A & J Sectional Buildings Limited: High Court ICC Hearing Scheduled
Wellingborough-based timber manufacturer A & J SECTIONAL BUILDINGS LIMITED was listed for an Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) hearing in the High Court of Justice on 6 July 2026. Listed under case reference CR-2026-000766, the proceedings were scheduled for 2:00 pm in Hearing Room 8 of the Rolls Building, London.
Hearing details
| Field | Detail |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | A & J SECTIONAL BUILDINGS LIMITED |
| Company Number | 01817863 |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-000766 |
| Court | High Court of Justice, Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Hearing Date | 6 July 2026 |
| Hearing Time | 2:00 pm |
| Venue | Room 8, The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London |
| Case Type | ICC Interim List |
Company snapshot
Public registry records at Companies House confirm that A & J Sectional Buildings Limited is an active private limited company incorporated on 21 May 1984. The entity has operated for four decades within the timber manufacturing sector under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 16290, which covers the manufacture of wood products, cork, straw, and prefabricated sectional timber structures.
The company maintains its registered office and primary operational premises at 11/13 Edmonds Close, Denington Industrial Estate, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, NN8 2QY. This location serves as the main manufacturing facility and corporate address on the official register.
Directors and ownership
Statutory filings made pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 record details of beneficial ownership for the company. The person with significant control (PSC) register shows Mr John Walter Souster registered since 22 October 2016, holding between 75% and 100% of the company's issued shares and voting rights. These details reflect entries on the public register and do not imply personal financial standing or liability.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
A search of official notices in The Gazette shows no prior advertisement of a winding-up petition or statutory notice concerning the company ahead of this court listing. The corporate register records the company in active status without formal filings for administrators, administrative receivers, or liquidators.
Applications scheduled on the High Court ICC Interim List frequently involve procedural or urgent directions under the Insolvency Act 1986. Standard interim matters include applications for validation orders under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, applications to restrain the statutory advertisement of a petition, or directions hearings to set timetables regarding disputed debt claims.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
An appearance on the ICC Interim List signals that credit controllers and commercial counterparty risk managers should evaluate current trade exposure without delay. Under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, if a winding-up petition has been presented, any disposition of the company's property made after that presentation is void unless validated by the court.
Worked scenario: Commercial counterparty risk response
Consider a commercial timber merchant delivering raw materials to a specialist joinery manufacturer on 60-day open credit terms. When the credit team identifies the customer on the High Court ICC interim list, they immediately place the trading account on hold to prevent further unsecured credit extension.
The credit manager conducts a company charge check on Companies House to determine whether existing institutional charges exist over company assets. Identifying a floating charge held by a bank, the manager notes that unsecured claims rank behind qualifying floating charge holders in statutory distributions. The manager then runs a winding up petition search to confirm court filing details. Finally, a field representative is instructed to verify and mark delivered inventory remaining on site under retention of title provisions.
Action framework for credit controllers
1. Suspend credit terms: Switch active orders to pro-forma payment or cash on delivery until legal clarity is established.
2. Verify court filings: Perform a court record search to confirm petition presentation dates and petitioner details.
3. Examine asset charges: Review registered charges at Companies House to evaluate fixed and floating security encumbrances.
4. Audit outstanding balance: Reconcile unbilled dispatches, unpaid invoices, and uncleared bank transactions to calculate total exposure.
5. Enforce retention of title: Identify delivered goods subject to enforceable retention of title terms and notify the company in writing.
For conveyancers, lawyers and lenders
Solicitors, conveyancers, and commercial lenders must verify corporate counterparty status prior to completing property transactions, advancing capital, or executing formal agreements. Proceeding with a corporate transaction without checking pending litigation risks voided asset transfers or unrecoverable funds under insolvency legislation. Conducting a comprehensive winding up search during pre-completion due diligence protects commercial positions against unseen court filings.
How to run a winding up petition search
Gathering corporate litigation intelligence manually involves inspecting daily HM Courts & Tribunals Service cause lists, monitoring published Gazette notices, checking Companies House filings, and contacting court registries directly. This manual cross-referencing process can introduce delays, leaving commercial creditors exposed if banking access is restricted or formal orders are granted.
Automated risk intelligence eliminates operational delays. Credit professionals monitoring High Court activity can consult today's winding up petitions list or review the High Court official roll to identify proceedings early. Executing a fast winding up search delivers clear visibility over pending litigation. Establishing free company monitoring delivers automated alerts to credit risk desks whenever statutory filings, registry status adjustments, or court cause list entries occur.
FAQ
What does an appearance on the High Court ICC interim list indicate?
An ICC interim list appearance indicates that an Insolvency and Companies Court judge is reviewing a procedural or urgent legal application. Common matters include applications for validation orders, injunctions to restrain petition advertisement, or directions hearings setting court timetables.
Does a High Court cause list entry mean a company is insolvent?
No. A cause list listing confirms active proceedings in court, not a legal finding of insolvency. Solvent businesses frequently appear on the interim list to challenge disputed debt claims or to seek validation orders while resolving commercial disputes.
What is the legal purpose of a section 127 validation order?
Where a winding-up petition has been presented, section 127 renders post-presentation asset dispositions void unless validated by the court. A validation order permits the company to make specified bank payments, such as payroll or supplier costs, ensuring trade can continue legally.
Why do financial institutions restrict bank accounts following a court listing?
Banks monitor public court lists and insolvency filings closely. When a pending petition is identified, financial institutions typically freeze company accounts to prevent potential liability under section 127, requiring the company to seek a court validation order to unfreeze facilities.
How does cause list tracking differ from Gazette notice monitoring?
Court cause lists show scheduled court hearings immediately after filings are listed. Gazette notices generally appear days or weeks later following legal service and advertising requirements, making cause list tracking a faster indicator of court proceedings.
What immediate steps should trade creditors take upon finding a cause list entry?
Trade creditors should pause unsecured credit terms, evaluate total ledger balances, check registered asset encumbrances, run formal court petition searches, and enforce contractual retention of title clauses where applicable.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.