High Court Lists Winding-Up Petition for Sigma Electrical Contracts (N.E) Limited
A winding-up petition presented against Sigma Electrical Contracts (N.E) Limited (company number 06289265) has been listed for hearing at the High Court of Justice. The matter, registered under case number CR-2026-004996, is scheduled to be heard on 12 August 2026 at 11:00 am in Court 1 of the Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London. The petition falls under the jurisdiction of the High Court's Insolvency and Companies List (Chancery Division).
Hearing details
The hearing has been scheduled as follows on the published court cause list:
| Attribute | Detail |
| :--- | :--- |
| Court | High Court of Justice, Insolvency and Companies List |
| Venue | Rolls Building, Court 1, Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1NL |
| Hearing Date & Time | 12 August 2026 at 11:00 am |
| Case Number | CR-2026-004996 |
| Company Name | Sigma Electrical Contracts (N.E) Limited |
| Company Number | 06289265 |
| Statutory Basis | Winding-up petition under s.122(1)(f) Insolvency Act 1986 |
Company snapshot
Sigma Electrical Contracts (N.E) Limited is an active private limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales. Details regarding its corporate registration can be inspected via the Companies House register or through the Sigma Electrical Contracts (N.E) Limited profile page.
Counterparties conducting risk assessments should examine the company's public filings made under the Companies Act 2006. Particular attention should be paid to outstanding or satisfied secured debt. A comprehensive company charge check can confirm whether debentures, fixed charges over trade property, or floating charges over general assets have been registered under Section 859A of the Act.
Directors and ownership
Public filings maintained at Companies House document the active directors and persons with significant control (PSCs) registered under Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006. Commercial credit controllers routinely verify statutory filings to ensure that notices served to officers match the recorded service addresses and control structures on file.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
Winding-up petitions presented in the High Court are subject to advertisement rules under Rule 7.10 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016. Statutory notices are published in The Gazette prior to the hearing date unless the court orders otherwise. Counterparties should verify whether any formal notices have been gazetted or if filing extensions have been registered with the registrar of companies.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
When a petition is presented against a trade counterparty, commercial exposure changes significantly due to the statutory provisions governing corporate insolvency.
The impact of Section 127
Under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of company property made after the date of presentation of the petition is void if the court subsequently grants a winding-up order. This creates immediate transactional risk for counterparties:
- Bank Accounts: Financial institutions typically freeze corporate bank accounts upon learning of an advertised petition to prevent facilitating void transactions.
- Suppliers: Goods delivered on credit after the petition date may result in unsecured claims if payment transactions are later set aside.
- Payments Received: Payments made by the company to trade creditors after the petition presentation date can be reclaimed by a court-appointed liquidator unless a validation order is granted under Section 127 by the High Court.
Worked scenario
Consider an electrical equipment Wholesaler supplying £25,000 worth of cable and distribution boards to an electrical contractor on standard 30-day credit terms. If a winding-up petition is presented on 1 July and the contractor pays the £25,000 invoice on 15 July, that transaction occurs post-presentation. If the court grants a winding-up order at the hearing on 12 August, the liquidator can demand that the wholesaler return the £25,000 to the liquidation estate under Section 127, leaving the wholesaler as an unsecured creditor for the full balance.
Practical risk-mitigation framework
Commercial counterparties should apply the following decision framework upon identifying a petition on the court lists:
1. Immediate Term Change: Switch ongoing trade to cash-on-delivery (COD) or pro-forma terms to prevent creating new post-petition unsecured debt.
2. Retention of Title (ROT): Audit contracts to confirm whether valid Retention of Title clauses exist and prepare inventory schedules to identify supplied goods on site.
3. Cross-Entity Check: Conduct a broader winding up petition search across parent entities, subsidiaries, and key connected directors.
4. Court List Verification: Monitor the daily proceedings via today's cause list and the broader High Court official roll to confirm whether the petition is heard, adjourned, or dismissed.
5. Automated Alerting: Set up free company monitoring to receive immediate email updates on filing status changes, charge registrations, or gazette notices.
How to investigate further
Corporate intelligence professionals traditionally review multiple manual sources to track court petitions, including calling the Chancery Cause List room, monitoring Companies House WebCHeck, and searching insolvency rolls published by the Insolvency Service.
Corp Intel centralises this workflow by ingesting cause list updates, Companies House filings, charge registrations, and Gazette advertisements into a unified monitoring platform, enabling credit management teams to assess counterparty risk before formal orders are sealed.
FAQ
Does a winding-up petition mean the company is insolvent?
No. A winding-up petition is an application made by a creditor alleging that the company cannot pay its debts as they fall due under Section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Insolvency is determined by the court at the hearing.
What happens if the debt is paid before the hearing date?
If the petitioning creditor's debt is settled prior to the hearing, the petitioner may apply to withdraw the petition. However, other creditors can choose to substitute themselves as the petitioner under Rule 7.17 of the Insolvency Rules 2016 if they remain unpaid.
How does a validation order protect transactions?
A company facing a petition can apply to the High Court for a validation order under Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. A validation order sanctions specific transactions, such as paying staff wages or critical trade suppliers, preventing those dispositions from being declared void if a winding-up order is later made.
Where can creditors inspect upcoming court listings?
Creditors can inspect daily hearing lists directly via the High Court cause list or through Corp Intel's dedicated tracking tools for insolvency proceedings.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.