Winding-Up Petition Against Redsky Rise Ltd
A winding-up petition has been presented against property development and construction firm Redsky Rise Ltd at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions under case number CR-2026-008522. The filing was entered on the court roll on 3 November 2026.
The presentation of a petition constitutes a formal application by a creditor seeking a compulsory winding-up order under the Insolvency Act 1986. Presentation is not a determination of insolvency, and the legal outcome remains a matter for the court.
Petition details
The table below summarises the entry recorded on the CE-File electronic court records system:
| Attribute | Record Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Redsky Rise Ltd |
| Case Number | CR-2026-008522 |
| Filing Date | 3 November 2026 |
| Case Type | Companies - Petition - Winding Up Petition |
| Jurisdiction | Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions (Insolvency and Companies Court) |
| Petitioning Creditor | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Petition Debt Amount | [Check the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Listed Hearing Date | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
Daily court updates from across England and Wales can be monitored via the daily winding-up petitions list.
Company snapshot
Incorporated on 21 April 2016, Redsky Rise Ltd (company number 10140015) is an active private limited company. Its registered office is recorded as Badminton House, 38 Marsham Way, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, SL9 8AP.
According to Companies House, the company operates under three Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes:
- 41202: Construction of domestic buildings
- 68100: Buying and selling of own real estate
- 68209: Other letting and operating of own or leased real estate
Financial data, including turnover and balance sheet figures, are [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor).
Directors and ownership
The public register records the following directorship history:
- Mr Tejinder Singh: Appointed as director on 21 April 2016. British nationality, resident in England, born June 1980. Current.
- Mrs Sukhvir Kaur Sekhon: Appointed as director on 21 April 2016, resigned on 24 April 2017. British nationality, resident in England, born June 1983.
The Persons with Significant Control (PSC) register shows three individual notifications:
- Mr Tejinder Singh: Notified on 21 April 2016. Holds 25% to 50% of the company's shares.
- Mrs Surinder Pal Kaur: Notified on 19 April 2022, ceased on 13 August 2025. Held 25% to 50% of shares.
- Mrs Sukhvir Kaur Sekhon: Notified on 13 September 2025. Holds 25% to 50% of shares and 25% to 50% of voting rights.
These entries reflect historical filings on the public register; statutory appointments carry no implication of personal insolvency or misconduct.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
No notices regarding this case have been gazetted in The Gazette in the supplied record. Under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, a petitioner cannot publish notice of the petition until seven business days have elapsed following service on the company, unless the court directs otherwise.
Because presentation occurs before public advertisement, trade creditors and counterparties relying solely on published statutory notices often remain unaware of the petition until bank accounts are frozen.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition triggers severe legal constraints under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Under this statute, any disposition of company property made after the date of presentation is void if the court subsequently grants a winding-up order, unless specifically authorised by a validation order.
When clearing banks become aware of a petition, they routinely freeze the company's bank accounts to avoid liability for void transactions. This can halt trade payments immediately.
Counterparty exposure assessment framework
Credit managers and commercial counterparties should adopt the following structured response when a petition is filed against an active counterparty:
1. Cease unsecured credit terms: Transition open accounts to immediate payment against delivery or cleared funds upfront.
2. Review retention of title clauses: Determine whether stock delivered remains legally identifiable and reclaimable under valid contractual terms.
3. Assess exposure under section 127: Any payments received from the company after 3 November 2026 could be challenged by an official receiver or liquidator if a winding-up order is made without a court validation order.
4. Audit outstanding charges and work in progress: Review contract stages, site deposits, and project deliverables to quantify maximum potential bad debt.
Practical scenario: Post-petition supply
Consider an equipment supplier that delivers £25,000 of construction plant to a contractor after a petition has been presented. If the contractor pays by bank transfer and the court subsequently makes a winding-up order, the payment is technically void under section 127. The liquidator can demand repayment of the £25,000 from the supplier, leaving the supplier as an unsecured creditor in the liquidation. Conducting a formal winding up search before accepting substantial orders mitigates this clawback risk.
How to run a winding up petition search
Legal teams and credit professionals historically verified corporate solvency by telephoning the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions or cross-referencing Companies House and Gazette records. These manual workflows carry operational delays; Companies House records do not show active petitions, and The Gazette only lists petitions after the seven-day post-service window expires.
Conducting an electronic winding up petition search directly interrogates court cause records at presentation. If you require formal confirmation for compliance files, you can [Get a Winding Up Search Certificate →](#offers-certificate). For ongoing vendor monitoring, companies can activate free company monitoring to receive automated email alerts on register changes.
For credit teams and suppliers
For commercial credit teams, construction project managers, and finance directors, unspotted petitions represent an immediate source of balance sheet write-offs. A standard company credit check or register review will miss court actions that have not yet been advertised. Running a routine winding up search before releasing retention sums or extending high-value trade terms provides an objective audit trail against void transaction risk.
FAQ
Does a petition mean the company is in liquidation?
No. A petition is an application to place the company into compulsory liquidation. The company continues to trade unless and until the court grants an order, dismisses the petition, or accepts a settlement or alternative insolvency process.
When will the petition be advertised in The Gazette?
Under the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, a petition cannot be advertised until at least seven business days after service on the company. If the company pays the debt or applies for an injunction restraining advertisement, the notice may never appear.
Can a company trade while a petition is active?
A company can legally trade, but it faces operational constraints. Dispositions of property are void if a winding-up order is ultimately granted, meaning banks often freeze accounts and suppliers may refuse delivery without advance payment.
What happens at the winding-up hearing?
The court will examine whether the debt is undisputed and unpaid. It may make a winding-up order, adjourn the hearing for evidence or settlement, or dismiss the petition if the debt has been satisfied or is disputed on substantial grounds.
Disclaimer
This report summarises a petition recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.