DSPEM Ltd Winding-Up Petition Listed in High Court
The High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) has listed a winding-up petition hearing regarding DSPEM Ltd under case number CR-2026-005461 for 2026-09-02 at 12:00 pm in Court 1 of the Rolls Building, London. The published court listings confirm that the application is being heard in the Companies Winding Up list. Professionals monitoring commercial counterparty exposures can review today's court cause list or consult the wider official court cause list to inspect active petition filings across England and Wales.
Hearing details
The hearing parameters published on the official cause list are summarised below:
| Detail | Record |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | DSPEM LTD (formerly PEMD LTD) |
| Company Number | 13208399 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-005461 |
| Court Jurisdiction | High Court of Justice, Chancery Division (Companies Winding Up) |
| Hearing Venue | Rolls Building, Court 1 |
| Hearing Date & Time | 2026-09-02 at 12:00 pm |
| Case Type | Winding Up Petition |
Company snapshot
DSPEM LTD (Company Number 13208399) was incorporated on 17 February 2021, initially under the registered name PEMD LTD. According to the Companies House register, the company's registered office address is 36A Melville Road, Maidstone, Kent, England, ME15 7UR. The company is classified under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 78300, which covers human resources provision and management functions.
Official corporate filings indicate that the current statutory status of DSPEM LTD is "active - proposal to strike off". Turnover and net asset figures are not stated in the published source data. Under section 1000 of the Companies Act 2006, compulsory strike-off action is initiated by the Registrar of Companies when there is reasonable cause to believe that an entity is no longer active or carrying on business.
Directors and ownership
Public filings on the Companies House register record the officer and ownership records for DSPEM LTD. The board of directors currently comprises one active officer:
- Mr Fernando Manuele Tavares Rodrigues (Portuguese national, resident in England, born June 1971), appointed as a director on 2 January 2025.
Previous directorships noted on the statutory register include:
- Mr Dev Sharma (Indian national, resident in England, born October 2004), who served as a director from 30 December 2024 until resigning on 2 January 2025.
- Mr Ajay Mohan Kapur (British national, resident in England, born April 1972), who held office from incorporation on 17 February 2021 until resigning on 30 December 2024.
In respect of ownership control, the register of Persons with Significant Control (PSCs) records three historical entries, each holding 75% or more of shares and voting rights alongside the right to appoint or remove directors:
- Mr Ajay Mohan Kapur (notified 17 February 2021, ceased 31 December 2021);
- Plmd Operations Ltd (Company Number 13579623, notified 31 December 2021, ceased 1 January 2025); and
- Mr Dev Sharma (notified 1 January 2025, ceased 2 January 2025).
All names and roles are reported purely as factual public register entries. These records do not state or imply any connection between named individuals or corporate entities and the presented petition.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
A statutory notice regarding the winding-up petition was published in The Gazette on 20 August 2026 under notice type "winding_up". The notice references High Court case CR-2026-005461 and concerns DSPEM LTD under the Insolvency Act 1986.
The coexistence of an active strike-off proposal alongside High Court winding-up proceedings creates a specific procedural situation. Where a winding-up petition is presented against a company subject to strike-off action, creditors or petitioning parties typically request a suspension of the strike-off to enable the High Court to determine the petition or issue a winding-up order under section 122 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties
When a company appears on the court list for a winding-up petition, commercial counterparties and credit managers should review their current trading exposure. Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 provides that any disposition of company property made after the petition presentation date is void in the event that a winding-up order is made, unless validated by court order.
To manage credit risk effectively, credit controllers and risk officers should consider the following steps:
1. Verify Court Listings: Perform a verified winding up search to confirm current court listing statuses before granting trade credit or delivering additional assets.
2. Review Banking Arrangements: Financial institutions routinely suspend electronic banking access upon reviewing advertised petitions in The Gazette to protect against potential section 127 liability.
3. Assess Retention of Title: Suppliers delivering goods on credit terms should examine contracts for valid retention of title clauses and request payments in advance where appropriate.
4. Set Up Real-Time Monitoring: Implement free company monitoring to track Companies House filings, status updates, and Gazette notices automatically.
For conveyancers, lawyers and lenders
Legal practitioners, conveyancers, and commercial lenders must complete mandatory insolvency checks before executing real estate transactions, advancing credit, or completing M&A deals. Failing to perform a timely winding up search prior to completion leaves transactions exposed to total voidance under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 if a petition has been presented. Running an exact-match winding up petition search ensures thorough risk mitigation before releasing funds or signing contracts.
How to investigate further
Commercial analysts and legal advisors should cross-reference entries on the Companies House register, notices in The Gazette, and cause lists at the High Court. To complete a comprehensive background check, run a instant winding up petition search across official corporate records.
FAQ
What is a High Court winding-up petition hearing?
A winding-up petition hearing is a High Court proceeding where a judge reviews an application, usually presented by a creditor, seeking the compulsory liquidation of a company under section 122 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The court may grant an order, dismiss the petition, or adjourn the matter.
How does a strike-off proposal interact with a winding-up petition?
A strike-off proposal is an administrative action initiated by Companies House when filings are overdue. Conversely, a winding-up petition is a judicial proceeding. When a petition is active, court proceedings take precedence, and strike-off procedures are suspended to allow the court to adjudicate.
What are the implications of section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986?
Section 127 provides that any property disposition, payment, or share transfer made by a company after the petition presentation date is void if a winding-up order is subsequently granted, unless validated by a court order.
How can creditors monitor court list updates?
Creditors can monitor developments by checking published court cause lists daily, reviewing updates in The Gazette, or subscribing to corporate monitoring services for automatic alerts.
Disclaimer
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.