Jaeger Wrexham Holdings Listed for Winding-Up Petition Hearing
A winding-up petition against JAEGER WREXHAM HOLDINGS LIMITED is listed for hearing on 28 August 2026 at 10:30am before the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (Companies Court). The matter, filed under case number CR-2026-002372, appears on the court cause list within the non-attendance list.
Hearing details
The table below outlines the hearing parameters extracted from the published HM Courts & Tribunals Service cause list:
| Attribute | Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Number | CR-2026-002372 |
| Target Company | JAEGER WREXHAM HOLDINGS LIMITED |
| Company Number | 13886577 |
| Court | High Court of Justice (Companies Winding Up) |
| Hearing Date & Time | 28 August 2026 at 10:30am |
| Venue / List | Non-attendance list |
| Case Type | Insolvency / Winding-Up Petition |
Hearings designated on the non-attendance list typically involve un-opposed petitions or procedural steps where oral advocacy is not required unless directed by the presiding judge or Registrar. Interested parties monitoring the official roll should note that court listings remain subject to variation prior to the scheduled hearing time.
Company snapshot
JAEGER WREXHAM HOLDINGS LIMITED is an active private limited company incorporated on 1 February 2022. According to the official register at Companies House, the business operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 96090, which covers "Other service activities not elsewhere classified".
The registered office address recorded on the public register is:
7 Brantwood Road, Salford, England, M7 4EN.
Under the Companies Act 2006, corporate entities must maintain accurate filings regarding their officers, registered address, and annual statutory financial accounts. Holding companies operating under generic service classifications often hold equity stakes or manage asset portfolios for operating subsidiaries, making due diligence on their underlying legal structure essential for risk managers.
Directors and public records
Public filing history indicates the company has fulfilled basic administrative obligations since incorporation in early 2022. Directors and officers registered at Companies House bear statutory duties under sections 170 to 177 of the Companies Act 2006 to promote the success of the company and maintain proper accounting records.
When a petition for compulsory winding-up is presented, the petitioning creditor asserts that the company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due within the meaning of section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Company filings should be reviewed alongside secured debt registrations to understand the order of priority among creditors. A routine company charge check reveals whether fixed or floating charges have been created over company assets in favour of commercial lenders or institutional investors.
Recent filings and statutory notifications
Official public notices regarding compulsory liquidations and winding-up petitions are published in The Gazette. The formal advertisement of a petition usually occurs no less than seven business days after service on the target company and at least seven business days prior to the court hearing date, in accordance with the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.
Prior to entering commercial transactions or extending credit lines, credit risk officers routinely perform a winding up petition search to identify pending court proceedings that may not yet appear on standard company registry files.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a petition creates substantial legal risks for commercial counterparties. Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 provides that any disposition of the company's property made after the commencement of the winding-up (the date the petition was presented) is void unless the High Court makes a validating order.
Practical Counterparty Action Plan
Commercial counterparties holding active trading terms or contract negotiations with the target company should follow a structured review process:
1. Verify Court Status: Confirm case details via today's winding-up list and cross-reference the court case reference CR-2026-002372.
2. Freeze Unsecured Credit: Switch active commercial terms to advance payment (Pro Forma) or cash-on-delivery (COD) to prevent exposure under section 127 voidable transactions.
3. Assert Retention of Title (RoT): Suppliers of physical inventory should inspect existing contracts to enforce valid retention of title clauses for unpaid goods.
4. Establish Automated Intelligence Alerts: Implement free company monitoring to track changes in Companies House records, officer resignations, or formal winding-up orders.
5. Evaluate Validation Order Requirements: If ongoing trading is commercially critical, seek legal counsel to determine whether a court validation order under section 127 is necessary to protect post-petition payments.
Realistic Counterparty Scenario
Consider a commercial supplier contracted to supply £30,000 worth of specialised services or equipment to a holding enterprise on 30-day credit terms. If the supplier delivers goods or services after a winding-up petition has been presented without knowledge of the court filing, and a compulsory winding-up order is subsequently made by the court, the transaction may be voided under section 127. The liquidator can demand repayment or recovery of assets, leaving the supplier as an unsecured creditor competing for a dividend in the insolvency distribution.
How to investigate further
Corporate intelligence analysts and insolvency practitioners traditionally complete background verification through manual searches across multiple official sources: checking the Companies House register via GOV.UK, monitoring weekly notices in The Gazette, and cross-referencing daily High Court chancery lists.
Corp Intel streamlines this multi-stage workflow by aggregating court cause lists, company filings, charges, and statutory notices into a single real-time intelligence system. Risk professionals can run a targeted winding up petition search to verify counterparty standing before approving credit terms or executing corporate agreements.
FAQ
What does a non-attendance winding-up listing indicate?
A non-attendance listing on the High Court Chancery cause list means the petition is being dealt with on paper or in a list where parties are not required to give oral evidence in open court unless requested. It frequently applies to administrative adjournments, dismissals by consent, or unopposed petitions.
Does the filing of a winding-up petition mean the company is insolvent?
No. The presentation of a petition is a formal legal step by a creditor asserting an unpaid debt. Insolvency is a legal determination made by the court upon hearing the evidence. Petitions may be dismissed, withdrawn, or resolved prior to a final order.
What happens if the court grants a winding-up order on 28 August 2026?
If a winding-up order is granted, the court appoints the Official Receiver as liquidator (unless an insolvency practitioner is immediately appointed). The company's management powers cease, bank accounts are frozen, and the liquidator assumes control to realise assets for distribution to creditors.
How can suppliers protect themselves during pending petition proceedings?
Suppliers should review existing contract terms, require cash in advance for ongoing deliveries, enforce retention of title provisions where applicable, and monitor court cause lists to stay informed on the petition outcome.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.