Imagine Design & Build Ltd: High Court Application Hearing Listed
A hearing concerning Imagine Design & Build Ltd has been listed for 13 July 2026 at 11:30 am in the High Court of Justice. The matter, registered under case number CR-2026-002649, is scheduled to be heard remotely via Microsoft Teams before the Insolvency and Companies Court.
This listing follows the company's transition into a formal insolvency process. When a company is already in liquidation, applications to the court typically involve directions sought by the liquidator, challenges to creditor claims, or specific enforcement powers brought under the Insolvency Act 1986. For professionals managing exposure to the construction and design sector, tracking these post-insolvency court applications is a critical component of debt recovery strategy.
Hearing details
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Name | Imagine Design & Build Ltd |
| Case Number | CR-2026-002649 |
| Date | 13 July 2026 |
| Time | 11:30 am |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Venue | Remotely via MS Teams |
| Case Type | Application |
Company snapshot
Imagine Design & Build Ltd was incorporated on 23 May 2019. The company operates under SIC code 74100, which designates specialised design activities. According to the Companies House register, the entity's status is currently listed as 'Liquidation'.
- Company Number: 12015180
- Registered Office: 18A Capricorn Centre, Cranes Farm Road, Basildon, Essex, SS14 3JJ
- Incorporation Date: 23 May 2019
- Current Status: Liquidation
Financial filings for the period ending 31 May 2022 indicated the company was operating as a small entity prior to its insolvency. Professionals reviewing the file should note any outstanding company charge check results to determine the hierarchy of secured versus unsecured creditors before committing further resources to recovery efforts.
Expert analysis: post-liquidation applications
When a company in liquidation appears on the court cause list for an 'application', it signifies that specific legal intervention is required to progress the winding-up process. Liquidators do not apply to the court lightly, as doing so incurs legal costs that deplete the asset pool.
Common reasons for these applications include requests for the court to exercise its powers under Section 234 (getting in company property) or Section 236 (inquiry into the company's dealings) of the Insolvency Act 1986. Alternatively, the application may involve a creditor challenging a liquidator's decision to reject a proof of debt.
Worked example: Section 236 examinations
Consider a composite scenario involving a regional construction firm in liquidation. The liquidator identifies £150,000 in unexplained transfers to a connected entity shortly before insolvency. The former directors refuse to provide the necessary accounting records. The liquidator files an application with the Insolvency and Companies Court under s.236 to compel the directors to attend a private examination and produce the documents. The outcome of this specific hearing directly dictates whether the £150,000 can be recovered and distributed to the unsecured creditors.
Risk management checklist for creditors
Creditors exposed to Imagine Design & Build Ltd should take immediate steps to protect their position:
1. Verify proof of debt: Ensure your claim has been formally submitted to the appointed liquidator, with all supporting invoices and contracts attached.
2. Monitor court outcomes: The result of case CR-2026-002649 may impact the total asset pool available for distribution. Track the hearing date and request updates from the liquidator.
3. Review security: Check the Companies House charges register to confirm if your interest (or a primary lender's interest) is registered and its priority ranking.
4. Assess contagion: Identify if the directors of Imagine Design & Build Ltd hold active appointments in other companies within your supply chain.
Traditional monitoring vs Corp Intel
Traditionally, credit controllers and insolvency practitioners track post-liquidation developments by manually searching The Gazette for statutory notices, cross-referencing Companies House filings, or calling the Rolls Building for cause list updates. This manual cadence is time-consuming and risks missing interim court applications that materially affect dividend prospects.
Corp Intel replaces this fragmented process by aggregating daily court lists, Gazette notices, and registry data into a single dashboard. Rather than running manual checks, professionals use free company monitoring to receive automated alerts the moment a connected entity files a new document, changes status, or appears on a court list.
How to investigate further
To conduct a thorough review of this entity or any other counterparty facing legal action, professionals should consult the central court cause lists and the Insolvency Service records. For a comprehensive view of pending litigation across a corporate group, a winding up petition search can identify if other creditors have initiated parallel actions against related entities.
FAQ
What does an 'application' hearing mean if the company is already in liquidation?
An application hearing in the Insolvency and Companies Court usually involves a specific request to the judge to resolve a dispute or grant a power that the liquidator cannot exercise unilaterally. This is distinct from the initial petition to wind up the company.
Can I attend a remote hearing via MS Teams?
High Court hearings are generally open to the public, including those held remotely. Interested parties usually need to contact the clerk to the sitting judge or the Rolls Building listing office to request the access link, citing the case number CR-2026-002649.
How do I find out who the liquidator is?
The liquidator's details are available on the 'Officers' or 'Filings' tab of the company's profile on the Companies House website, or via notices published in The Gazette. They are the primary point of contact for any creditor queries regarding the company's assets.
What happens if the court grants the application?
The outcome depends entirely on the nature of the application. If it relates to asset recovery, it may increase the funds available to creditors. If it relates to a procedural stay, it may delay the final dissolution of the company.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition or an application is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.