Lifestyle Residences Limited Winding-Up Petition Hearing Listed for August 2026
A petition to wind up property developer Lifestyle Residences Limited (company number 10172067) is scheduled for hearing in the High Court of Justice on 12 August 2026 at 11:00 am. The case, filed under reference CR-2026-004989, will be heard in Court 1 of the Rolls Building in London before a High Court judge sitting in the Companies Court.
Hearing details
The table below summarises the listing details sourced from the published court cause list:
| Attribute | Details |
| --- | --- |
| Court | High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts (Companies Court) |
| Venue | Rolls Building, Court 1, 7 Rolls Buildings, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL |
| Date and Time | 12 August 2026 at 11:00 am |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-004989 |
| Action Type | Petition for compulsory winding-up |
| Subject Entity | Lifestyle Residences Limited (10172067) |
A winding-up petition represents formal court proceedings initiated under s.122(1)(f) of the Insolvency Act 1986, which empowers the court to liquidate a company if it is unable to pay its debts. Creditors frequently present such petitions following the expiry of a statutory demand for payment under s.123 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or following an unsatisfied enforcement order. You can view the full court listings on the official cause list or examine the daily list of winding-up petitions.
Company snapshot
Lifestyle Residences Limited was incorporated on 10 May 2016 under company registration number 10172067. According to statutory records maintained at the Companies House register, the business operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 41100, covering the development of building projects.
| Registry Field | Official Record |
| --- | --- |
| Company Name | LIFESTYLE RESIDENCES LIMITED |
| Company Number | 10172067 |
| Incorporation Date | 10 May 2016 |
| Company Status | Active |
| Registered Office | Mason House, First Floor, 18 Lower Teddington Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 4EU |
| Primary Industry | 41100 (Development of building projects) |
In property development operations, corporate entities often hold significant real estate assets or fixed charges granted to senior lenders. Creditors and commercial counterparties should conduct a comprehensive company charge check to assess existing debentures, mortgages, and fixed or floating charges registered against the company's property.
Directors and ownership
Public filings indicate that the business operates from its registered office in Kingston Upon Thames. Corporate intelligence reviews of property development firms typically involve scrutinising past filing history, changes in directorships, and personal solvent guarantees that may have been issued to secured lenders.
Under the Companies Act 2006, directors carry statutory duties to act in the best interests of creditors when a business faces potential insolvency. Lenders and trade creditors assessing liability exposure should review the filing history to determine whether annual accounts or confirmation statements have been delivered punctually.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
Statutory notices regarding petitions must be published in The Gazette in accordance with Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016. Publication serves as formal legal notice to financial institutions, trade suppliers, and other creditors.
Once a winding-up petition is advertised in The Gazette, commercial banks routinely freeze the target entity's bank accounts to prevent potential liability under statutory asset distribution provisions. Creditors seeking to verify whether additional petitions or insolvency orders exist against this entity or associated entities should execute a direct winding up petition search.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition has immediate legal consequences under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Under this section, any disposition of the company's property, including payments made from its bank accounts, made after the petition date is void in the event that a winding-up order is subsequently made, unless validated by court order.
Step-by-step counterparty risk action plan
1. Verify court status: Perform an immediate legal search to confirm the petition filing date, case reference, and petitioner details.
2. Review trade credit exposure: Freeze further credit facilities and halt deliveries of goods or services on deferred payment terms.
3. Audit contract terms: Review retention of title (ROT) provisions and contractual termination clauses triggered by insolvency process filings.
4. Monitor ongoing corporate changes: Implement free company monitoring to receive immediate alerts regarding registry updates or judicial orders.
5. Consider formal representation: Seek independent legal advice on whether to file a notice of support or opposition ahead of the listed court date.
Worked legal scenario
Consider an unbonded sub-contractor that continues delivering materials valued at £35,000 to a residential development site after a winding-up petition has been presented against the developer. If the High Court grants a compulsory winding-up order at the hearing, all electronic funds transferred by the developer to the sub-contractor post-petition are legally void under Section 127. The court-appointed liquidator can demand the return of those funds to the liquidation estate, leaving the sub-contractor as an unsecured creditor competing for dividend distribution.
How to investigate further
Historically, legal professionals and credit managers spent hours cross-referencing court cause lists, requesting manual High Court file searches, inspecting physical registers at Companies House, and monitoring print editions of The Gazette. Modern corporate risk assessment requires integrated intelligence.
Corp Intel combines court listing entries, Companies House register data, land registry charge indexes, and statutory Gazette filings into unified monitoring streams. This allows credit risk teams and legal advisors to detect winding-up filings early, enforce debt recovery measures, and protect enterprise balance sheets against counterparty insolvency.
FAQ
What happens at a High Court winding-up petition hearing?
At the listed hearing, the Companies Court judge considers the petition alongside any evidence submitted by the petitioning creditor, supporting creditors, or the company. The judge may grant a winding-up order, adjourn the proceedings to a later date, or dismiss the petition if the debt has been settled or is subject to a genuine substantial dispute.
Does a listed petition mean the company is automatically insolvent?
No. A court listing reflects the presentation of a petition by a party claiming an unpaid debt. It is not a judicial finding of insolvency. The legal outcome depends on the evidence presented to the court at the scheduled hearing.
Can a trade supplier recover goods delivered after a petition presentation?
Recovery depends on the terms of trade and the existence of a valid, enforceable Retention of Title (ROT) clause. Suppliers must act quickly before goods are commingled or disposed of by the company or an appointed official receiver.
How can creditors monitor whether a winding-up order is granted?
Creditors can monitor court rolls or configure direct registry alerts. Setting up free company monitoring provides real-time notifications when new filings, court orders, or insolvency notices are registered against the target business.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.