PROPERTIES LIMITED unless that subsidiary enters into an accession deed or gives an independent guarantee. Corporate teams should conduct a company charge check across every subsidiary in the portfolio to detect prior mortgages or negative pledges.
3. Insolvency Ring-Fencing: Under UK insolvency law, liabilities are not pooled across a corporate group unless formal contractual guarantees exist. If one trading subsidiary faces financial distress, a creditor or counterparty running a winding up search needs to ensure they are examining the precise operational entity rather than the wider group.
Step-by-Step Corporate Structure Due Diligence Framework
To conduct defensible legal or credit due diligence on a UK corporate group, follow this investigative procedure:
1. Verify Root Entity Status: Confirm incorporation status, registered address, and filing dates on the primary company profile.
2. Execute Reverse PSC Search: Query the corporate PSC records to find all entities declaring the root company as a registrable corporate owner.
3. Map Control Percentages: Categorise each subsidiary by shareholding band (e.g., wholly owned at 75-100% versus minority associates at 25-50%).
4. Inspect Asset and Charge Registers: Check each subsidiary individually for registered charges, mortgages, and debentures.
5. Review Board Overlaps: Cross-reference active directors across the parent and subsidiaries to identify common management controls.
6. Confirm UBO Filings: Determine whether an individual holds indirect control above the parent, or if senior managing officials must be verified under MLR 2017.
Manual Verification vs Automated Intelligence
Corporate intelligence professionals traditionally map corporate hierarchies through fragmented manual steps. An analyst must review annual accounts, pull individual balance sheets, cross-reference Companies House records, inspect The Gazette for statutory notices, and manually trace shareholding chains company by company. This process is time-consuming and prone to missing recently formed subsidiaries or entities registered under alternate naming conventions.
Corp Intel indexes the entire UK corporate registry and PSC dataset daily. Rather than relying on static accounts that may be months out of date, Corp Intel queries the live register downwards, producing an immediate, defensible group tree reflecting current statutory filings.
For Conveyancers, Lawyers and Lenders
Legal and financial advisers handling corporate transactions, property purchases, or banking facilities involving W.T. LAMB HOLDINGS LIMITED must verify the complete group perimeter prior to completion. Relying solely on root company records creates severe exposure to unnotified asset encumbrances, minority shareholder restrictions, and missed KYC touchpoints across operating entities. You can map the entire corporate hierarchy and download a complete Corporate Org Chart PDF at /corporate-org-chart for £25.
To ensure ongoing compliance and avoid missing unexpected changes, compliance officers should also establish free company monitoring across key group entities to receive instant alerts on directorship changes, PSC filings, and charge registrations.
FAQ
How do I find subsidiaries of a UK company on Companies House?
Companies House search does not provide a feature to search downwards for subsidiaries. The public interface only tracks upward ownership via the PSC register. To find subsidiaries, you must perform a reverse PSC search across the complete UK register or inspect the notes of the parent company's filed financial statements.
What does a 75-100% control band mean for a subsidiary?
Under the statutory PSC disclosure regime, a 75% to 100% control band indicates that the corporate parent holds at least three-quarters of the issued shares or voting rights. This threshold grants the parent full operational and constitutional control, including the unilateral power to pass special resolutions, amend articles of association, and approve major corporate restructuring.
Why are there no named individuals on the PSC register of W.T. Lamb Holdings Limited?
When a company's shares are dispersed such that no single individual owns or controls more than 25% of the shares or voting rights, no individual is registrable as a PSC. In these circumstances, the company files statutory PSC statements confirming that it has complied with its investigation duties and that no registrable person has been identified.
Who is treated as the beneficial owner when no individual PSC is registered?
Under Regulation 5 of the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, if an exhaustive search fails to identify an individual holding more than 25% of the entity, regulated firms (such as banks, solicitors, and auditors) must verify the company's senior managing officials, which generally comprises the active board of directors.
Does owning shares in a company make a parent liable for subsidiary debts?
Under the principle of corporate legal personality, UK companies maintain separate legal liability from their shareholders. A parent company is not automatically liable for the debts or contractual breaches of its subsidiaries unless it has provided an express parent company guarantee, entered into an indemnity, or created joint liability under contract.