Kuyamoto Ltd Listed for Winding-Up Petition Hearing in High Court
A winding-up petition against London-based restaurant operator Kuyamoto Ltd has been listed for hearing in the High Court of Justice on 19 August 2026. The matter (case reference CR-2026-004757) will be heard at 11:00 am in Court 1 of the Rolls Building under the jurisdiction of the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Companies Court.
Public filings reveal that the company is currently subject to an active proposal to strike off at Companies House, creating a parallel regulatory and judicial timeline that counterparties, suppliers, and trade creditors must carefully monitor.
Hearing details
The details of the upcoming court appearance as published on the High Court cause list are summarized below:
| Attribute | Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Kuyamoto Ltd |
| Company Number | 12234855 |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-004757 |
| Court Division | High Court of Justice, Companies Court (Winding-Up List) |
| Hearing Date & Time | 19 August 2026 at 11:00 am |
| Venue | Court 1, Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL |
| Matter Type | Winding-up Petition |
Counterparties tracking the proceedings can cross-reference the court calendar against the daily official roll and review today's winding-up list for scheduling updates.
Company snapshot
Kuyamoto Ltd was incorporated on 30 September 2019 under company number 12234855. Its registered office is listed on the public register as 70 Mottingham Road, London, N9 8ED. The entity operates under standard industrial classification (SIC) code 56101, designating licensed restaurants.
Full registration records and public filings for the corporate entity can be reviewed directly on the Kuyamoto Ltd Corp Intel Profile.
According to records at Companies House, the business currently holds an active corporate status marked as "active - proposal to strike off". Statutory strike-off notices are typically initiated by the Registrar of Companies under section 1000 of the Companies Act 2006 when a company appears to have ceased trading or has defaulted on mandatory filing obligations, such as annual accounts or confirmation statements.
Directors and ownership
Under statutory requirements, public corporate records disclose active director appointments, registered persons with significant control (PSCs), and historic filings lodged at Companies House. Commercial counterparties assessing credit exposure should cross-verify the officer register to confirm current managerial responsibility and determine whether any secondary entities share common directorships.
Prior to entering into new credit agreements or extending trade terms, commercial partners should run a complete company charge check to determine whether assets or property are subject to fixed or floating charges held by secured lenders.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
The co-existence of an administrative strike-off proposal and a High Court winding-up petition presents a specific procedural situation under UK insolvency law. When a creditor presents a winding-up petition under section 124 of the Insolvency Act 1986, the court process takes precedence over administrative dissolution.
If the petitioning creditor or Registrar places a notice in The Gazette, administrative dissolution is suspended to allow judicial determination of the petition. If a winding-up order is ultimately granted, the court-appointed official receiver or liquidator assumes control of company assets, overriding any pending strike-off action.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
When a company faces a listed petition for a winding-up order, section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 applies retroactively from the date the petition was formally presented. Section 127 mandates that any disposition of company property, transfer of shares, or alteration in the status of company members made after the presentation of the petition is void unless validated by court order.
Practical Risk Scenario
Consider an equipment supplier supplying goods on 30-day credit terms to a restaurant operator facing a petition. If the court grants a compulsory winding-up order, payments received by the supplier after the petition presentation date could be deemed void under s.127. The liquidator may require the creditor to return those funds to the insolvency estate unless a court validation order was obtained beforehand.
Action Checklist for Commercial Counterparties
To protect commercial interests when dealing with a counterparty named in petition listings, legal advisors and credit controllers recommend the following step-by-step approach:
1. Freeze unsecured credit extensions: Immediately convert trade terms to cash-on-delivery (COD) or pro-forma payments to limit further exposure.
2. Conduct immediate register checks: Execute a comprehensive winding up petition search across public registers to confirm petition dates and advertising details.
3. Audit outstanding invoices: Reconcile open balances and identify any payments received after the petition presentation date.
4. Review retention of title (ROT) clauses: Verify if existing supplier contracts include enforceable ROT provisions for delivered goods or inventory currently on site.
5. Establish corporate monitoring alerts: Set up automated tracking through free company monitoring to receive real-time notifications regarding changes to filing statuses or judicial orders.
How to investigate further
To conduct comprehensive due diligence on Kuyamoto Ltd or monitor ongoing High Court developments:
- Access public filing histories directly through Companies House.
- Track statutory advertisements published in The Gazette.
- Perform a targeted winding up petition search across UK court registries via Corp Intel.
FAQ
What happens when a company faces both a strike-off proposal and a winding-up petition?
The judicial process takes priority. When a winding-up petition is presented in the High Court, the court or petitioning creditor notifies the Registrar of Companies to suspend administrative strike-off under section 1000 of the Companies Act 2006. This ensures assets are preserved for liquidation rather than dissolved administratively.
Can a company trade while listed for a winding-up petition hearing?
A company retains its corporate status until an order is made by the court. However, section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 renders post-petition dispositions of property void without court validation, making bank accounts subject to operational freezes once financial institutions become aware of the listing.
How can creditors submit claims if a winding-up order is made?
If the High Court grants a winding-up order on 19 August 2026, the Official Receiver or an appointed insolvency practitioner will be placed in charge. Creditors must submit a formal proof of debt form detailing outstanding amounts owed to participate in dividend distributions from liquidated assets.
How frequently should credit risk teams refresh counterparty checks?
Credit controllers and risk managers should continuously track counterparties using real-time data services, as court cause lists and compulsory strike-off notices are updated daily.
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.