Winding-up Petition Hearing Listed: Oma Consulting Ltd (CR-2025-006482)
A winding-up petition has been presented against Oma Consulting Ltd (Company Number 11514260) and is listed for a hearing at the High Court of Justice. The case, reference CR-2025-006482, is scheduled to be heard on 10 July 2026 at the Rolls Building in London.
For creditors, insolvency practitioners, and corporate finance advisers, the appearance of a counterparty on the Chancery Division cause list requires immediate risk mitigation. This legal action follows the procedure set out under the Insolvency Act 1986, where a creditor seeks a court order to liquidate a company to recover outstanding debts.
High Court Hearing Details
The petition will be heard in the Companies Winding Up list. Stakeholders should note the following court details:
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Name | Oma Consulting Ltd |
| Case Number | CR-2025-006482 |
| Court | Companies Winding Up (Chancery Division) |
| Venue | The Rolls Building, Court 4, London |
| Date | 10 July 2026 |
| Time | 10:30am |
Corporate Profile and Control
Oma Consulting Ltd was incorporated on 13 August 2018. The entity operates under SIC code 62020, covering information technology consultancy activities. Its registered office is located at 1 Marshalls Close, New Southgate, London, N11 1TB.
According to the Companies House register, the company is currently listed as active. Public filings show the company has been managed by a sole director, Omolade Adeyemi, since incorporation. Control is highly centralised. Omolade Adeyemi is listed as the person with significant control (PSC), holding more than 75% of the shares and voting rights.
Expert Analysis: Statutory Risks for Creditors
The presentation of a petition is a severe risk signal. It typically indicates that a statutory demand for payment has gone unsatisfied for a period exceeding 21 days, or that a creditor has otherwise demonstrated the company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due under s.123 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
When a company faces a winding-up petition, the powers of the directors to dispose of company assets are strictly limited by s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Any disposition of property made after the commencement of the winding-up (the date the petition was presented to the court) is void unless the court orders otherwise through a validation order.
Worked Example: The s.127 Clawback Risk
Consider a scenario where a B2B software vendor supplies £15,000 of annual licensing to a consultancy three days after a winding-up petition is presented. The vendor is unaware of the court action. The consultancy pays the invoice immediately from its cash reserves.
Two weeks later, a winding-up order is made at the hearing. Under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, that £15,000 payment is a void disposition. The appointed liquidator will demand the software vendor repay the funds to the insolvency estate. The vendor must return the cash and join the back of the queue as an unsecured creditor, resulting in a total loss of both the service value and the cash.
Immediate Action Plan for Counterparties
For businesses with financial exposure to Oma Consulting Ltd, the listing of a winding-up petition requires an immediate review of credit terms and outstanding invoices. Credit managers and legal counsel should follow this escalation framework:
1. Exposure Assessment: Quantify all outstanding balances, unbilled services, and work-in-progress immediately.
2. Security Review: Conduct a company charge check to determine if banks or other secured creditors hold fixed or floating charges over the company's assets, which will rank ahead of unsecured claims.
3. Contractual Review: Identify 'insolvency triggers' in supply contracts that allow for the immediate termination of services or the reclamation of physical goods under Retention of Title (RoT) clauses.
4. Gazette Monitoring: Check The Gazette daily. Once a petition is formally advertised, retail banks will freeze the company's accounts to prevent asset dissipation, usually halting all trade.
5. Liaison: Contact the petitioning creditor's solicitors to establish the status of the debt and whether other creditors have filed notices of support.
Intelligence Gathering: Traditional vs Corp Intel
To maintain an accurate risk profile, professionals traditionally rely on manual checks of the daily HMCTS cause lists, cross-referencing these against Companies House filings and statutory notices. This manual tracking is highly time-consuming and leaves credit controllers vulnerable to oversight. By the time a petition appears in The Gazette, the company's bank accounts are already frozen, leaving suppliers with zero room to manoeuvre.
Modern corporate intelligence replaces this manual burden. Using a dedicated winding up petition search allows financial professionals to identify high-court actions days or weeks before they result in a formal insolvency event. Furthermore, stakeholders can monitor a UK company free through Corp Intel to receive automated alerts on new filings, charges, or court activity. This ensures credit decisions are always based on the most current legal data available, protecting the balance sheet from unexpected liquidations.
***
Disclaimer: This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.