Felix Restaurants (Warley) Ltd: High Court Winding-Up Petition Hearing CR-2026-004240
The High Court of Justice has listed a winding-up petition hearing for Felix Restaurants (Warley) Ltd. The petition, typically presented by an unpaid creditor under s.123 of the Insolvency Act 1986, represents a formal application for the compulsory liquidation of the company due to an alleged inability to pay its debts.
For counterparties, the presentation of a petition fundamentally alters the legal landscape. Any disposition of the company's property made after the petition date is potentially void unless the court orders otherwise.
High Court Hearing Details
The matter is scheduled to be heard at the Rolls Building in London. Creditors and interested parties should note the following cause list details:
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Number | CR-2026-004240 |
| Company Name | Felix Restaurants (Warley) Ltd |
| Jurisdiction | High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts |
| Hearing Date | 15 July 2026 |
| Hearing Time | 11:30am |
| Court Venue | The Rolls Building, Court 30 |
| Case Type | Winding-up Petition |
Corporate Profile and Discrepancies
Felix Restaurants (Warley) Ltd (Company Number: 10293237) was incorporated on 25 July 2016. According to the Companies House register, the entity's registered office is located at Headley Common, Great Warley, Brentwood, CM13 3HS.
Analysts reviewing the corporate structure will note that the company is classified under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 96090 ('Other service activities not elsewhere classified'). A discrepancy between a trading name indicating hospitality and a generic SIC code often warrants further due diligence, as it may suggest non-core operations, holding company status, or outdated filings.
Expert Analysis: Section 127 and Creditor Exposure
The immediate risk for any supplier or lender dealing with a company facing a petition lies in s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986. If a winding-up order is ultimately made, the liquidation is deemed to have commenced on the date the petition was presented. Consequently, any transfer of assets, including cash payments to suppliers, made after that date is void unless validated by the court.
Banks monitor court lists closely. Once a petition is advertised in The Gazette, or if a bank becomes aware of it through proprietary intelligence, they will typically freeze the company's accounts to prevent void dispositions. This action often paralyses the company's ability to trade.
Composite Worked Example: The Unsecured Supplier
Consider a composite scenario where a wholesale food supplier continues to deliver goods to a restaurant company unaware that a winding-up petition was presented three weeks prior. The restaurant pays £15,000 for these deliveries. At the hearing, a winding-up order is made, and the Official Receiver is appointed.
Because the £15,000 payment was made post-petition, it constitutes a void disposition. The liquidator will demand the supplier repay the £15,000 to the insolvency estate. The supplier loses the cash and must join the back of the queue as an unsecured creditor for the original debt, typically recovering pennies in the pound.
Immediate Action Checklist for Counterparties
Professionals advising creditors or suppliers of Felix Restaurants (Warley) Ltd should execute the following risk mitigation steps immediately:
1. Halt Unsecured Credit: Suspend further supply of goods or services on credit terms pending clarification of the company's solvency.
2. Audit Recent Payments: Identify any payments received from the company since the petition presentation date. Ring-fence these funds, as they may be subject to a liquidator's clawback claim.
3. Review Security Position: Execute a company charge check to determine if your debt is secured, and to identify which institutional lenders hold fixed or floating charges over the company's assets.
4. Assess Retention of Title (RoT): If goods have been supplied but not paid for, review contractual RoT clauses and arrange an immediate site visit to identify and inventory your stock.
5. Consider Court Representation: Determine whether your firm should file a notice of intention to appear at the hearing, either to support or oppose the petition.
Modernising Corporate Intelligence
Historically, credit controllers and solicitors tracked insolvency risks by manually checking The Gazette, calling the Insolvency Service, or waiting for a statutory notice to arrive by post. This reactive approach leaves a dangerous gap between a petition being presented and a creditor finding out, exposing them to severe s.127 risks.
Corporate intelligence professionals now automate this process. By using consolidated data platforms, analysts can run a winding up petition search to identify unadvertised petitions long before they hit the public domain. Furthermore, setting up automated alerts allows credit teams to monitor a UK company free, ensuring they receive immediate notifications if a client's risk profile changes, rather than relying on manual periodic reviews.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published High Court cause list. The presentation of a winding-up petition is not a legal determination of insolvency; the outcome remains a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly on the cause list should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.