Winding-Up Petition Hearing Listed for Mack&Marsh Properties Ltd
A winding-up petition against MACK&MARSH PROPERTIES LTD (case number CR-2026-005112) is scheduled to be heard at 11:30am on 19 August 2026 in Court 1 of the Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London. The petition was presented to the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (Chancery Division, Companies Court) under the provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986. The company, registered under company number 15873758, currently carries an active status alongside an automated proposal for compulsory strike-off on the public register.
Hearing details
The table below summarises the listing details as published on the official court cause list:
| Listing Parameter | Court Record Detail |
| --- | --- |
| Company Name | MACK&MARSH PROPERTIES LTD |
| Company Number | 15873758 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-005112 |
| Court | High Court of Justice (Companies Winding Up) |
| Venue | Rolls Building, Court 1, Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1NL |
| Hearing Date & Time | 19 August 2026 at 11:30am |
| Matter Type | Winding-up petition |
Legal professionals and risk analysts tracking daily listings via the official court roll or inspecting today's winding-up petitions list will note that Court 1 handles standard petitions listed for initial hearing or judicial directions.
Company snapshot
MACK&MARSH PROPERTIES LTD was incorporated on 3 August 2024 as a private limited company registered in England and Wales. The company's recorded business activity under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 68100 covers the buying and selling of own real estate.
Its registered office address is maintained at Castlewood House, Uttoxeter Road, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST18 0LP. Information accessible via the Companies House register indicates that the company is recently incorporated and has not yet reached a filing milestone requiring public financial accounts.
Public filings reflect an active proposal for compulsory strike-off. Compulsory strike-off notices are typically initiated by the Registrar of Companies under section 1000 of the Companies Act 2006 when statutory reporting requirements are outstanding or when there is reasonable cause to believe a company is no longer operating. When a winding-up petition is presented concurrently with strike-off action, statutory court proceedings take precedence over administrative dissolution.
Directors and ownership
Officers and statutory register data for the company are available for verification via the MACK&MARSH PROPERTIES LTD profile on Corp Intel.
Under statutory requirements set out in the Companies Act 2006, company directors must maintain proper accounting records and ensure corporate entries remain accurate. When corporate entities experience parallel registry enforcement and winding-up listings, risk officers conduct cross-directorship checks to determine whether related entities or shared directorships present broader commercial exposure.
Recent filings and statutory notifications
As of the listing date, no winding-up order has been granted by the court. The presentation of a petition is an application to the court and does not constitute a finding of insolvency.
Statutory advertisements, court petition dates, and potential liquidator appointments are formally recorded in The Gazette in accordance with Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016. Standard practice requires a petitioning creditor to advertise notice of the petition not less than seven clear days after service and not less than seven clear days before the court hearing, unless specific court directives apply.
Practical scenario: A supplier providing property maintenance or management services to a corporate landlord may observe an active operational status on primary registers while unaware of a pending court listing. Relying solely on annual accounts creates a visibility delay. Conducting a timely winding up petition search allows credit managers to detect active High Court listings well before final court orders are pronounced.
Action plan for creditors and counterparties
When a counterparty appears on the Companies Court cause list, credit controllers, lenders, and legal advisors should implement a structured review:
1. Confirm cause list details: Verify case references, petition dates, and listing venues directly against court cause lists.
2. Evaluate Section 127 risks: Review Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, which provides that any disposition of company property made after the presentation of a winding-up petition is void unless validated by court order.
3. Review credit limits and terms: Place trade accounts on immediate review, suspend unsecured credit facilities, and require cleared payment prior to delivery.
4. Inspect asset security: Review fixed and floating charges registered on the corporate file to establish existing security priorities.
5. Establish automated alerts: Enable free company monitoring to track subsequent Companies House filings, gazette entries, and registry updates in real time.
How to investigate further
Corporate intelligence professionals, insolvency practitioners, and commercial creditors tracking Court 1 matters should cross-reference primary sources:
- Conduct a focused search on court listings using Corp Intel's winding-up search.
- Search published insolvency notices on The Gazette.
- Review statutory guidance provided by The Insolvency Service.
- Inspect company filings and registry updates on the official Companies House service.
Frequently asked questions
What occurs during a winding-up petition hearing in Court 1?
During the hearing, the High Court judge considers submissions from the petitioner, the company, and any supporting or opposing creditors. The court may issue a winding-up order, dismiss the petition, adjourn the proceedings for further evidence, or permit another creditor to substitute as petitioner.
How does a strike-off proposal interact with a winding-up petition?
When a winding-up petition is presented against a company subject to compulsory strike-off under Section 1000 of the Companies Act 2006, court proceedings take priority. The Registrar of Companies typically suspends administrative dissolution upon receiving formal notification of pending court proceedings.
Why is Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 significant for trade counterparties?
Section 127 voids post-petition asset transfers and payments made by the company if a compulsory winding-up order is ultimately granted, unless the court grants a validation order authorising the specific transaction.
How can creditors verify whether a winding-up order was granted?
Following the hearing, court orders are entered on official court records, published in The Gazette, and filed at Companies House via statutory notification forms.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.