Rafah Hanna Ltd Faces Winding-Up Petition
A winding-up petition has been presented against Rafah Hanna Ltd in the High Court of Justice. According to records maintained at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions, the filing was lodged on 21 October 2026 under case number CR-2026-008185.
The presentation of a winding-up petition represents the opening formal stage in compulsory liquidation proceedings. It does not constitute a judicial ruling that the company is insolvent, nor does it guarantee that a winding-up order will be made. The matter remains pending determination by the court.
Petition details
The details recorded on the court filing system are summarised below:
| Field | Court Record Detail |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Rafah Hanna Ltd |
| Court Reference | CR-2026-008185 |
| Filing Date | 21 October 2026 |
| Case Type | Companies - Petition - Winding Up Petition |
| Filing Source | Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions (CE-File) |
| Petitioning Creditor | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Petition Debt Amount | [Check the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
Court CE-File records indicate the filing date and formal case classification but do not publish creditor identities or claimed debt sums on the public register. Where formal verification is required for court or conveyancing files, practitioners typically [Get a Winding Up Search Certificate →](#offers-certificate).
Company snapshot
Public records from Companies House confirm the corporate background for the business:
- Registered Name: RAFAH HANNA LTD
- Company Number: 11796115
- Company Status: Active
- Date of Incorporation: 29 January 2019
- Registered Office: 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, England, WC2H 9JQ
- Standard Industrial Classification (SIC):
- 62020: Information technology consultancy activities
- 70229: Management consultancy activities other than financial management
Detailed corporate intelligence and register history are accessible directly via the Rafah Hanna Ltd profile on Corp Intel. Financial statements, turnover, and balance sheet figures are not stated in the published source for this filing summary.
Directors and ownership
Public filings on the statutory register disclose the following officer appointments and significant control records for Rafah Hanna Ltd:
- Director: Mr Rafah Hanna
- Date of Appointment: 29 January 2019
- Nationality: British
- Country of Residence: United Kingdom
- Date of Birth: November 1972
- Status: Current director
- Person with Significant Control (PSC): Mr Rafah Hanna
- Notified Date: 29 January 2019
- Nature of Control: Holds 75% to 100% of the shares, holds 75% to 100% of the voting rights, and holds the right to appoint and remove directors.
These details reflect the statutory register as maintained by the Registrar of Companies. Company law treats the corporate entity as legally distinct from its officers; filing records provide factual corporate data and do not imply personal liability or wrongdoing.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
No notices relating to winding-up petitions, administration, or strike-off for this entity appear in The Gazette in the immediate filing record. Under court rules, a petitioner must serve the petition on the registered office and wait at least seven business days before advertising in The Gazette, unless directed otherwise by the court.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition creates significant legal risks under English insolvency law. Under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of the company's property made after the presentation of the petition is void if the court subsequently grants a winding-up order, unless the court orders otherwise via a validation order.
Creditors and counterparties dealing with a company facing a petition must review risk exposure across several key areas:
1. Banking operations: Commercial banks routinely monitor the Central Registry. Once aware of a petition, financial institutions often freeze corporate bank accounts to avoid liability for post-petition dispositions.
2. Ongoing contracts: Payments received from the company between petition presentation and a final order may be subject to clawback by a liquidator under Section 127.
3. Credit extensions: Supplying additional goods or services on unsecured terms exposes vendors to bad debt risk if a compulsory liquidation order follows.
Practical exposure assessment
Credit teams assessing an active trading relationship should follow a structured review process:
- Step 1: Quantify Ledger Exposure. Identify all outstanding invoices, open purchase orders, and unbilled work currently tied to the company.
- Step 2: Inspect Security and Title. Review contracts for robust retention of title clauses or registered security.
- Step 3: Adjust Trading Terms. Switch ongoing transactions to payment on delivery or cash in advance to mitigate future voidable transactions.
- Step 4: Central Court Monitoring. Conduct regular searches against court records to check whether a hearing date is listed or the petition is dismissed.
Operational scenario: Counterparty supply chain
Consider an IT contractor providing specialised consultancy through a service agreement with a firm subject to a petition. If the consultancy firm pays an outstanding invoice of £15,000 two weeks after the petition was presented, and the court later orders the firm into liquidation, that £15,000 transfer is void under Section 127. The court-appointed liquidator can demand repayment of the funds unless the contractor obtains a validation order under Section 127. Performing a timely winding up search before delivering high-value services prevents sudden clawback exposures.
For credit teams and suppliers
A routine credit report often lags behind court developments by days or weeks. Legal teams, asset managers, and credit controllers use a formal winding up search before completing large commercial transactions, releasing title deeds, or agreeing debt deferrals. Discovering a petition early gives counterparties leverage to secure payments before bank accounts freeze. Trade creditors reviewing wider supply chains can also inspect the daily winding-up petitions list to catch emerging filings.
How to investigate further
Credit professionals traditionally check court status by submitting phone inquiries to the Insolvency Service or inspecting court cause lists manually. For ongoing credit protection, counterparties can implement free company monitoring to receive real-time updates on statutory register changes, new charges, and Gazette publications.
FAQ
Does a winding-up petition mean the company is in liquidation?
No. A petition is an application by a creditor seeking an order for liquidation. The company has the opportunity to pay the debt, reach a settlement, or dispute the claim before a judge makes a formal winding-up order.
When will a hearing take place?
Once a petition is filed at the Central Registry, the court typically lists a hearing date within 6 to 10 weeks, depending on court availability and whether the matter is defended.
Why is a petition advertised in The Gazette?
Under the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, a petitioner must advertise the petition at least seven business days before the hearing. Advertisement notifies other creditors so they may support or oppose the winding-up petition.
How does a winding up petition search differ from a Companies House search?
A Companies House search only reveals insolvency proceedings after formal documents are registered. A dedicated winding up petition search interrogates the Central Registry on CE-File directly, identifying proceedings weeks before they appear on the Companies House register.
Disclaimer
This report summarises a petition recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.