Woodville Consultants Limited: ICC Interim Hearing Listed (CR-2026-005434)
When a corporate entity appears on the Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) cause list, counterparties face an immediate compliance and credit risk. Under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of a company's property made after the presentation of a winding-up petition is void if a winding-up order is subsequently made, unless validated by the court.
Woodville Consultants Limited (company number 08093201) is currently subject to proceedings under case reference CR-2026-005434. The matter is listed for an interim hearing at the Rolls Building, London, on 16 July 2026. For lenders, trade suppliers, and corporate finance advisers engaged with this entity, this listing requires immediate review.
Hearing Details
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Woodville Consultants Limited |
| Company Number | 08093201 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-005434 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) |
| Venue | The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London, Court 4 |
| Date | 16 July 2026 |
| Time | 10:30 am |
| List Type | ICC Interim List |
Corporate Profile and Expert Analysis
Incorporated on 1 June 2012, Woodville Consultants Limited operates from a registered office at 5 Gelliwastad Road, Pontypridd, Wales, CF37 2BP. The Companies House register classifies its primary activity under SIC code 70221 (financial management consultancy).
An appearance on the ICC interim list does not automatically indicate that a winding-up order will be granted. Interim hearings frequently deal with procedural applications. For example, a company disputing the underlying debt may apply for an injunction to restrain the petitioner from advertising the petition in The Gazette. Alternatively, the hearing may address requests for adjournments or validation orders to allow the company to continue trading and paying staff while the dispute is resolved.
If the petitioning creditor reaches a settlement with the company before the hearing, the petition is not automatically dismissed. Other creditors who are owed money can file a notice of intention to appear and apply to be substituted as the petitioner. This prevents the company from simply paying off the loudest creditor while ignoring the rest.
However, the existence of the petition alone triggers severe banking consequences. High street banks monitor court lists and Gazette notices rigorously. Upon discovering a petition, banks typically freeze the company's accounts to avoid liability for facilitating void dispositions under s.127.
Scenario: The s.127 Clawback Risk
Consider a composite scenario based on standard insolvency practice. A software provider supplies critical IT infrastructure to a financial consultancy. The consultancy pays a £15,000 invoice three weeks after a winding-up petition is presented by HMRC, but before the petition is advertised or heard.
If the court eventually makes a winding-up order, the liquidator will review all payments made post-petition. The £15,000 payment to the software provider constitutes a void disposition. The liquidator will demand repayment of the £15,000, forcing the supplier to return the funds and join the ranks of unsecured creditors for the debt. This illustrates why early detection of petitions is critical for credit controllers.
Creditor Decision Framework
Professionals exposed to a company facing a winding-up petition must act swiftly to protect their position. Execute the following steps:
1. Halt unsecured credit: Immediately suspend any ongoing supply of goods or services on credit terms to prevent further exposure.
2. Review security interests: Run a company charge check to determine if your debt, or the debt of other lenders, is secured by a fixed or floating charge. Secured creditors hold priority over unsecured claims.
3. Quarantine post-petition payments: Identify any payments received from the company after the petition presentation date. Ring-fence these funds, as they may be subject to liquidator clawback.
4. Assess petition status: Conduct a winding up petition search to verify if the petition has been advertised, dismissed, or supported by other creditors.
5. Consider legal representation: If you are a significant creditor, instruct solicitors to file a notice of intention to appear at the hearing, allowing you to support or oppose the petition.
Modernising Petition Discovery
Historically, tracking insolvency risk required manual, daily checks. Solicitors and credit managers would call the Central Registry of Winding Up Petitions (CRWUP) or manually scan PDF cause lists published late each afternoon. This reactive approach leaves a dangerous gap between a petition being presented and a creditor becoming aware of it, during which s.127 risks multiply.
Corp Intel replaces this manual burden with automated intelligence. By implementing free company monitoring, professionals receive immediate alerts when a monitored entity appears on a court cause list, files a new charge, or triggers a Gazette notice. This ensures credit teams can freeze facilities and legal advisers can prepare representation days or weeks before the wider market reacts.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.