Winding Up Petition Filed Against Oraca Ltd
A winding-up petition has been presented against ORACA LTD (company number 03750103) at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions under court case number CR-2026-007564. According to records on the court's public CE-File system, the petition was filed on 30 September 2026. The presentation of a winding-up petition is a formal legal step taken under the Insolvency Act 1986 and represents an assertion by a creditor; it is not a determination of insolvency or a court order to wind up the business.
Petition details
The table below outlines the core legal metrics recorded on the court docket:
| Attribute | Record Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Number | CR-2026-007564 |
| Target Entity | ORACA LTD |
| Filing Date | 30 September 2026 |
| Case Type | Companies - Petition - Winding Up Petition |
| Source | Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions (CE-File public search) |
| Petitioning Creditor | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
The petitioning creditor and the underlying sum claimed are not disclosed in public court cause lists prior to formal advertisement or judicial hearing.
Company snapshot
Official filings at the Companies House register state that ORACA LTD was incorporated on 9 April 1999. The entity's registered details are recorded as follows:
- Registered Office: 128 City Road, City Road, London, England, EC1V 2NX
- Company Status: Active
- Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes:
- 63990: Other information service activities not elsewhere classified
- 72200: Research and experimental development on social sciences and humanities
- 74909: Other professional, scientific and technical activities not elsewhere classified
- 85510: Sports and recreation education
Financial statements and turnover figures are omitted from the supplied source data.
Directors and ownership
Companies House records indicate that management control and ownership are held by the following officers:
- Mr Christopher James Nicholson: Appointed as a director on 9 April 1999. He previously served as company secretary from 10 April 1999 until his resignation on 15 February 2000. He is identified on the register as a Person with Significant Control (PSC) since 6 April 2016, holding between 75% and 100% of the shares and voting rights, alongside the right to appoint and remove directors.
- Past Officers: Historic filings record former directorships held by Mr Simon Philip Baker (10 April 1999 to 24 August 2005), Mr Thomas Charlesworth (9 April 1999 to 1 January 2010), and Mr Christopher Karl Todd (17 December 2001 to 1 November 2010). Historic corporate secretarial positions were held by RM Registrars Limited (1999), RM Company Services Limited (2000 to 2005), and Westco Nominees Limited (2005 to 2010).
Corporate registry records reflect factual legal appointments only and carry no implication of personal misconduct or liability regarding court petitions.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
No statutory notices concerning this petition have appeared in The Gazette within the supplied dataset. Creditors and legal advisers monitoring the entity should check daily updates on today's winding-up petition list to track court hearing listings and statutory advertisements.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
When a winding-up petition is presented, counterparties face immediate financial and operational risks. Under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of company property, including payments made from corporate bank accounts, made after the petition presentation date is void in the event that a compulsory liquidation order is subsequently granted by the court, unless validated by judicial order.
Step-by-step counterparty risk assessment
1. Verify exposure: Identify outstanding invoices, unfulfilled purchase orders, and active contract liabilities linked to ORACA LTD.
2. Review terms of business: Examine retention of title clauses, set-off provisions, and immediate termination rights triggered by insolvency actions.
3. Freeze credit lines: Pause discretionary credit terms and transition current orders to cash-on-delivery or advance payment terms.
4. Monitor public registries: Conduct regular searches on the court docket and public Gazette entries to identify listed hearing dates.
Practical scenario
Consider an equipment lessor who contracts with a commercial trading firm. Upon learning through a winding up petition search that a petition was filed against the trading counterparty three days prior, the lessor immediately halts new equipment deliveries. Because section 127 renders post-petition payments void without court validation, continuing credit deliveries before verifying court disposition status could require the lessor to refund payments received to a court-appointed liquidator.
For credit teams and suppliers
Credit controllers and commercial managers must act rapidly when a counterparty appears on the court filing dockets. Performing a proactive winding up search before approving major commercial contracts, extending debt terms, or releasing high-value assets mitigates the severe recovery risks associated with voided post-petition transactions.
Professional intelligence vs manual registry checks
Relying solely on periodic manual checks at Companies House often leaves commercial teams exposed. Companies House records focus primarily on annual accounts, officer changes, and confirmed liquidation orders, frequently lagging behind live litigation by several weeks. By the time an insolvency order is registered on the public company register, remedies under contract law may already be severely restricted.
Conducting manual cross-checks across multiple platforms, such as the High Court CE-File registry, regional court dockets, and statutory Gazette feeds, requires significant legal resource and operational expense. Corporate intelligence platforms streamline this process by aggregating judicial filings instantly, giving credit managers early notice before court petitions progress to formal advertisement or winding-up orders.
How to investigate further
To conduct further due diligence on ORACA LTD or verify counterparty status across your commercial supply chain, trade creditors can utilize automated tracking services. Establishing free company monitoring ensures automatic notifications regarding corporate registry filings, court entries, and official Gazetted notices.
FAQ
What happens immediately after a winding-up petition is filed?
After filing at the Central Registry, the petitioner must serve the document on the target company's registered office. A court hearing date is scheduled, usually between 4 and 10 weeks from the filing date.
Does a petition mean the company is in liquidation?
No. A winding-up petition is a legal claim presented by a creditor alleging an unpaid debt. The company remains active until the court hears the case and decides whether to issue a winding-up order, dismiss the petition, or adjourn the proceedings.
When is a petition advertised in The Gazette?
Under the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, the petitioner must generally wait at least seven business days after serving the petition on the company before advertising it in The Gazette, unless the court orders otherwise.
Why are post-petition payments risky for suppliers?
Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 makes post-petition property transfers void if a winding-up order is eventually granted. Liquidators can demand the return of funds paid out by the company during this period unless the court grants a validation order.
Disclaimer
This report summarises a petition recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.