Jamett Properties Limited: Judgment Hearing Listed at the Rolls Building
A judgment hearing concerning Jamett Properties Limited was listed for 14 July 2026 at 10:30am in the Insolvency and Companies Court at the Rolls Building in London. Under case reference CR-2024-003376, the High Court convened to hear final arguments or hand down a reserved decision involving the East London real estate entity.
Hearing details
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Jamett Properties Limited |
| Company Number | 00741336 |
| Case Number | CR-2024-003376 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court (Chancery Division) |
| Venue | The Rolls Building, Court 4, London |
| Date | 14 July 2026 |
| Time | 10:30am |
| Hearing Type | Judgment |
Company snapshot
Incorporated on 19 November 1962, Jamett Properties Limited is an active private limited company operating under SIC code 68100, covering the buying and selling of own real estate. Public filings on the Companies House register record the registered office address at Unit 1 Lusty Industrial Estate, Empson Street, Bow, London, E3 3LT.
With over six decades of continuous trading history, the company's balance sheet reflects historical real estate holding structures. When a long-established property investment entity appears on the High Court cause list, commercial counterparties must evaluate their direct exposure against potential contingent liabilities emerging from legal disputes.
Directors and ownership
Public filings establish that ultimate control of Jamett Properties Limited is registered under Persons with Significant Control (PSC) statutory disclosures as follows:
- Mr James Lee Taylor holds between 50% and 75% of shares and voting rights, notified on 6 April 2016.
- Mr Joseph Mark Taylor holds between 25% and 50% of shares and voting rights, notified on 6 April 2016.
This distribution reflects concentrated private ownership held by long-term individual controllers.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
Public records show no recent winding-up advertisements published in The Gazette in connection with case CR-2024-003376. Within Chancery Division practice, a High Court judgment listing without prior public advertisement frequently occurs when a company files an application for an injunction to restrain advertisement under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, or where the court determines substantive preliminary legal issues concerning a disputed debt.
To confirm whether formal insolvency proceedings have been initiated, risk professionals should perform a live winding up petition search or review today's winding up petitions list. Cross-referencing registry details on the court's official roll provides formal verification of case filings and orders.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
In the Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC), a hearing designated as a judgment indicates that the court is delivering a decisive ruling on an application or determining the final resolution of a dispute. Where insolvency proceedings are involved, commercial counterparties face specific statutory risks.
Statutory clawback under section 127
Under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of a company's property made after the presentation of a winding-up petition is void unless validated by order of the court. If a judgment hearing results in the making of a compulsory winding-up order, payments processed or assets transferred post-petition can be recovered by an appointed liquidator.
Practical risk assessment checklist
Lenders, trade vendors, and tenant counterparties exposed to an entity facing High Court litigation should implement the following response framework:
1. Verify secured status: Conduct a thorough company charge check to confirm that existing mortgages, fixed charges, or debentures are properly registered with priority at Companies House.
2. Evaluate credit exposure: Review payment terms, suspend open credit accounts, and require prepayment for ongoing services or property transactions.
3. Monitor court dockets: Re-check daily cause lists for the Rolls Building and regional Chancery centres to identify adjournments, injunction orders, or final decisions.
4. Inspect contractual default terms: Review underlying loan facilities, joint venture agreements, or commercial property contracts for termination triggers linked to legal proceedings or insolvency filings.
Worked example: Counterparty exposure in corporate real estate
Consider a commercial tenant leasing industrial space from a corporate landlord facing a judgment listing in the ICC. Upon identifying the cause list entry, the tenant's legal team assesses whether rent payments rendered after an unadvertised petition date could face voidance under s.127.
Rather than withholding rent and triggering lease forfeiture, the tenant requests formal written clarification from the landlord's solicitors regarding the status of case CR-2024-003376, including whether a validation order has been sought. Concurrently, the tenant establishes automated monitoring to track formal statutory register updates.
Traditional monitoring vs Corp Intel
Historically, legal teams and corporate credit managers tracked High Court proceedings through manual court list inspections published late each afternoon. This required cross-referencing company names against public registers, placing telephone inquiries with the court registry, and manually searching paper records. This manual workflow creates operational blind spots and exposes organisations to unexpected counterparty default.
Corp Intel automates this process by integrating High Court cause lists, Gazette entries, and Companies House records into a continuous intelligence pipeline. By deploying free company monitoring, credit and risk management professionals receive automated alerts the moment a counterparty appears in High Court cause lists, enabling prompt and defensible decision-making.
How to investigate further
To conduct further due diligence regarding Jamett Properties Limited or related legal proceedings, review the following resources:
- Access the detailed company intelligence profile via Corp Intel's Jamett Properties Limited search.
- Conduct a real-time cause list lookup using the winding up search tool.
- Inspect daily High Court listings on today's winding up petitions list.
- Verify statutory court status entries using the official roll.
FAQ
What takes place during a judgment hearing in the Insolvency and Companies Court?
A judgment hearing is scheduled for the judge to hand down a formal written or oral decision, or to hear final closing submissions on a disputed application or petition.
Does a cause list entry prove that the company is insolvent?
No. A court listing represents a procedural scheduling entry. The entity may be successfully disputing an unproven debt, seeking an injunction, or presenting arguments regarding preliminary legal points.
What are the consequences of section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986?
Section 127 invalidates dispositions of company property made after a winding-up petition is presented, unless the High Court grants a validation order allowing the transaction.
Why would a judgment hearing occur without a notice in The Gazette?
If a company disputes a petition on substantial debt grounds, it may obtain an interim court order restraining public advertisement in The Gazette while the dispute is heard.
How can creditors verify security ahead of legal proceedings?
Creditors can inspect registered mortgages, debentures, and fixed or floating charges by executing a company charge check.
How can businesses maintain automated tracking on High Court cases?
Risk teams can establish automated daily tracking by enrolling in free company monitoring to receive immediate risk alerts upon any public court filing.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.