Winding-up Petition Listed for Caird Peckfield Limited (CR-2026-000006)

A winding-up petition against Caird Peckfield Limited (company number 02433065) has been listed for hearing at 10:30am on 5 August 2026 in Court 1 of the Rolls Building, London. The matter is listed under case number CR-2026-000006 in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (Companies Winding-Up Court). The proceedings follow a petition presented under the Insolvency Act 1986.

Hearing details

The table below summarises the core details extracted from the published court cause list for this matter.

| Attribute | Detail |

| --- | --- |

| Case Number | CR-2026-000006 |

| Company Name | CAIRD PECKFIELD LIMITED |

| Company Number | 02433065 |

| Court Division | High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts (Companies Winding-Up Court) |

| Hearing Date | 5 August 2026 |

| Hearing Time | 10:30am |

| Hearing Venue | Court 1, Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Buildings, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL |

| Case Type | Insolvency / Winding-Up Petition |

Company snapshot

According to public filings on the Companies House register, Caird Peckfield Limited was incorporated on 16 October 1989. The company's registered office address is listed as Peckfield Landfill Site Ridge Road, Micklefield, Leeds, LS25 4DW.

The business operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 38210, which corresponds to the treatment and disposal of non-hazardous waste. At the date of publication, the statutory corporate register lists the company status as active. Detailed financial filings, accounts, and auditor reports should be obtained directly from Companies House to verify historical turnover, balance sheet assets, and net liability positions.

Directors and ownership

Corporate transparency records required under the Companies Act 2006 set out the officer structure and register of Persons with Significant Control (PSC) for the entity. Commercial counterparties reviewing governance structures should inspect current officer filings, active directorships, and ultimate beneficial ownership entries held on the official public register.

Recent filings and Gazette activity

A search of published statutory notices on The Gazette shows the statutory notice history associated with the company. Under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, a petition presented to the court must be advertised in The Gazette before the court hearing, unless specific dispensation is granted.

What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties

The presentation of a winding-up petition creates significant legal risks under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Under Section 127, any disposition of company property, including bank transfers and payments to trade creditors, made after the petition presentation date is void in the event that a winding-up order is subsequently granted, unless validated by court order.

Practical risk-mitigation framework

Commercial managers and credit officers assessing trade exposure to a company subject to a pending winding-up petition should adopt the following structured response:

1. Freeze variable credit facilities: Immediately move the account to a cash-on-delivery or cash-in-advance basis to avoid generating post-petition credit exposure.

2. Conduct security reviews: Perform a comprehensive company charge check to verify whether existing debentures, fixed charges, or floating charges take priority over unsecured balances.

3. Review retention of title clauses: Examine existing supply contracts for enforceable retention of title (ROT) terms governing unconsumed stock on the debtor site.

4. Monitor legal updates: Establish free company monitoring to track upcoming filings, court updates, and officer appointments in real time.

5. Seek formal legal advice: Consult insolvency solicitors before accepting payments or entering validation agreements.

Practical scenario: Trade supplier exposure

Consider an industrial equipment supplier that delivers routine maintenance items to a waste treatment plant under a 30-day net credit agreement. If the operating company receives a compulsory winding-up petition, any payments received between the petition date and the hearing date risk being clawed back by a liquidator under Section 127 if a winding-up order is made. By verifying charge registers, assessing security positions, and converting supply terms to upfront cash payments, the supplier limits potential losses without breaching contractual commitments unnecessarily.

How to investigate further

To conduct due diligence regarding this matter, professionals should consult primary legal and corporate records:

Historically, risk analysts spent hours cross-referencing cause lists against Companies House microfiche and Gazette archives. Corp Intel aggregates these public indicators into a single interface, delivering instantaneous alerts when High Court filings affect your supply chain.

FAQ

Does a winding-up petition mean the company is automatically insolvent?

No. The listing of a winding-up petition indicates that a creditor has filed a formal petition in court alleging an unpaid debt. It is not an adjudication of insolvency. The High Court will evaluate the evidence during the hearing to determine whether to grant a compulsory winding-up order, dismiss the petition, or adjourn the proceedings.

What is the legal effect of Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986?

Section 127 specifies that any property disposition, payment, or asset transfer made by a company after the presentation of a petition is legally void if the court subsequently issues a winding-up order, unless the court explicitly validates the transaction.

How can creditors determine if existing debentures exist?

Creditors can inspect the registered charges section of the company file at Companies House. Conducting a formal review of filed instruments (such as Form MR01) identifies fixed and floating charges created over corporate assets.

What should a supplier do upon learning of a petition?

Suppliers should review outstanding ledger balances, pause further uncollateralised credit, audit goods delivered under retention of title clauses, and seek formal legal counsel regarding potential validation orders or court actions.

Disclaimer

This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.

View the company profile on CorpIntel