Imsolutions Holdings Faces Petition Filing
A court filing concerning IMSOLUTIONS HOLDINGS LIMITED was registered on 20 October 2026 at the Central Registry under case number CR-2026-008134. The presentation or recording of an application at court is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome of any formal petition or application remains a matter for the court to decide upon hearing.
Commercial counterparties tracking high-risk entries on the court rolls monitor these initial listings to assess counterparties well before formal hearing advertisements appear. For daily tracking of court filings, practitioners review the daily winding up petitions list.
Petition details
The entry on the HMCTS CE-File electronic filing system reflects the following parameters:
| Detail | Court Record |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | IMSOLUTIONS HOLDINGS LIMITED |
| Court Case Number | CR-2026-008134 |
| Filing Date | 20 October 2026 |
| Case Type | Companies - Pre-action Application - Application for pre action disclosure |
| Court Registry | Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions (CE-File public search) |
| Petitioner Identity | [Shown in the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Alleged Debt / Sum | [Check the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
| Hearing Date | [Check the creditor report →](#offers-creditor) |
Although recorded on the Companies Court register (CR prefix), the formal case type specifies a pre-action disclosure application under company jurisdiction. The underlying claim, petitioner identity, and debt amount (if applicable) are not stated in the published source.
Company snapshot
Public filings from Companies House confirm the corporate standing of the company:
- Registered Company Name: IMSOLUTIONS HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Company Registration Number: 11869316
- Incorporation Date: 8 March 2019
- Company Status: Active
- Registered Office: Suite C Regent House Wolseley Road, Kempston, Bedford, England, MK42 7NY
- Nature of Business (SIC): 70229 (Management consultancy activities other than financial management)
- Latest Financials: Not stated in the supplied source
Further corporate disclosures can be verified directly on the Imsolutions Holdings Limited profile on Corp Intel.
Directors and ownership
Companies House records document six currently active directors and one person with significant control. Public register facts confirm appointments as follows:
- Aleks Ilic, director, appointed 23 May 2019. Born February 1968, British nationality, resident in England.
- James William Kavanagh, director, appointed 23 May 2019. Born March 1985, British nationality, resident in England.
- Andrew Mark Tunnicliffe, director, appointed 23 May 2019. Born May 1961, British nationality, resident in England.
- Louise Marie Tunnicliffe, director, appointed 23 May 2019. Born August 1968, British nationality, resident in England.
- Courtney Worboys, director, appointed 23 May 2019. Born August 1986, British nationality, resident in England.
- Simon Charles Young, director, appointed 8 March 2019. Born February 1973, British nationality, resident in England.
According to the register of Persons with Significant Control (PSC), Mr Simon Charles Young was notified on 8 March 2019 as holding:
- Ownership of shares: 50% to 75%
- Voting rights: 50% to 75%
- Voting rights as trustee: 50% to 75%
- Voting rights as firm: 50% to 75%
No secretary is recorded in the supplied registry extract. These entries represent public register facts; individual officers are not personally linked to court filings or determinations of solvency.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
Under statutory procedures governed by the Insolvency Act 1986 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, formal winding-up petitions require advertisement in The Gazette no sooner than seven business days after service, unless the court orders otherwise.
No prior Gazette notices were identified in the supplied record for this company. The filing under CR-2026-008134 represents an initial entry on the court system.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
When a court record appears under the Companies Court roll, commercial risk teams typically treat it as a trigger for defensive portfolio review. A standard winding up petition search or Companies Court registry search identifies these filings weeks before insolvency notices reach the general public.
Creditors and commercial counterparties evaluate their counterparty risk using the following framework:
1. Verify Contractual Status: Identify all active purchase orders, unbilled services, and pending deliverable milestones.
2. Review Payment Terms: Tighten discretionary credit lines, request pro-forma billing, or seek cash on delivery where contractual covenants allow.
3. Assess Insolvency Exposure: Under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, if a formal winding-up petition is subsequently presented and an order is made, dispositions of the company's property made after petition presentation are void unless validated by the court under a validation order. Parties receiving company payments should review whether a winding-up petition has been presented or if this entry remains restricted to pre-action disclosure.
4. Monitor Ongoing Cause Lists: Check subsequent court listings to establish whether the application progresses to a contested hearing, is struck out, or is followed by substantive creditor action.
Practical risk assessment scenario
Consider an equipment supplier with £45,000 outstanding across 60-day invoices. Running a routine winding up petition search flags that an action has been filed at the Central Registry under case number CR-2026-008134.
Rather than stopping performance outright or breaching terms, the supplier's credit manager immediately pauses extended discretionary limits, audits retention of title clauses on recently delivered stock, and requests an updated ledger review. By acting at the filing stage rather than waiting for formal Gazette advertisement, the supplier avoids compounding unprotected post-filing credit.
Investigating through Corp Intel
Traditionally, verifying status across multiple counterparties requires manual, fragmented checks: phoning the Royal Courts of Justice Rolls Building search desk, paying for individual CE-File document downloads, searching The Gazette archives, and checking Companies House filing histories. This process is time-consuming and often misses entries filed in the preceding 24 hours.
Corp Intel consolidates court registry rolls, statutory notices, and corporate registers into an integrated stream. Credit managers and legal teams can set up free company monitoring on counterparties to receive instant alerts when new entries, charges, or Gazette notices are published.
For a broader audit across other commercial partners, teams can execute a targeted winding up search to ensure potential insolvency risks are captured before entering material contracts.
For credit teams and suppliers
Pre-completion and pre-credit checks are critical before agreeing to significant exposure or unsecured trade credit. Discovering a court filing after providing credit can result in clawback risks or unrecoverable bad debts if proceedings escalate into formal liquidation. Confirming that counterparty files are clean through a targeted search provides defensible documentation for audit and credit committee sign-off.
FAQ
What does case prefix 'CR' indicate on CE-File?
The CR prefix identifies cases filed within the Companies Court (Insolvency and Companies List) of the High Court of Justice in London. This roll includes winding-up petitions, schemes of arrangement, capital reductions, and pre-action applications involving corporate bodies.
Is an application for pre-action disclosure the same as a winding-up order?
No. A pre-action disclosure application is a procedural step under Civil Procedure Rules (CPR 31.16) where one party requests documents prior to issuing substantive legal proceedings. A winding-up order is a final judgment that places a company into compulsory liquidation. Review the guidance on winding up orders for further details.
How does a company respond if a winding-up petition is threatened?
A company that receives a statutory demand or threat of petition must take immediate legal advice. Remedies include paying an undisputed debt, applying for an injunction to restrain advertisement or presentation if the debt is genuinely disputed on substantial grounds, or proposing an alternative restructuring process. Further details are outlined in our guide on how to stop a winding up petition.
How long after a petition is presented does a hearing occur?
When a formal winding-up petition is accepted by the court, a hearing date is typically listed between 6 and 10 weeks later, subject to court capacity. Notice must be served on the company, and statutory advertising rules in The Gazette apply before the hearing.
Disclaimer
This report summarises a petition recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.