Gallant Building Services: High Court Hearing Listed
The High Court cause list records an upcoming court appearance involving GALLANT BUILDING SERVICES LIMITED (company number 04042191). Listed under case reference CR-2024-005264, the hearing is scheduled for 4 September 2026 at 3:30pm before the Insolvency and Companies Court, conducted remotely via MS Teams. According to public entries at Companies House, the company's status is recorded as in administration. The listing does not state the specific nature of the application.
Hearing details
The details published on the official roll outline the following hearing parameter:
| Attribute | Cause List Reference |
| --- | --- |
| Company Name | GALLANT BUILDING SERVICES LIMITED |
| Company Number | 04042191 |
| Case Reference | CR-2024-005264 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Date & Time | 4 September 2026 at 3:30pm |
| Hearing Venue | Remotely via MS Teams |
| Listing Type | Application |
Company snapshot
Public entries on the Companies House register state that Gallant Building Services Limited was incorporated on 27 July 2000. Its registered office is listed at 22 Regent Street, Nottingham, NG1 5BQ.
The business is registered under three Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes:
- 43210 - Electrical installation
- 43220 - Plumbing, heating and air-conditioning installation
- 43290 - Other construction installation
The official register records the corporate status as in administration. Detailed financial figures, including turnover and net asset positions, were not stated in the published cause list source.
Directors and ownership
Companies House register entries detail the current and historic officer appointments for the entity. Factual corporate records provide the following profile without asserting any personal involvement in court proceedings:
- Scott Thomas Bithel: Appointed as director on 6 August 2010. The filings record British nationality and UK residence.
- Christopher James Lightbody: Appointed as director on 29 March 2013. The filings record British nationality and residence in England.
Historical records list former officers whose appointments have terminated:
- Edward John Berry: Director from 27 July 2000 until resignation on 19 January 2018.
- Marion Berry: Served as director from 27 July 2000 to 30 June 2012, and as company secretary from 27 July 2000 to 14 September 2017.
- Lee Anthony Bell: Director from 6 August 2010 until resignation on 2 November 2016.
- Paul Price: Served separate directorship terms between August 2010 and June 2016.
- Britannia Company Formations Limited and Deansgate Company Formations Limited: Acted as initial nominee secretary and director respectively on 27 July 2000.
Regarding ownership structure, the Persons with Significant Control (PSC) register lists Gallant Holdings Limited (company number 10113374) as holding 75% to 100% of the voting shares, notified on 12 July 2016.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
Official disclosures for corporate entities subject to court listings typically feature statutory updates published in The Gazette. No recent statutory Gazette announcements were included in the immediate source data for this specific hearing entry.
When an entity enters administration, statutory notices regarding the appointment of administrators and creditor meetings are filed under the framework of the Insolvency Act 1986. Stakeholders tracking formal insolvency proceedings should review both court cause lists and statutory filings regularly.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
For trade creditors, sub-contractors, and commercial partners, a High Court listing involving an entity in administration warrants careful structural management:
1. Verify Statutory Moratorium Status: Under Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986, an administration places a general moratorium on legal steps against the company. Court applications during administration often involve administrative directions, extension requests, or permissions to distribute funds.
2. Review Ongoing Risk Exposure: Outstanding invoices or contracts should be mapped against the corporate entity's current status. Sub-contractors should verify whether work was ordered before or after administrator appointment.
3. Conduct Comprehensive Checks: Relying solely on basic company registers can lead to missed court filings. Running a formal winding up search ensures that any concurrent insolvency applications or winding-up proceedings are identified early.
4. Monitor Register Changes: Creditors should set up proactive alerts. Utilizing free company monitoring allows risk teams to receive real-time alerts when new administrator progress reports or court notices are submitted to the registrar.
For conveyancers, lawyers and lenders
For legal professionals, conveyancers, and commercial lenders, conducting formal cause list searches is a critical risk control prior to completion, debt restructuring, or asset acquisition. Failing to identify active court applications or insolvency orders can result in void contracts under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or unenforceable security interests. Performing an exact winding up search prior to transaction close provides essential documentary defensibility.
How to investigate further
To conduct comprehensive due diligence on Gallant Building Services Limited or review broader market trends, review official public registers including Companies House, statutory publications in The Gazette, and the daily court rolls. You can check the today's winding up petitions list or perform a dedicated winding up petition search to verify pending proceedings across UK courts.
FAQ
What does an application hearing in the Insolvency Court mean?
An application hearing in the High Court Insolvency and Companies Court refers to a procedural or substantive request brought before a judge by administrators, creditors, directors, or interested parties. It does not automatically signify a petition to liquidate the business.
How does administration affect outstanding debts?
When a company enters administration, an automatic statutory moratorium prevents creditors from commencing or continuing legal actions, enforcing security, or repossessing goods without the permission of the court or the appointed administrator.
Why should counterparties perform a winding up search during administration?
While administration protects a company from individual debt claims, ancillary court proceedings or conversion applications to court-ordered liquidation can occur. Conducting a regular search ensures all active litigation and court filings are fully tracked.
Where can official court hearing outcomes be verified?
Court outcomes are recorded in the official court rolls and, where relevant orders are made, published subsequently in statutory notices in The Gazette and filed at Companies House.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.