Hoban Waste Management Ltd Listed for Winding-Up Hearing
A compulsory winding-up petition against Hoban Waste Management Ltd (company number 08219298) was listed for hearing on 5 August 2026 at 11:00 am in Court 1 of the Rolls Building, London. Registered under case reference CR-2026-004664 in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (Companies Court), the petition was presented under the provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986.
Hearing details
| Attribute | Details |
| --- | --- |
| Case Number | CR-2026-004664 |
| Company Name | Hoban Waste Management Ltd |
| Registration Number | 08219298 |
| Hearing Date and Time | 5 August 2026 at 11:00 am |
| Court Venue | Court 1, Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London |
| Court Division | High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts (Companies Court) |
| Action Type | Compulsory Winding-Up Petition |
Company snapshot
Hoban Waste Management Ltd was incorporated on 18 September 2012 (company number 08219298). Its registered office is recorded at Chesney Wold, Bleak Hall, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK6 1NE on the official Companies House register. The business operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 38110 for non-hazardous waste collection and 38210 for non-hazardous waste treatment and disposal.
Public filings indicate that the business maintains active corporate status. Financial accounts filed for the period ending 1 July 2025 record net assets of £6,731,127 with an average headcount of 37 employees, compared to net assets of £6,160,842 and 26 employees for the period ending 3 June 2024. The filed financial statements carry an unqualified auditor opinion with no going-concern qualification flagged in the statutory filings.
Directors and ownership
Disclosures filed pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 set out the recorded Persons with Significant Control (PSC) for the company:
- Mr Michael Hoban: Individual PSC notified on 6 April 2016, holding share ownership of 75% to 100%.
- Mrd Claire Hoban: Individual PSC notified on 6 April 2016, holding share ownership of 25% to 50%, with cessation recorded on 1 September 2018.
- Mr Peter Francis Connolly: Individual PSC notified on 10 September 2018, holding share ownership of 25% to 50%, with cessation recorded on 24 April 2019.
Official filings record officer roles and PSC holdings as reported to the registrar. Information on public registers is published as submitted without independent verification by court reporters, and inclusion does not imply personal insolvency or misconduct.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
At the time of cause list publication, no separate statutory advertisement for Hoban Waste Management Ltd appears in The Gazette under this specific court reference. Petitioning creditors routinely publish notices in The Gazette following directions issued by the High Court pursuant to Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.
Credit control teams and legal advisers monitoring court listings should regularly review today's winding-up petitions list to identify pending court filings prior to formal statutory publication.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition under Section 122(1)(f) of the Insolvency Act 1986 significantly alters the legal conditions surrounding commercial transactions. Under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of company property, including bank transfers or asset dispositions made after the petition presentation date, is void if a compulsory winding-up order is subsequently granted by the court, unless validated under a court order.
Practical risk management framework for counterparties
Commercial counterparties and suppliers engaging with a respondent business should follow this structured review protocol:
1. Reconcile trade ledger exposure: Review open customer invoices, unbilled work in progress, and unfulfilled contract commitments to measure financial risk.
2. Examine registered security: Run a company charge check on Companies House to determine whether debentures, fixed charges, or floating charges exist over commercial assets.
3. Assess payment validity under Section 127: Verify whether payments received post-petition are protected by a validation order granted by the High Court.
4. Adjust credit terms: Move from open credit terms to pro-forma cash terms, bank guarantees, or personal director guarantees prior to delivering additional goods or services.
5. Implement daily monitoring: Establish free company monitoring to track subsequent filing changes, officer appointments, or petition updates in real time.
Commercial scenario: Trade credit exposure
Consider a commercial vehicle maintenance provider servicing a waste transport fleet under a recurring service contract. If a compulsory petition has been presented against the fleet operator, bank payments received by the service provider after the presentation date could be reclaimed by an appointed liquidator under Section 127 if a winding-up order is ultimately granted. To protect cash flow, the service supplier must check whether the debtor has secured a court validation order or adjust supply terms immediately. Financial advisers reviewing debt structures frequently analyze HMRC winding-up petition notices alongside charges registers to evaluate preferential creditor distribution order.
How to conduct a winding up petition search
Credit risk teams and legal professionals traditionally verify corporate solvency risks by cross-referencing multiple public platforms, including Companies House filings, cause lists, and statutory public notices.
Using Corp Intel consolidates this investigative process into an integrated research workflow. Executing an immediate winding up search allows practitioners to verify active High Court petitions, court registries, and historic winding-up orders instantly.
To conduct rigorous due diligence, advisers should follow these investigative steps:
- Execute a targeted winding up search to identify active petitions registered across High Court and regional court cause lists.
- Verify court listings against the official roll to confirm legal representation and formal party details.
- Run a comprehensive winding up petition search before executing significant supply contracts or extending uncollateralised commercial credit.
For conveyancers, lawyers and lenders
Conveyancers, corporate solicitors, and commercial lenders must complete insolvency verifications prior to loan drawdowns, property transaction completions, and major commercial agreements. Failing to identify a pending court petition can lead to void asset transfers under Section 127, loss of priority behind debenture holders, and unrecoverable capital losses. Conducting a timely winding up search provides complete risk visibility before credit approvals or transaction completions are executed.
FAQ
What occurs during a High Court winding-up petition hearing?
The High Court judge examines submissions from the petitioning creditor, the company, and any supporting or opposing creditors. The court may grant a winding-up order, dismiss the petition if the debt is discharged or genuinely disputed on bona fide grounds, or adjourn the proceedings for further evidence.
Can a company continue trading while a petition is pending?
A company remains legally active while a petition is pending. However, Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 renders property dispositions made after the presentation date void if a winding-up order is subsequently made, unless validated by court order.
How do creditors support or oppose a pending petition?
Creditors wishing to support or oppose a petition must file a formal notice of intention to appear under Rule 7.16 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 with the court prior to the hearing date.
What is the legal effect of a court validation order under Section 127?
A court validation order confirms that specific payments or asset dispositions made after a petition presentation date are valid, preventing a liquidator from clawing back funds if a compulsory liquidation order is granted.
How does a pending petition impact commercial credit agreements?
Suppliers and lenders typically restrict trade credit upon learning of a petition, shifting to pro-forma cash payment terms or requiring cash guarantees, as unsecured credit extended post-presentation carries high non-recovery risk.
How can counterparties verify pending court petitions?
Counterparties can search published court lists and execute a winding up petition search to verify active petition filings across England and Wales courts.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.