Mindex Limited (01800799): High Court Winding-Up Petition Hearing Listed
A winding-up petition against Mindex Limited (01800799) is scheduled for a High Court hearing on 22 July 2026. For creditors, lenders, and supply chain counterparties, the presentation of a petition under the Insolvency Act 1986 triggers immediate statutory risks, most notably the threat of retrospective voiding of transactions.
The petition will be heard in the Business and Property Courts at the Rolls Building, London.
High Court Listing Details
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Mindex Limited |
| Company Number | 01800799 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-004295 |
| Hearing Date | 22 July 2026 |
| Hearing Time | 11:00 am |
| Venue | Rolls Building, Court 1, London |
| Jurisdiction | High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts |
Company Profile
Incorporated on 16 March 1984, Mindex Limited operates from a registered office in Horley, Surrey. The entity trades under SIC code 46900, covering non-specialised wholesale trade. According to the Companies House register, it files accounts under the small company regime, entitling it to certain statutory filing exemptions.
Expert Analysis: The Section 127 Risk
The period between the presentation of a petition and the court hearing is highly precarious for the respondent company and its counterparties. Under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of the company's property made after the commencement of the winding up is void unless the court orders otherwise.
High street banks routinely freeze corporate accounts upon discovering a petition to avoid liability for facilitating void dispositions. For suppliers, accepting payment for historical debt or supplying new goods on credit carries a severe risk of clawback if a winding-up order is subsequently made. The liquidator has a statutory duty to recover these funds for the benefit of the general body of creditors.
Scenario: The Supply Chain Blind Spot
Consider a composite scenario typical in the wholesale sector. A supplier delivers £15,000 of inventory to a customer three days after a winding-up petition is presented. The supplier is unaware of the court filing because it has not yet been advertised in The Gazette. The customer pays the invoice immediately from a secondary bank account that has not yet been frozen.
Two weeks later, the court grants a winding-up order. The appointed liquidator demands the £15,000 back from the supplier, as the payment was a void disposition under s.127. The supplier loses the cash, cannot recover the consumed goods, and must rank as an unsecured creditor, ultimately recovering pennies in the pound.
Creditor Action Framework
Professionals with financial exposure to Mindex Limited should execute the following steps immediately:
1. Quantify exposure: Calculate total outstanding ledger balances and identify any goods currently in transit.
2. Review security: Run a company charge check to establish the hierarchy of secured creditors holding fixed or floating charges over the company's assets.
3. Halt credit lines: Suspend further unsecured supply until the petition is formally dismissed or the company obtains a validation order from the court.
4. Seek legal counsel: If payments have been received since the petition was presented, consult an insolvency solicitor regarding potential clawback risks.
5. Monitor the outcome: Track the 22 July 2026 hearing to determine if the petition is dismissed, adjourned, or results in a compulsory winding-up order.
Intelligence Gathering: Manual vs Corp Intel
Traditionally, credit controllers and solicitors monitor insolvency risk by manually checking the daily High Court cause lists, waiting for statutory notices to appear in The Gazette, or pulling ad-hoc credit reports. This manual cadence creates a dangerous blind spot. By law, a petition cannot be advertised in The Gazette until at least seven business days after it is served on the company. During this window, counterparties continue trading blindly.
Using Corp Intel, professionals automate this risk detection. By setting up free company monitoring, users receive immediate alerts when a petition hits the court list, closing the gap between presentation and public advertisement. Furthermore, running a proactive winding up petition search across a client portfolio instantly highlights hidden insolvency risks, allowing credit teams to halt supply and mitigate s.127 exposure before a liquidator is appointed.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.