Emerald Properties Limited: High Court Insolvency Application Hearing (CR-2016-001271)
Emerald Properties Limited (Company Number 01698154) is scheduled for an application hearing in the High Court of Justice (Insolvency and Companies Court) on 21 July 2026 at 14:00. Listed under case number CR-2016-001271, the matter will be heard remotely via Microsoft Teams.
For creditors, lenders, and property sector counterparties, an application hearing requires immediate review. Counterparties must determine whether the hearing stems from a disputed debt, an injunction to restrain advertisement, or a procedural challenge under the Insolvency Act 1986.
Hearing details
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Name | Emerald Properties (London) Limited |
| Case Number | CR-2016-001271 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Date | 21 July 2026 |
| Time | 14:00 |
| Venue | Remotely via MS Teams |
| Hearing Type | Application |
Expert analysis: Interpreting application hearings
Unlike a standard winding-up petition list, an application hearing does not automatically mean a company is facing imminent liquidation. Applications are interim procedural steps. Crucially, the case number CR-2016-001271 dates back to 2016. A 2026 hearing on a decade-old case number typically indicates the revival of a dormant dispute, a long-running costs assessment, or an application to enforce or set aside an older judgment.
Solicitors and insolvency practitioners reviewing this listing must establish whether the application is offensive or defensive. A common defensive application is an injunction to prevent a creditor from advertising a winding-up petition in The Gazette. If a company disputes a debt on substantial grounds, it will apply to the court to restrain advertisement, as publicising the petition would freeze its bank accounts under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
Company profile and asset security
Emerald Properties Limited was incorporated on 10 February 1983. Operating under SIC code 68209 (Other letting and operating of own or leased real estate), the business has a 40-year history in the London property market. Its registered office is 24 Priory Terrace, London, NW6 4DH.
Public records at Companies House classify the firm as a small entity. For property companies of this age, the primary concern for unsecured creditors is the extent of secured debt. A comprehensive company charge check is essential to identify existing fixed and floating charges. These charges dictate the hierarchy of payouts should the company eventually enter formal insolvency, as secured lenders with a qualifying floating charge hold the power to appoint an administrator.
Worked example: Assessing counterparty risk
Consider a composite scenario where a commercial contractor is negotiating a £50,000 refurbishment contract with a property holding company listed for an insolvency application. Upon discovering the hearing on the daily cause list, the contractor's credit control team pauses the contract execution.
They pull the latest micro-entity accounts to check the ratio of current assets to liabilities falling due within one year. They then search the court register to confirm if a formal petition exists. Finding that the application is merely a historical dispute over a 2016 legal costs order rather than a new HMRC enforcement action, the contractor proceeds but requests 50% payment upfront. This demonstrates how contextualising a court listing prevents unnecessary loss of business while protecting cash flow.
Decision framework: Responding to a cause list entry
Counterparties exposed to Emerald Properties Limited should follow this protocol to quantify their risk:
1. Verify the Petition Status: Execute a winding up petition search to determine if there is an active petition underlying the application.
2. Review Security and Charges: Examine the Companies House mortgage register for recent MR01 (registration of charge) or MR04 (satisfaction of charge) filings to see if the company has recently refinanced or pledged new assets.
3. Establish Automated Tracking: Set up free company monitoring to receive immediate alerts if the company's status changes from 'active' to 'liquidation' or if new gazette notices appear.
4. Assess Ledger Exposure: Calculate total outstanding invoices, work-in-progress, and any unbilled disbursements tied to the entity.
Traditional due diligence vs Corp Intel
Traditionally, credit controllers and paralegals monitor insolvency risk manually. This involves checking the daily Royal Courts of Justice cause lists in PDF format, cross-referencing company numbers on WebCHeck, searching The Gazette for notices, and phoning the Insolvency Service to check for unpublished petitions. This fragmented approach is time-consuming and prone to human error, particularly when case names differ slightly from registered company names (as seen with 'Emerald Properties (London) Limited' on the court list versus 'Emerald Properties Limited' at Companies House).
Corp Intel consolidates this process. By aggregating High Court cause lists, Companies House filings, and Gazette notices into a single searchable dataset, professionals can instantly map a company's litigation and financial risk. Instead of manually checking PDFs every afternoon, users receive automated alerts the moment a monitored client or supplier appears on a court list or files new security.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition or an application hearing is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.