Insolvency Court Hearing Listed: Papillon Restaurant Ltd (CR-2026-002823)
A hearing concerning Papillon Restaurant Ltd has been scheduled for 13 July 2026 at 10:30am. The matter, proceeding under case number CR-2026-002823, is listed as an application to be heard remotely via MS Teams before the Insolvency and Companies Court.
For legal professionals, insolvency practitioners, and creditors, tracking post-appointment applications is essential for understanding the trajectory of a liquidation. Because this company is already formally in liquidation, this hearing does not represent a new winding-up petition. Instead, it indicates a specific legal intervention required during the winding-up process under the Insolvency Act 1986.
Hearing Details
| Detail | Information |
|:---|:---|
| Case Name | Papillon Restaurant Ltd |
| Case Number | CR-2026-002823 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Date | 13 July 2026 |
| Time | 10:30am |
| Venue | Remotely via MS Teams |
| Case Type | Application |
Company Snapshot
Papillon Restaurant Ltd is a private limited company incorporated on 10 May 2018, operating under SIC code 56101 (Licensed restaurants). According to the Companies House register, the entity's status is currently listed as 'Liquidation'.
| Corporate Detail | Information |
|:---|:---|
| Company Number | 11354231 |
| Registered Office | Gill House 140, Holyhead Road, Birmingham, B21 0AF |
| Incorporation Date | 10 May 2018 |
| Current Status | Liquidation |
The registered office address is shared with several other entities. This is a standard indicator that the company is utilising a professional service firm or insolvency practitioner's office for statutory correspondence following the cessation of trade.
Expert Analysis: Applications Within Liquidation
When a company enters liquidation, the powers of the directors cease, and the appointed liquidator takes control of the estate to realise assets and distribute funds to creditors. However, the liquidator's statutory powers sometimes require judicial oversight or enforcement.
An "application" listed before the Insolvency and Companies Court for a company already in liquidation typically falls into one of three categories:
1. Directions: A liquidator seeking guidance from the court on a complex point of law or asset distribution (e.g., under s.112 or s.168 of the Insolvency Act 1986).
2. Antecedent Transactions: The liquidator applying to reverse transactions made prior to insolvency, such as preferences (s.239) or transactions at an undervalue (s.238).
3. Creditor Disputes: A creditor challenging the liquidator's decision to reject a proof of debt, or challenging the office-holder's remuneration.
Worked Example: The Anatomy of a Post-Appointment Application
To understand why a case like CR-2026-002823 appears on the cause list, consider a standard composite scenario.
A hospitality business enters compulsory liquidation. During the initial investigation, the liquidator discovers that three months prior to the winding-up order, the company transferred a significant piece of catering equipment to a connected third party for a nominal sum. The liquidator writes to the third party demanding the return of the asset. When the third party refuses, the liquidator files an application with the Insolvency and Companies Court under s.238 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (transaction at an undervalue). The court lists the application for a hearing to determine whether the asset must be restored to the liquidation estate for the benefit of all creditors.
Creditor Decision Framework
If you are a supplier, lender, or counterparty to a company that has entered liquidation and is now subject to court applications, follow this immediate action plan:
- Verify the Office-Holder: Check The Gazette for the original notice of appointment to confirm the identity and contact details of the liquidator.
- Submit a Proof of Debt: Ensure your claim is formally lodged with the liquidator. If an application results in a successful asset recovery, only creditors with submitted proofs will participate in any subsequent dividend.
- Assess Security Interests: Professionals conducting due diligence should review company charges on Companies House to identify any registered debentures. Fixed and floating charge holders have priority over unsecured creditors in the distribution waterfall.
- Implement Surveillance: Set up free company monitoring to receive automated email alerts on any new statutory filings, such as the liquidator's annual progress report (Form LIQ03), which will detail the outcome of the court application.
Traditional Investigation vs Corp Intel
Historically, tracking insolvency proceedings required manual, repetitive work. A solicitor or credit controller would have to monitor the daily HMCTS cause lists, cross-reference the company name against the Companies House register to confirm its status, pull the filing history to find the liquidator's details, and search The Gazette for the original resolution dates.
Corp Intel consolidates this fragmented data. Instead of manually checking disparate government portals, professionals use our winding up petition search to instantly identify historical petitions, active court applications, and gazetted insolvency notices across the UK. This allows credit risk teams to map a company's entire litigation and insolvency footprint in seconds, ensuring they never miss a critical hearing or dividend deadline.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. The listing of an application is not a determination of liability or misfeasance; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.
***
Ready to streamline your insolvency tracking? Search the complete UK court cause lists and monitor your ledger automatically with Corp Intel's suite of intelligence tools.