Remedi Healthcare Faces Winding-Up Petition
A winding-up petition has been presented against Remedi Healthcare Limited in the High Court of Justice. The petition was filed at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions on 23 October 2026 under case number CR-2026-008150. Presentation of a winding-up petition is an initial procedural step by a petitioner seeking compulsory liquidation. It is not a determination of insolvency, and the court has made no finding on the merits of the case.
Petition details
The table below sets out the procedural details recorded on the court record as of 24 October 2026.
| Case detail | Filing record |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case number | CR-2026-008150 |
| Filing date | 23 October 2026 |
| Court | Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions (Rolls Building, London) |
| Case type | Companies - Petition - Winding Up Petition |
| Petitioner name | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Petitioner solicitor | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Petition debt amount | [Check the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| First hearing date | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
Company snapshot
Public records maintained by Companies House show that Remedi Healthcare Limited (company number 16102310) was incorporated on 26 November 2024. Its registered office is recorded at 16 Berkeley Court, Runcorn, Cheshire, England, WA7 1TQ.
The company operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 47730, covering dispensing chemist activities in specialised stores. As an entity incorporated in late 2024, its latest filed turnover, balance sheet totals, and trading accounts are [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor). For further details on company filings, refer to the Remedi Healthcare Limited profile on Corp Intel.
Directors and ownership
The public register records the following directorship and control details for Remedi Healthcare Limited:
- Director: Mr Nadeem Ahmed Sarwar (British nationality, resident in Scotland, born May 1981) was appointed as director on 26 November 2024 and remains actively listed on the register.
- Former PSC: Nadiah Ahmed Sarwar (British nationality, resident in Scotland) was notified as a person with significant control on 26 November 2024, holding 75% to 100% of shares, voting rights, and the right to appoint and remove directors. This control ceased on 1 January 2025.
- Current PSC: Mr Nadeem Ahmed Sarwar was notified on 1 January 2025 as holding 75% to 100% of shares, 75% to 100% of voting rights, and the right to appoint and remove directors.
These details reflect factual entries on the public register. The filing of a petition attaches to the corporate entity rather than any individual officer.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
A search of The Gazette shows no statutory advertisement published for case CR-2026-008150. Under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, a petitioner must not advertise the petition before seven business days have elapsed following formal service on the company, unless the court orders otherwise.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition carries immediate commercial and legal consequences under the Insolvency Act 1986 Section 127. Under Section 127, any disposition of the company's property made after the date of presentation is void if a winding-up order is subsequently made, unless validated by the court.
When banks become aware of a petition, they routinely freeze the company's bank accounts to prevent potential liability under Section 127. Counterparties dealing with the company face specific transactional risks:
- Payment clawback risk: Payments made by the company to suppliers after 23 October 2026 could be challenged by an Official Receiver or liquidator if no validation order is granted.
- Supply chain exposure: Continued delivery of stock on standard credit terms increases exposure if the company is placed into compulsory liquidation.
Worked example: Section 127 supply exposure
Consider an equipment supplier with £25,000 in trade credit extended to a healthcare retailer. If the supplier continues to deliver goods on credit post-presentation, and receives payments from the debtor's account, those receipts are vulnerable to clawback under Section 127 upon the making of a winding-up order. To manage this risk, credit teams typically halt unsecured credit, demand payment via confirmed third-party guarantees or advance cleared funds, and verify whether the debtor has secured a validation order under Section 127.
Exposure checklist for commercial counterparties
1. Calculate total current exposure, including open invoices, work in progress, and unbilled deliveries.
2. Review terms of business to enforce retention of title (RoT) clauses over unpaid inventory held on site.
3. Suspend unsecured credit lines and move transactions to pro-forma or cash-on-delivery terms.
4. Request confirmation from the company's solicitors regarding whether an application for a Section 127 validation order or a dismissal hearing has been filed.
5. Conduct a regular winding up search across counterparty portfolios to spot filings before public advertisement.
How to investigate further
Creditors and counterparties reviewing Remedi Healthcare Limited should cross-reference information across primary public authorities. The court record at the Rolls Building holds the underlying pleadings, while Companies House tracks statutory corporate changes.
To view current hearing cause lists and daily filings across the High Court, check today's winding-up petition list. Corporate credit teams requiring automated alerts on future filings, charges, and status shifts should establish free company monitoring. Where legal proceedings or property completions require verified evidence of court status, counterparties can [Get a Winding Up Search Certificate →](#offers-certificate).
For credit teams and suppliers
A routine winding up search is an essential due diligence step for credit underwriters, lenders, and wholesale suppliers before approving substantial facilities or releasing security. Identifying a petition at presentation, before Gazette advertisement, prevents unrecoverable supply dispositions under Section 127. Credit controllers should review counterparty exposure immediately upon a registry entry to safeguard cash flow.
FAQ
What is a winding-up petition?
A winding-up petition is a formal legal application made to the court, typically by an unpaid creditor, asking the court to liquidate a company on the grounds that it is unable to pay its debts as they fall due.
Does the presentation of a petition mean the company is insolvent?
No. Presentation is the start of a judicial process, not an order of insolvency. A company may dispute the debt on substantial grounds, pay the outstanding sum, or reach a settlement resulting in dismissal or withdrawal of the petition.
Why is Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 important?
Section 127 renders void any property dispositions or asset transfers made by the company after the petition filing date if a winding-up order is made. Commercial counterparties receiving funds without a validation order risk clawback claims from a future liquidator.
How does a winding up petition search assist suppliers?
A timely winding up petition search identifies petitions recorded at the Central Registry during the pre-advertisement window, enabling credit teams to manage contractual terms and protect against insolvency exposure before the wider market is notified.
Disclaimer
This report summarises a petition recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.