Iz Energy Services Ltd: Insolvency and Companies Court Hearing CR-2026-004234
On 24 August 2026, IZ Energy Services Ltd appeared before the High Court Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) in London under case reference CR-2026-004234. The matter was listed on the ICC interim list at 10:30am in Court 4 of the Rolls Building.
Hearing details
| Parameter | Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | IZ Energy Services Ltd |
| Company Number | 08801107 |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-004234 |
| Court | High Court Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) |
| Hearing Date | 24 August 2026 |
| Hearing Time | 10:30am |
| Venue | Court 4, The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London |
| List Type | ICC Interim List |
Listings on the High Court ICC interim list involve urgent applications, interim directions, or procedural disputes governed by the Insolvency Act 1986 or the Companies Act 2006. Common applications before the court include seeking an injunction to restrain the presentation or advertisement of a winding-up petition, disputes regarding statutory demands, applications for validation orders under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, or company restoration orders.
Company snapshot
IZ Energy Services Ltd was incorporated on 3 December 2013 under registration number 08801107. Official entries maintained on the Companies House register confirm that the corporate status remains active. The registered office address is Unit 2 & 3 Muirhead Quays, Fresh Wharf Estate, Barking, Essex, IG11 7BG.
Although no formal Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code is recorded on the statutory register, financial filings state that the principal business activity relates to the production and supply of goods and associated administrative operations. Accounts for the period ending 31 December 2024 disclose net assets of £943,885 and an average employee count of 59. This compares with net assets of £750,064 and 50 employees reported for the prior period ending 14 October 2024. Neither filing carries an auditor qualification or going-concern modification on the public record.
Directors and ownership
Public filings under the Person with Significant Control (PSC) statutory framework outline the company's recorded ownership and governance structure:
- Qutab Holding Limited: Registered as a corporate Person with Significant Control on 21 January 2022. The filing records ownership of 75% to 100% of company shares and voting rights, alongside the power to appoint or remove a majority of the board of directors.
- Mr Muhammad Irfan: Recorded as an individual Person with Significant Control holding 25% to 50% of share rights from 6 April 2016 until a cessation was filed on 21 January 2022.
Establishing corporate control hierarchies and verifying ultimate beneficial owners is a standard procedure when credit risk analysts evaluate counterparty exposure, cross-guarantees, and group connections.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
Prior to adjusting commercial credit limits or initiating enforcement action, corporate risk managers examine statutory announcements published in The Gazette alongside official High Court cause listings.
An appearance on the ICC interim list frequently indicates ongoing procedural litigation connected to winding-up proceedings under s.124 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Where a company successfully petitions the court for an interim injunction to restrain advertisement, petition details are excluded from publication in The Gazette. Conversely, if the court refuses or dismisses the application, public advertisement usually follows, giving formal notice to financial institutions and commercial creditors.
To verify whether a petition or statutory order has been registered against a trading entity, credit managers conduct a targeted winding up search or review the daily winding-up petitions list.
How to run a winding up petition search
Credit control managers and legal advisers require a systematic workflow to monitor counterparty litigation risk prior to public advertisement. Running a comprehensive winding up petition search involves five core steps:
1. Inspect High Court listings: Review daily cause lists for the Insolvency and Companies Court to identify scheduled interim applications or petition hearings.
2. Check statutory announcements: Monitor published entries in The Gazette for winding-up petitions, court orders, or insolvency practitioner appointments.
3. Review registered security: Conduct a thorough company charge check on Companies House to evaluate fixed and floating charges created under corporate debentures.
4. Query court records: Search High Court and County Court registries via the official roll to confirm whether formal petition proceedings have been issued.
5. Implement automated alerting: Set up free company monitoring to receive immediate automated notifications regarding filing updates, director changes, or charge registrations.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
A listing on the High Court ICC interim list serves as a prompt for commercial credit control teams to review trading exposures and verify contract security terms.
Under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of company property, including outward electronic bank transfers, and any transfer of shares made after the presentation of a winding-up petition is void unless validated by court order. Commercial banks routinely freeze corporate accounts upon learning of a petition to prevent exposure to unvalidated transfers. This account freeze restricts the company's ability to settle supplier invoices or meet operational overheads.
Scenario: Commercial creditor response to cause list intelligence
Consider an industrial equipment supplier holding £60,000 in outstanding invoices for delivered goods. The supplier's credit analyst identifies the customer listed on the High Court cause list prior to any advertisement appearing in The Gazette.
The supplier immediately suspends open credit lines. A review of public filings reveals an existing floating charge held by an institutional lender, indicating that unsecured recovery in liquidation would be uncertain. The supplier's legal counsel verifies that their supply agreement includes an enforceable Retention of Title clause. By acting promptly on cause list intelligence before corporate bank accounts are frozen, the creditor reclaims £22,000 of identifiable, unmixed inventory from the customer's depot, mitigating potential balance sheet losses.
For credit teams and suppliers
When a trading counterparty appears on the High Court cause list, credit managers must make swift, defensible decisions regarding open lines of credit and pending deliveries. Extending uncollateralised terms without checking pending court applications risks exposure under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, where post-petition payments may be set aside. Performing a routine winding up search allows credit officers to protect asset positions before banking facilities are restricted.
How to investigate further
Gathering legal and credit due diligence across separate databases requires continuous manual checking. Analysts must inspect High Court cause lists, monitor Gazette notices, verify Companies House filings, and contact court registries to confirm hearing results.
Manual review runs the risk of missing critical developments during short procedural windows. Corp Intel unifies court cause lists, statutory notices, and corporate register updates into a single intelligence platform. Credit professionals can track court applications, monitor counterparty solvency, and evaluate corporate risk efficiently.
FAQ
What is the High Court ICC interim list?
The Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) interim list hears urgent applications, procedural directions, and emergency injunction requests under the Insolvency Act 1986 and Companies Act 2006. Common matters include applications to restrain petition advertisement, dispute statutory demands, or apply for validation orders.
Does a court cause list entry confirm that a company is insolvent?
No. A listing on the cause list confirms that a legal application or hearing has been scheduled before the court. It does not constitute a judicial finding of insolvency or guarantee that a winding-up order will be made.
What is the legal effect of section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986?
Section 127 provides that any disposition of company property made after the formal presentation of a winding-up petition is void unless validated by the court. This leads commercial banks to freeze bank accounts upon learning of a petition.
Why might a petition not appear in The Gazette?
If a company obtains an interim injunction restraining advertisement, petition details cannot be published in The Gazette while the injunction remains active. The matter may be listed on the court cause list under an interim reference while the court considers the application.
How quickly do banks freeze accounts after a winding-up petition?
Financial institutions typically freeze corporate bank accounts as soon as they receive notice of a winding-up petition, whether through direct notification, cause list intelligence, or Gazette advertisement, to avoid liability for post-petition dispositions.
What steps should a supplier take upon identifying a cause list entry?
A supplier should review existing credit limits, halt further uncollateralised deliveries, verify contract terms regarding Retention of Title, and run a winding up search to establish current petition status.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.