Turkswood Limited Listed for High Court Disqualification Hearing
On 28 July 2026 at 10:30am, a director disqualification matter involving Turkswood Limited (company number 01533330) is listed for hearing at the High Court of Justice, Insolvency and Companies Court. The hearing will take place in hearing room 10 at The Rolls Building in London under case reference CR-2025-003321. The proceedings fall within the jurisdiction of the High Court's specialist insolvency lists, which manage regulatory and insolvency-related applications across England and Wales.
Hearing Details
Director disqualification applications are typically brought under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986). Under Section 6 of the CDDA 1986, the court has a duty to make a disqualification order against a director of an insolvent company if it is satisfied that their conduct renders them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company. The key procedural details listed on the public cause list for this hearing are outlined below.
| Attribute | Cause List Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Turkswood Limited |
| Company Number | 01533330 |
| Case Number | CR-2025-003321 |
| Court List | Insolvency and Companies Court (High Court) |
| Hearing Date & Time | 28 July 2026 at 10:30am |
| Venue | Hearing Room 10, The Rolls Building, London |
| Case Type | Director Disqualification |
| Current Corporate Status | Liquidation |
Disqualification proceedings do not determine criminal liability. They evaluate whether a person should be restricted from acting as a company director or participating in the promotion, formation, or management of a business for a specified period, ranging up to 15 years.
Company Snapshot
Turkswood Limited was incorporated on 9 December 1980 and maintains its registered office at Floor 2, 10 Wellington Place, Leeds, LS1 4AP. According to statutory filings on the Companies House register, the business is categorized under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 46900 (Non-specialised wholesale trade) and 61900 (Other telecommunications activities).
The corporate record shows that Turkswood Limited is currently in liquidation. When a company enters liquidation, control of its assets, operations, and records passes from the directors to an appointed liquidator. Further background details on the entity's history can be reviewed via the Turkswood Limited profile.
Directors and Ownership
In accordance with Section 7 of the CDDA 1986, officeholders such as liquidators have a statutory obligation to submit a report to the Secretary of State on the conduct of all directors who were in office within the three years prior to the insolvency. The executive agency responsible for reviewing these reports and instituting court proceedings on behalf of the Secretary of State is the Insolvency Service.
While the cause list explicitly references Turkswood Limited as the subject company in case CR-2025-003321, specific individual respondents named in disqualification applications are formally served notice through court process. Public registers maintained by Companies House record all past and present officers, along with any active disqualification orders registered against individuals once formal orders are granted by the court.
Recent Filings and Gazette Activity
When a company enters liquidation, statutory notices regarding the appointment of liquidators and meetings of creditors are required to be published in The Gazette in accordance with the Insolvency Act 1986 and associated rules. These notices establish the formal framework under which claims against the insolvent estate must be submitted.
For counterparties reviewing companies in liquidation, tracking filings such as statement of affairs documents (Form PS01 or liquidator reports) on Companies House provides financial context regarding asset realisations, secured debt, and unsecured creditor shortfalls.
What This Means for Suppliers, Creditors and Counterparties
When an entity enters liquidation and faces secondary proceedings such as director disqualification, commercial counterparties must focus on risk mitigation and debt recovery mechanisms.
Practical Creditor Escalation Framework
1. Verify Claim Submission: Ensure all proof of debt forms and supporting contracts or invoices are formally lodged with the appointed liquidator.
2. Review Security and Retention of Title: Check whether goods delivered under Retention of Title (RoT) clauses can be recovered or whether existing security interests are validly registered on the charges register.
3. Assess Related-Party Entities: Directors facing disqualification may be associated with other active enterprise entities. Establish whether supply contracts or credit lines extend to associated companies.
4. Implement Continuous Monitoring: Set up continuous alerts to track status changes, court listings, and filings for connected corporate entities.
Worked Scenario: Assessing Counterparty Exposure
A commercial supplier had extended £45,000 in trade credit to a distributor. Following news of the distributor entering liquidation, the supplier reviewed public court listings and discovered a director disqualification application under CDDA 1986 against the company's former officers.
By identifying the disqualification proceedings early, the supplier's credit risk team cross-referenced the named directors against two other active trade customers in their portfolio. They established that one customer shared a common director. The supplier adjusted credit terms to cash-on-delivery for that active customer, avoiding further exposure before any wider credit contagion occurred. Establishing structured corporate oversight using free company monitoring allows risk managers to automate this cross-referencing process across their portfolio.
To check whether another commercial trading partner is subject to court enforcement or liquidation proceedings, perform a check any UK company for a winding up petition.
How to Investigate Further
Corporate intelligence professionals, insolvency lawyers, and credit managers systematically verify corporate risk using primary statutory data sources:
- Companies House: Review officer histories, statutory accounts, and liquidation filings.
- The Gazette: Search official notices for insolvency notifications, winding-up orders, and liquidator appointments.
- Court Cause Lists: Check daily rolls for the Insolvency and Companies Court to identify active litigation.
- Corp Intel: Access consolidated corporate records, insolvency indicators, and court listings through the central data registry.
FAQ
What is a director disqualification hearing?
A director disqualification hearing is a court proceeding brought under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, typically by the Secretary of State, to prohibit an individual from acting as a company director or managing a company due to alleged unfit conduct.
Does a disqualification proceeding recover money for creditors?
Not directly. Disqualification proceedings are regulatory and public protection measures rather than direct debt recovery mechanisms. However, under Section 15A of the CDDA 1986, the court can make a compensation order against a disqualified director if their conduct caused direct loss to creditors of an insolvent company.
Can a director continue to operate other companies during proceedings?
Until a formal disqualification order is made by the court or a disqualification undertaking is accepted by the Secretary of State, an individual is not legally disqualified. However, if an order is granted, the restriction applies across all UK registered companies unless specific permission is granted by the court under Section 17 of the CDDA 1986.
How long do director disqualification orders last?
Disqualification periods range from 2 years up to a statutory maximum of 15 years, depending on the severity of the conduct. Cases are generally categorized into low bracket (2-5 years), medium bracket (6-10 years), and top bracket (11-15 years) for particularly serious misconduct.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.