NTM Drainage Limited Director Disqualification Hearing: High Court Cause List
The High Court of Justice Insolvency and Companies Court has scheduled a director disqualification hearing relating to NTM Drainage Limited (Company No. 10465446) under case reference CR-2025-004499. The application is set to be heard on 25 August 2026 at 10:30am in hearing room 8 at The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London. Director disqualification proceedings in the High Court are typically initiated under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 by the Secretary of State or the Insolvency Service following an official investigation into corporate conduct.
Hearing details
The key administrative details extracted from the published High Court cause list are set out below:
| Field | Court cause list entry |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Name | NTM Drainage Limited |
| Case Reference | CR-2025-004499 |
| Hearing Type | Director Disqualification Hearing |
| Court | High Court Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Date & Time | 25 August 2026 at 10:30am |
| Venue | Hearing Room 8, The Rolls Building, London |
| Subject Entity | NTM Drainage Limited (Company No. 10465446) |
Readers can review current list updates on the today's cause list page or monitor the broader High Court schedule on the official roll.
Company snapshot
NTM Drainage Limited is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under company number 10465446. Further statutory corporate details, historical filings, and directorship records can be reviewed on the NTM Drainage Limited company profile.
Public records maintained on the Companies House register provide background on the company's operational classification and filing timeline. Under UK corporate law, limited companies must file annual accounts and confirmation statements to remain compliant with statutory reporting standards set out in the Companies Act 2006.
Directors and ownership
Director disqualification applications under Section 6 or Section 7 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 consider whether the conduct of a director makes them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company. When the Insolvency Service or Secretary of State determines that unfit conduct has occurred, formal proceedings are issued in the High Court.
Disqualification orders can range from 2 to 15 years depending on the severity of the alleged misconduct. Common grounds considered during CDDA 1986 proceedings include trading to the detriment of Crown creditors, failing to maintain proper accounting records under Section 386 of the Companies Act 2006, or continuing to trade while insolvent to the detriment of commercial suppliers.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
A review of statutory announcements published in The Gazette provides official notices regarding insolvency appointments, petition listings, or administrative changes associated with the entity or related officers.
Where an underlying liquidation or administration has preceded a disqualification application, formal notifications appear in the London Gazette detailing the appointment of insolvency practitioners and creditor submission deadlines.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
A director disqualification hearing against an officer connected to NTM Drainage Limited requires commercial counterparties to evaluate potential indirect risks and verify governance structures.
Worked scenario: Assessing counterparty leadership risk
Consider a commercial supplier, Company A, providing drainage equipment on 60-day credit terms to a contractor whose managing director is subject to High Court disqualification proceedings. Although the disqualification proceeding is an action against the individual director rather than an immediate freezing order on corporate bank accounts, Company A faces specific operational risks:
1. Governance disruption: If a disqualification order is granted, the named individual must immediately vacate all directorships and cease taking part in company management.
2. Credit exposure: A company whose management faces unfit conduct allegations may encounter reduced access to trade credit or bank facilities.
3. Security validation: Secured creditors typically audit asset coverage to ensure debentures and security charges remain valid.
To establish risk exposure, commercial teams should follow a structured verification checklist:
1. Verify active directorships: Cross-check public register filings to determine whether the target individual holds active roles across associated entities.
2. Conduct security reviews: Perform a comprehensive company charge check to determine existing fixed and floating charges registered against the corporate entity.
3. Check insolvency status: Run a targeted winding up petition search to ensure no concurrent petitions or winding-up orders affect the entity.
4. Automate ongoing alerts: Implement free company monitoring to receive real-time notifications of directorship appointments, resignations, or statutory filing updates.
How to investigate further
Corporate intelligence analysts and legal teams investigating High Court proceedings rely on structured multi-source verification. Traditionally, professionals manually cross-reference court cause lists, Gazette notices, and Companies House records to construct an accurate counterparty risk profile.
Using integrated monitoring solutions streamlines this workflow. Analysts can track petition filings, directorship updates, and charge filings automatically across all UK corporate entities.
To review full historical listings or search active court entries, visit the official roll or perform a winding up petition search.
FAQ
What is the purpose of a director disqualification hearing?
A director disqualification hearing evaluates whether an individual should be banned from acting as a company director or participating in the promotion, formation, or management of a company. Proceedings are brought by the Insolvency Service on behalf of the Secretary of State under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
Does a disqualification proceeding automatically close the company?
No. A disqualification application targets the individual director rather than the company itself. However, if the court issues a disqualification order, the individual must step down immediately. The company must appoint replacement directors to continue trading lawfully under the Companies Act 2006.
How long can a director disqualification order last?
Disqualification orders are categorized into three bands under CDDA 1986 guidelines: lower bracket (2 to 5 years for minor misconduct), middle bracket (6 to 10 years for serious misconduct), and top bracket (11 to 15 years for severe misconduct or repeated offences).
How can credit managers track director disqualification risks?
Credit managers can perform regular checks against Companies House disqualification registers, run a company charge check on counterparty security, and enable free company monitoring for automated filing alerts.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.