Sardo Construction Management Services Ltd Listed for ICC Interim Hearing
Sardo Construction Management Services Ltd appeared on the High Court Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) interim list on 10 July 2026 under case number CR-2026-003211. The listing at 10:30am was scheduled as a non-attendance proceeding dealt with in chambers by an ICC Judge.
Hearing details
| Parameter | Detail |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | SARDO CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD |
| Company Number | 08329504 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-003211 |
| Court | High Court of Justice, Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Hearing Date & Time | 10 July 2026 at 10:30am |
| Hearing Format | Non-attendance (In Chambers) |
| List Type | ICC Interim List |
Company snapshot
Incorporated on 13 December 2012 under company registration number 08329504, Sardo Construction Management Services Ltd is an active private limited company. The entity's primary business activities are registered under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 41100 for the development of building projects and 70229 for management consultancy activities other than financial management. Its official registered office address on the register maintained by Companies House is Jenaven, Galphay, Ripon, England, HG4 3NJ.
Public filings confirm that the company maintains an active corporate status. No turnover or net asset figures are published directly within the daily cause list, and no active compulsory winding-up order or strike-off notice has been recorded against the business. Financial directors and legal risk managers reviewing counterparty status should assess the entity's underlying corporate filings and mortgage register to determine financial stability.
Directors and ownership
Public records establish that ownership and directorship of Sardo Construction Management Services Ltd are registered under the Persons with Significant Control (PSC) regime. Mr Mario Sardo has been registered as a PSC since 1 December 2016, holding between 25% and 50% of the company's issued shares, between 25% and 50% of total voting rights, and the statutory right to appoint or remove directors.
Additional PSC filings show that Ms Siu Cheung was notified as a PSC on 1 October 2025, holding between 25% and 50% of shares and voting rights, following the cessation of a previous control entry recorded on the same date. A full historic register of officers, PSC filings, and company details is accessible via the Sardo Construction Management Services Ltd profile.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
At the time of this report, no statutory insolvency notices, petition advertisements, or administration filings concerning Sardo Construction Management Services Ltd have appeared in The Gazette. Under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, a petitioner must advertise a winding-up petition in The Gazette no less than seven clear business days after serving it on the company and no less than seven clear business days before the main hearing, unless exempted by court order.
Consequently, cause list appearances on the ICC interim list frequently occur prior to formal publication in The Gazette. Legal practitioners and commercial suppliers tracking counterparty exposure cannot rely exclusively on Gazette entries, as court filings and cause list listings provide an earlier indication of formal High Court proceedings.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
An interim listing before the Insolvency and Companies Court signals active judicial supervision of an application or procedural step in the High Court. While interim hearings encompass administrative directions, consent orders, shareholder disputes under s.994 of the Companies Act 2006, or applications to restrain advertisement, they can also relate to pending winding-up petitions.
If a hearing arises from a compulsory winding-up petition, section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 becomes directly relevant. Under s.127, any disposition of company property, including payments made from corporate bank accounts or transfers of assets made after the presentation of a petition, is void in the event that a winding-up order is subsequently made, unless validated by court order. Commercial banks routinely monitor High Court cause lists and will freeze corporate bank accounts upon learning of a pending petition to prevent potential liability under s.127. Such freezing orders immediately disrupt operational cash flow and trade execution.
Creditor Action Checklist
Credit controllers and commercial risk analysts who identify a counterparty on the ICC cause list should take immediate steps to safeguard balance sheet exposure:
1. Verify the procedural context: Inspect court files or request confirmation from the debtor's legal representatives to determine whether case CR-2026-003211 involves a winding-up petition, an injunction, or a procedural stay.
2. Conduct a security audit: Run a comprehensive company charge check to verify whether existing lenders hold debentures, fixed charges, or floating charges over company assets.
3. Quantify financial exposure: Calculate total outstanding invoices, goods in transit, and unbilled work in progress to determine net credit exposure.
4. Implement temporary risk mitigation: Adjust credit limits, request cash on delivery, or pause further deliveries until court status is formally clarified.
5. Establish ongoing tracking: Enroll in free company monitoring to receive real-time notification of new court entries, Gazette publications, or Companies House filings.
Practical Worked Scenario
Consider a composite scenario involving a specialist building supplies distributor that maintains a £50,000 credit limit with a commercial construction firm listed on the ICC interim list. Upon identifying the cause list entry before any public advertisement in The Gazette, the distributor's risk committee immediately pauses active deliveries on open credit terms.
The distributor contacts the debtor company to request written confirmation regarding the nature of the application under case CR-2026-003211. Upon learning that the hearing relates to a pending petition dispute, the distributor requires advance payment or court-validated settlement before releasing further materials. This swift intervention protects the distributor from receiving funds that a future liquidator might seek to claw back as void dispositions under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
How to investigate further
Tracking High Court proceedings manually requires monitoring daily court cause lists, reviewing filings on the official roll, submitting formal searches to the court registry, and manually cross-referencing Companies House records. This fragmented procedure introduces delay and creates potential blind spots for credit control teams.
Corp Intel centralises corporate court data and public register information into a real-time risk intelligence system. Credit practitioners can perform an instant winding up petition search across active High Court filings or review today's winding up petitions list to evaluate litigation activity across UK counterparties.
FAQ
What is the function of the ICC interim list?
The Insolvency and Companies Court interim list handles urgent applications, procedural applications, case management directions, and short interim hearings in insolvency and corporate law matters. It allows judges to determine procedural steps before matters proceed to a full trial or final disposal.
Does appearing on the ICC interim list mean a company is insolvent?
No. An appearance on the court list is a factual record of legal proceedings. Interim hearings handle various matters, including procedural applications, applications to restrain petition advertisement, and shareholder disputes. It does not constitute a legal finding of insolvency.
What occurs during a non-attendance hearing in chambers?
A non-attendance hearing is determined by an ICC Judge in chambers based on written witness statements, legal skeletons, and draft orders submitted by solicitors. Parties and counsel do not attend court in person or via video link, making it an efficient method for routine administrative directions.
How does section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 affect commercial transactions?
Section 127 provides that any disposition of company property made after the presentation of a winding-up petition is void if a winding-up order is ultimately granted. Payees may be required to return funds to a court-appointed liquidator unless the High Court grants a validation order authorizing the transaction.
What is a s.127 validation order?
A validation order is a discretionary order granted by the court under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. It permits a company subject to a winding-up petition to make specified dispositions, such as paying trade suppliers or staff wages, where the court is satisfied that the transactions benefit the general body of creditors.
How can credit managers verify if a company has an active winding-up petition?
Credit managers can check court filing databases, inspect cause lists on the official roll, or conduct a winding up petition search to verify current High Court petitions against UK entities.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.