Senate Bespoke Construction Faces Winding-Up Petition
A winding-up petition has been presented against SENATE BESPOKE CONSTRUCTION LTD at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions on 9 October 2026 under case reference CR-2026-007774. The filing was recorded on the High Court CE-File public registry system on 11 October 2026. Presentation of a winding-up petition represents the formal commencement of court proceedings under Section 124 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Presentation is the earliest public signal of creditor enforcement and does not constitute a legal determination of insolvency; the final outcome remains a matter for the court.
Petition details
The table below details the official filing information as recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions:
| Attribute | Court Record Details |
| --- | --- |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-007774 |
| Case Title | Senate Bespoke Construction Limited |
| Case Type | Companies - Petition - Winding Up Petition |
| Presentation Date | 09/10/2026 |
| Recording Source | Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions (CE-File) |
| Petitioning Creditor | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Petition Amount | [Check the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Hearing Date | [Check the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
The identity of the petitioning creditor and the magnitude of the claimed debt are not disclosed in the published court record. Interested parties can monitor daily court filings on the daily winding-up petitions cause list.
Company snapshot
SENATE BESPOKE CONSTRUCTION LTD (company number 09497524) was incorporated on 19 March 2015. The company's registered office address is recorded on the official register as West Clayton Business Centre, Berry Lane, Chorleywood, Hertfordshire, England, WD3 5EX.
Public filings at Companies House show the business operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 41100 (Development of building projects) and 41202 (Construction of domestic buildings). Turnover figures, net asset balances, and going-concern disclosures are not stated in the published source.
Directors and ownership
Official register filings at Companies House confirm the management and ownership structure:
- Mr Jason Woodford: Appointed as director on 19 March 2015. Born in February 1971, resident in England, British nationality.
- Persons with Significant Control (PSC): Mr Jason Woodford was recorded as a person with significant control on 17 March 2017, holding between 75% and 100% of the voting rights and shares.
Two historical PSC statements registered on 19 March 2017 were recorded as ceased on 5 May 2024. Corporate register records reflect official filings and do not associate any named individual with personal liability or wrongdoing.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
A review of statutory publications in The Gazette shows no prior advertisement of insolvency petitions or orders against the company.
Under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, a petitioner must advertise the petition in The Gazette no less than seven clear business days after service and at least seven clear business days prior to the listed court hearing, unless the court orders otherwise.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition introduces immediate legal risk under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. If a compulsory winding-up order is ultimately made, any disposition of the company's property made after the petition presentation date is void unless validated by the court.
Credit controllers and commercial suppliers reviewing exposure should implement the following steps:
1. Audit post-petition transactions: Identify all invoices, goods dispatches, and payments processed after 9 October 2026.
2. Adjust payment terms: Evaluate placing ongoing orders on pro-forma or cash-on-delivery terms while court proceedings remain pending.
3. Verify retention of title: Review contract terms to determine whether retention of title (ROT) clauses apply to delivered materials.
4. Execute counterparty searches: Perform a winding up search across corporate counterparties to detect related insolvency filings.
5. Monitor statutory notices: Track advertisement listings in The Gazette for formal hearing listings.
Scenario: Managing subcontractor exposure
Consider a main contractor holding an active contract with a building specialist facing a newly presented petition. Releasing milestone payments post-presentation without a court validation order creates significant legal exposure under Section 127 if a winding-up order is later granted. Credit teams typically pause unvalidated payments and consult legal advisers regarding validation orders.
How credit teams track petition risk manually vs automatically
Monitoring counterparty risk manually requires credit professionals to query Companies House filings, search court registries on CE-File, inspect The Gazette, and contact registry clerks. This manual approach presents distinct operational limitations:
- CE-File entries exist before Gazette notices, but manual registry checks require case-by-case queries.
- Companies House records update after court orders are lodged, creating an information lag during initial presentation stages.
- Periodic manual reviews often miss early filing indicators before credit exposure builds.
Automating corporate monitoring via free company monitoring delivers immediate notifications when court actions or corporate filings occur.
How to investigate further
To inspect further details regarding SENATE BESPOKE CONSTRUCTION LTD:
- Access the official company register entry at Companies House.
- Perform a winding up petition search to review cause-list filings and corporate histories.
- Review statutory insolvency notices published in The Gazette.
For credit teams and suppliers
Credit managers, contractors, and material suppliers operating in construction supply chains require early visibility on high-court enforcement actions. Failing to detect a High Court petition prior to supplying goods or issuing interim contract payments creates exposure under Section 127. Conducting a dedicated winding up search enables risk teams to verify counterparty solvency status during routine credit reviews.
FAQ
What does the presentation of a winding-up petition mean?
The presentation of a winding-up petition signifies that a creditor has formally filed an application with the High Court under Section 124 of the Insolvency Act 1986 seeking to liquidate the company. It marks the start of court proceedings but is not a ruling of insolvency.
How long after a petition is presented does the hearing occur?
Court hearings are generally scheduled four to eight weeks after presentation at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions, depending on court listing schedules.
Why is the petitioning creditor not listed on the public court record?
Initial registry entries on CE-File show standard filing references. Details regarding the petitioning creditor and exact claim values are disclosed when the notice is advertised in The Gazette or published on cause lists.
Can a company trade after a petition is filed?
A company can legally continue trading, but Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 renders post-petition asset transfers void if a winding-up order is granted, unless validated by court order. Financial institutions frequently restrict bank account operations upon learning of a petition.
What actions should suppliers take when a petition is filed?
Suppliers should audit outstanding receivables, review contract terms, assess retention of title provisions, and seek legal guidance regarding validation orders.
Disclaimer
This report summarises a petition recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.