Spice Garden Indian Cuisine Ltd Faces High Court Winding-Up Petition Hearing
A winding-up petition against Spice Garden Indian Cuisine Ltd (case number CR-2026-005013) is scheduled for hearing at 11:00 am on 12 August 2026 in Court 1 of the Rolls Building, London. The matter is listed before the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (Insolvency and Companies List). The petition seeks a compulsory liquidation order against the Luton-based hospitality business under the statutory provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986.
Hearing details
The following table details the listing parameters as published on the official court cause list:
| Parameter | Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Spice Garden Indian Cuisine Ltd |
| Company Number | 09925904 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-005013 |
| Court | High Court of Justice (Insolvency and Companies List) |
| Venue | Rolls Building, Court 1, London |
| Hearing Date | 12 August 2026 |
| Hearing Time | 11:00 am |
| Case Type | Winding-up Petition |
Company snapshot
Spice Garden Indian Cuisine Ltd (company number 09925904) was incorporated on 22 December 2015 as a private limited company. Its registered office is situated at Suite A, 1st Floor, 2a Windsor Street, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 3UB. The business is classified under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 56101 for licensed restaurants.
Official public records show that the company currently carries a register status of "active - proposal to strike off". Under Section 1000 of the Companies Act 2006, the Registrar of Companies initiates compulsory strike-off action when there is reasonable cause to believe a business is no longer operating or has failed to file required statutory returns. However, the presentation of a High Court winding-up petition supersedes routine administrative strike-off procedures. When court proceedings are initiated by a creditor, Companies House suspends dissolution to ensure the company's assets and liabilities are resolved under judicial supervision.
Financial records and historical filings are maintained on the official public register at Companies House. Interested parties can also review the consolidated corporate profile on Corp Intel.
Directors and ownership
The corporate governance structure of Spice Garden Indian Cuisine Ltd is recorded on the public register in compliance with statutory disclosure obligations, including enhanced identity verification requirements introduced under UK legislation. Legal representatives and credit managers evaluating the entity should review statutory directorship filings to confirm current management, historic resignations, and persons with significant control (PSCs).
When evaluating counterparties subject to pending court action, reviewing historical directorship records across linked entities provides necessary commercial context regarding operational experience and governance standards.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
The public record reflects concurrent regulatory and judicial developments. Although Companies House records an active proposal to strike off, the listing of case CR-2026-005013 confirms formal winding-up proceedings in the High Court. Statutory notices concerning winding-up petitions, court hearings, and insolvency appointments are formally advertised in The Gazette.
Credit controllers and legal professionals tracking court schedules can inspect daily updates via today's cause list or cross-reference broader High Court listings on the official court roll.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition creates significant legal risks under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Any disposition of company property, including bank transfers and asset disposals executed after the petition presentation date, is void if a compulsory winding-up order is granted, unless validated by a specific order of the court.
Creditors, landlords, and trade suppliers dealing with Spice Garden Indian Cuisine Ltd should execute a structured risk assessment:
1. Freeze credit extensions: Transition all active trading to pre-paid terms to prevent post-petition transactions that risk recovery under Section 127.
2. Verify petition details: Conduct a formal winding up petition search to establish exact presentation dates and petitioner details.
3. Review existing charges: Perform a comprehensive company charge check to check whether secured creditors hold fixed or floating charges over company assets.
4. Set up real-time monitoring: Establish free company monitoring to receive instant notifications regarding registry filings, Gazette advertisements, or court adjournments.
Worked scenario
Consider a commercial food wholesaler supplying goods on standard 30-day invoice terms. If the wholesaler receives a payment of £4,500 after a winding-up petition has been presented, and the High Court subsequently issues a compulsory winding-up order, the court-appointed liquidator can demand repayment of that £4,500 under Section 127 as an invalid disposition of property. Counterparties must verify whether a validation order exists before accepting substantial post-petition settlements.
How to investigate further
Investigating entities appearing on the High Court cause list traditionally involves cross-referencing multiple separate sources, including Companies House, court lists, and official advertisements in The Gazette.
Corp Intel consolidates public registry filings and daily judicial lists into a single analytical dashboard. By integrating cause lists directly with live corporate registries, risk professionals and legal teams can conduct complete counterparty due diligence efficiently without manually navigating multiple government databases.
FAQ
What does a "proposal to strike off" mean when a winding-up petition is pending?
A proposal to strike off indicates administrative action by Companies House to dissolve an inactive company. However, when a creditor presents a winding-up petition, the court process takes priority and administrative strike-off proceedings are paused.
How does Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 impact suppliers?
Section 127 makes any property disposition or bank payment made after the petition date void if a compulsory winding-up order is made, unless explicitly validated by court order.
What outcomes can occur at the High Court hearing?
The High Court judge may grant a winding-up order, dismiss the petition if the underlying debt is settled or disputed on genuine grounds, or adjourn the hearing to allow the parties time to resolve the matter.
How can creditors track updates regarding this hearing?
Creditors can monitor developments through published Gazette advertisements, daily cause lists, or by using automated alert services to track changes to the company's public file.
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.