Winding Up Petition Listing: Ada Care Limited
The High Court of Justice (Chancery Division, Companies Court) listed a winding-up petition hearing involving ADA CARE LIMITED (Company Number 06452420) for 12:00 pm on 2 September 2026. The listing occurred before a High Court judge at the Rolls Building, Court 1, London, under case reference CR-2026-005541. The entry appeared on the daily winding-up petitions list today as part of the cause list published on the High Court official roll.
Hearing details
| Attribute | Cause List Details |
| --- | --- |
| Company Name | ADA CARE LIMITED |
| Company Number | 06452420 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-005541 |
| Court | High Court of Justice (Companies Winding Up) |
| Venue | Rolls Building, Court 1, Fetter Lane, London |
| Hearing Date & Time | 2 September 2026 at 12:00 pm |
| Case Type | Winding-up Petition |
Company snapshot
Incorporated on 13 December 2007 under the Companies Act 2006, ADA CARE LIMITED operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 87300, which designates residential care activities for the elderly and disabled.
The company's registered office on record at Companies House is Regency Court Care Home, Thwaites House Farm, Thwaites Village, Keighley, England, BD21 4NA. Its corporate status remains registered as active. Financial figures, including recent turnover, gross profit, and net asset values, were not stated in the published court source data.
Directors and ownership
According to the official register at Companies House, the management history and ownership structure of the entity include the following details:
- Mr Deepak Patel: Director, appointed 13 December 2007. Born March 1973, British nationality, resident in the United Kingdom.
- Mr Waheed Razzaq: Director, appointed 13 December 2007, resignation registered on 17 July 2026. Born October 1969, British nationality, resident in England.
- Ms Jaishree Razzaq: Director and Secretary, appointed 13 December 2007, resigned 30 September 2009. Born January 1970, British nationality.
- Ms Shelley Syal Patel: Director, appointed 13 December 2007, resigned 30 September 2009. Born December 1979, British nationality, resident in England.
Under the Persons with Significant Control (PSC) regime, the register records two individuals with reportable control:
- Mr Deepak Patel: Notified on 1 December 2016 as holding significant influence or control over the company.
- Mr Waheed Razzaq: Notified on 1 December 2016 as holding significant influence or control over the company.
These register entries state factual appointments and holdings as declared in public statutory returns. No connection between these individuals and the presentation of the petition is asserted.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
No statutory Gazette notices were recorded in the supplied dataset. Under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, formal advertisement of a petition in The Gazette typically takes place after service upon the company and verification by the court, unless an order restraining advertisement has been granted.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
When a company appears on the court cause list for a winding-up petition, credit managers, healthcare commissioners, and trade counterparties must evaluate potential statutory consequences.
Under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of company property made after the presentation of a winding-up petition is void unless validated by the court. If a winding-up order is subsequently granted, payments made by the company to trade suppliers or service providers after the petition date may be subject to clawback by a liquidator.
To manage exposure effectively, commercial counterparties often follow a formal review workflow:
1. Confirm the status of the court case via the High Court cause list or by conducting a court register inquiry.
2. Review pending bank payment arrangements to assess whether validation orders under Section 127 are required.
3. Verify whether existing credit terms or collateral arrangements require immediate adjustments or formal security reviews.
4. Set up continuous alerts using free company monitoring to capture sudden updates, official receiver appointments, or Companies House filings in real time.
5. Conduct a verified winding up search before approving new credit lines or executing major commercial contracts.
For conveyancers, lawyers and lenders
Executing a comprehensive winding up petition search is a standard due diligence requirement prior to property completions, corporate acquisitions, or loan drawdowns. Failing to identify a pending High Court petition against a seller or borrower can result in conveyances being rendered void under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, creating severe title defects and financial loss. Conducting a verified court search prior to exchange or completion mitigates transactional risk and ensures full regulatory compliance.
How to investigate further
Legal professionals and risk analysts seeking further updates regarding case CR-2026-005541 should consult official public channels, including the Chancery Division cause list, statutory notices in The Gazette, and Companies House filings. Conducting an immediate winding up search provides direct visibility into court records across the High Court and regional trial centres.
FAQ
What happens at a High Court winding-up petition hearing?
At the listed hearing, the High Court judge considers submissions from the petitioner, the company, and supporting or opposing creditors. The court may grant a winding-up order, dismiss the petition, adjourn the hearing to allow settlement or validation, or substitute another petitioning creditor.
How does a winding-up petition affect a company's bank account?
Once a winding-up petition is served or advertised, banks usually freeze the company's accounts to avoid liability for post-presentation dispositions under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The company must apply to court for a validation order to unfreeze accounts for essential trading expenses.
Can a winding-up petition be dismissed before the hearing date?
Yes. If the debt is paid in full, disputed on bona fide substantial grounds, or settled between the parties, the petitioner may seek the court's permission to withdraw or dismiss the petition prior to the formal hearing.
Does the presence of a petition on the cause list prove insolvency?
No. A cause list entry confirms that a petition has been presented and listed for a hearing. Insolvency is a statutory determination made by the court upon considering the evidence presented at the hearing.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.