GSJP Civil Engineering Faces Winding-Up Petition
A winding-up petition was presented against Dorset-based contractor GSJP Civil Engineering Limited on 1 October 2026 at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions under case reference CR-2026-007570. The filing represents the earliest formal public indicator of legal proceedings initiated against the company under the Insolvency Act 1986. Presentation of a petition is a procedural step by a creditor and does not constitute a judicial determination of insolvency or guarantee that a winding-up order will be made.
Petition details
The petition was recorded on the High Court CE-File management system on 1 October 2026.
| Detail | High Court Record |
| --- | --- |
| Company Name | GSJP Civil Engineering Limited |
| Company Number | 11678534 |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-007570 |
| Presentation Date | 1 October 2026 |
| Filing Court | Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions |
| Case Type | Companies - Petition - Winding Up Petition |
Note: The Central Registry record shows the procedural court filing but does not state the identity of the petitioning creditor or the monetary debt alleged.
Company snapshot
According to the Companies House register, GSJP Civil Engineering Limited was incorporated on 15 November 2018. The company's status remains listed as active. Its registered office is situated at Beacon Hill Farm, Old Wareham Road, Corfe Mullen, Dorset, England, BH21 3RZ.
The business is classified under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 41100 (Development of building projects), 42990 (Construction of other civil engineering projects not elsewhere classified), and 74902 (Other professional, scientific and technical activities). Detailed turnover and financial statement figures for the latest accounting period are not stated in the published source.
Further filings and corporate details can be inspected directly on the company's Corp Intel profile for GSJP Civil Engineering Limited.
Directors and ownership
Public filings on the Companies House register record the following management structure and control history:
Active Directors:
- Mr George Stephen James Parker: Director (appointed 15 November 2018, British, born November 1997).
Resigned Directors:
- Mr Martin Chaldecott: Director (appointed 1 May 2025, resigned 19 May 2026).
- Mr Matthew Connor: Director (appointed 1 May 2025, resigned 2 January 2026).
- Mr Jake William Simpson: Director (appointed 1 May 2025, resigned 25 August 2026).
Persons with Significant Control (PSC):
- Gsjp South Limited (Company Number 12397977): Corporate PSC (notified 2 March 2020), holding 75% to 100% of shares and voting rights, with the power to appoint and remove directors.
- Mr George Stephen James Parker: Individual PSC (notified 15 November 2018, ceased 2 March 2020).
The facts above reflect entries recorded on the public register. The statutory filings do not link named individuals or corporate entities to the petition filing itself.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
No notices regarding this filing have been published in The Gazette as of the report date. Statutory advertisement typically follows formal service of the petition on the company, in accordance with the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
The presentation of a winding-up petition activates statutory restrictions under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Section 127 provides that any disposition of company property, transfer of shares, or alteration in member status made after the petition presentation date is void unless retrospectively validated by court order.
Commercial counterparties typically re-examine operational exposure when a High Court petition is identified:
- Lenders and Financial Institutions: Commercial banks frequently freeze company trading accounts upon discovering a petition to avoid exposure to section 127 clawback claims.
- Subcontractors and Suppliers: Extending trade credit or delivering materials post-presentation presents risk without a validation order or security.
- Main Contractors: Construction and civil engineering contracts routinely feature insolvency clauses granting termination rights upon a court filing.
Practical risk mitigation framework
When court intelligence indicates a petition presentation against a trade partner, commercial teams should follow a structured review process:
1. Verify Listing Status: Check filings using a winding up petition search or review the daily winding-up petitions list.
2. Audit Financial Exposure: Quantify unbilled work, retention balances, and outstanding invoice amounts.
3. Assess Contract Terms: Review retention of title clauses, termination triggers, and step-in rights under active subcontracts.
4. Automate Monitoring: Set up free company monitoring to receive real-time email alerts on future filing changes or statutory advertisements.
Realistic Scenario: Commercial Subcontractor Exposure
Consider a plant hire subcontractor supplying civil engineering equipment on 30-day payment terms. Upon identifying through a winding up search that a petition was presented on 1 October, the supplier conducts an immediate risk review. Because post-petition payments made by the debtor company risk voidance under section 127 if a winding-up order is eventually granted, the plant supplier off-hires non-essential machinery and requests direct payment guarantees before continuing works.
How to run a winding up petition search
Legal and commercial risk managers rely on early court data to identify distress before formal advertisement. Performing a systematic winding up search provides direct visibility of High Court filings, protecting supply chains and commercial contracts against unquantified credit exposure.
For credit teams and suppliers
Credit controllers and commercial managers handling high-value trade exposure must detect petitions at presentation, weeks before formal advertisement in The Gazette. Relying on published insolvency lists often leaves suppliers exposed to frozen bank accounts and void post-petition transactions. Conducting an immediate court record review and deploying automated daily alerts protects working capital and ensures defensible compliance during counterparty distress.
FAQ
What is the legal effect of a winding-up petition presentation?
Presentation marks the official legal start of compulsory liquidation proceedings. Under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any post-presentation property dispositions or payments are legally void unless the court issues a validation order.
Does presenting a petition mean the company is insolvent?
No. A petition indicates that a creditor has filed a formal claim in court alleging an unpaid debt. The company may dispute the debt, apply for a court validation order, settle the underlying claim, or oppose the petition at the hearing.
How long after filing does a winding-up hearing occur?
High Court winding-up petition hearings are typically listed 6 to 10 weeks after presentation, depending on judicial availability and the time required for formal service under statutory rules.
Why is the petitioning creditor not named in the initial court record?
Initial filings extracted from the High Court CE-File system report case metadata. Details regarding creditor identity and specific debt claims become available when formal court documentation or Gazette advertisements are published.
Disclaimer
This report summarises a petition recorded at the Central Registry of Winding-up Petitions. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.