Winding-up Petition Hearing Listed for Kerem Naboth Limited
A winding-up petition against Kerem Naboth Limited has been listed for a hearing at the High Court of Justice. The matter is scheduled to be heard on 21 July 2026 at 10:00 am in Court 2 of the Rolls Building, London, under case number CR-2025-008239. This hearing follows the presentation of a petition by a creditor, a procedure governed by the Insolvency Act 1986.
Hearing and Case Details
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Kerem Naboth Limited |
| Company Number | 13619624 |
| Case Number | CR-2025-008239 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court (Chancery Division) |
| Venue | The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London |
| Date and Time | 21 July 2026 at 10:00 am |
Corporate Profile and Filing Status
Kerem Naboth Limited is a private limited company incorporated on 14 September 2021. The entity's registered office is situated at 9a Baynes Mews, London, NW3 5BH. According to the public register, the company is currently listed as 'active'.
Publicly available data does not list specific Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for the entity. The company has also not filed recent financial statements that would indicate its turnover, net asset value, or liquidity position. The absence of recent accounts often obscures the true financial position of a distressed entity, requiring creditors to run a comprehensive winding up petition search to identify if multiple parties are seeking recovery through the courts.
Statutory Implications for Creditors and Directors
When a company is named in a winding-up petition, it indicates a creditor has formally alleged the company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due, pursuant to section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986. For counterparties, this creates immediate operational and legal risks.
The most severe risk stems from section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Under this provision, any disposition of the company's property made after the commencement of the winding-up (the date the petition was presented, not the hearing date) is void unless the court orders otherwise.
Worked Example: The Section 127 Clawback Risk
Consider a composite scenario where a commercial landlord receives a £15,000 rent arrears payment from a corporate tenant three days after a winding-up petition is presented by HMRC. The landlord is unaware of the petition because it has not yet been advertised.
If the court subsequently makes a winding-up order at the hearing, the liquidator will demand the £15,000 back from the landlord under section 127. The payment is void. The landlord must return the funds and join the pool of unsecured creditors for the debt, effectively losing the money twice. This illustrates why early detection of petitions is critical.
Immediate Actions for Credit Controllers
To manage the risks associated with a pending petition hearing, credit controllers and legal advisers should apply the following framework:
1. Verify the Petition Status: Confirm if the petition has been served, advertised, or stayed by the court.
2. Cease Unsecured Credit: Move the account to 'pro-forma' or 'cash on delivery' terms immediately to prevent further exposure.
3. Review Existing Security: Conduct a company charge check to establish where your firm sits in the hierarchy of creditors and whether there are prior fixed or floating charges over the company's assets.
4. Enforce Retention of Title: If goods have been supplied, review contracts for valid Retention of Title (ROT) clauses and arrange for immediate inventory inspection.
5. Monitor Bank Actions: Anticipate that the company's bank will freeze its accounts upon discovering the petition, halting all outbound payments.
Traditional Monitoring vs Corporate Intelligence
Traditionally, insolvency practitioners and credit managers rely on manual searches of The Gazette or wait for a notice of administration to appear on the public register. They may also manually review the Daily Cause List for the Rolls Building. This reactive approach creates a dangerous exposure window. A petition can be presented and remain unadvertised for weeks, during which time suppliers continue to extend credit and accept voidable payments.
Using a service for free company monitoring allows stakeholders to receive automated alerts on new filings and court listings. By aggregating data from the courts, The Gazette, and the registry, professionals can act before assets are dissipated or competing creditors take priority, replacing manual checking with defensible, automated risk management.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.
To review the current status of this case or check other entities for pending insolvency actions, access the Corp Intel search platform.