Play Centres Limited: Director Disqualification Hearing Scheduled at Rolls Building
A director disqualification hearing concerning the management of Play Centres Limited is listed for 10:30am on 14 July 2026 at the Rolls Building, London. The proceedings, filed under case CR-2025-006224 in the Insolvency and Companies Court, follow a winding-up order made against the company on 17 July 2024. Proceedings brought under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) indicate a statutory investigation has identified potential unfit conduct during the company's trading period.
Hearing details
| Case Element | Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Number | CR-2025-006224 |
| Company Name | Play Centres Limited |
| Hearing Date | 14 July 2026 |
| Hearing Time | 10:30am |
| Venue | The Rolls Building, Hearing Room 7 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court |
Company snapshot and insolvency timeline
Play Centres Limited (CRN: 11410520) was incorporated on 12 June 2018. The entity operated under standard industrial classification (SIC) code 93290, covering amusement and recreation activities. The Companies House register shows the North West England-based entity entered compulsory liquidation following a petition presented in early 2024.
The London Gazette recorded the subsequent winding-up order on 17 July 2024. Following a compulsory liquidation, the Official Receiver has a statutory duty to investigate the causes of failure. The current hearing is the culmination of that process.
Expert analysis: Contagion risk and cross-directorships
Under Section 7 of the CDDA 1986, the Secretary of State must apply for a disqualification order if the Insolvency Service concludes it is in the public interest. Disqualification orders range from 2 to 15 years depending on the severity of the misconduct.
For corporate finance advisers, insolvency practitioners, and lenders, a pending disqualification hearing signals severe contagion risk. If a director is disqualified, they cannot act as a director or take part in the promotion, formation, or management of any UK company without specific court leave. This immediately jeopardises any other active entities where the individual holds office. A disqualification order can trigger material adverse change (MAC) clauses in facility agreements and often prompts lenders to review their exposure across connected businesses.
Worked example: Managing cross-entity exposure
Consider a commercial lender holding a floating charge over a separate, actively trading entity where a director of Play Centres Limited also holds a statutory appointment. Upon discovering the CR-2025-006224 proceedings, the lender's credit team reviews the facility agreement. The pending disqualification threatens the director's ability to govern the second company.
The lender initiates a company charge check to confirm their security position across the wider corporate group. They then require the borrower to appoint an alternative director to ensure continuity of management and compliance with the loan covenants before the July 2026 hearing takes place.
Checklist: Assessing risk when a counterparty faces disqualification
1. Map cross-directorships: Identify all active appointments held by the individuals named in the proceedings across your ledger.
2. Review facility agreements: Check if a director's disqualification or regulatory censure triggers a default event or MAC clause.
3. Assess security: Confirm the status of any fixed or floating charges registered against the insolvent entity and related companies.
4. Monitor court lists: Track the Insolvency and Companies Court cause list for subsequent hearings, adjournments, or final orders.
Streamlining post-insolvency oversight
Traditionally, compliance and credit teams track post-insolvency enforcement by manually cross-referencing Companies House filings, searching the Individual Insolvency Register, and checking daily court cause lists. This reactive approach often results in delayed risk identification, especially when directors hold complex portfolios of appointments across multiple jurisdictions.
Corp Intel automates this oversight. By using our winding up petition search, professionals can instantly verify the insolvency status of any UK entity. Rather than manually checking registers on a monthly cadence, risk teams can monitor a UK company free to receive immediate alerts when a counterparty director faces regulatory action, winding-up petitions, or changes to their appointment status. This ensures your audit trail remains defensible and your credit decisions are based on real-time court data.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition or listing of a hearing is not a final determination of liability; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.