Cause List: Dormant Alexandra Park Limited (CR-2026-001929)
Dormant Alexandra Park Limited (Company Number 02277006) is scheduled for a remote hearing before the Insolvency and Companies Court on 20 July 2026. Listed under case number CR-2026-001929, the matter is designated as an application rather than a petition.
The company, historically active in the pre-primary and secondary education sectors (SIC codes 85100, 85200, 85310), is currently in liquidation. Its registered office at The Chancery, 58 Spring Gardens, Manchester, M2 1EW, indicates that control has passed to professional insolvency practitioners. For creditors, suppliers, and connected parties, an application hearing during an active liquidation signals that the appointed liquidator requires judicial intervention to progress the winding-up.
Hearing details
The hearing will take place remotely via Microsoft Teams, overseen by the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales.
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Dormant Alexandra Park Limited |
| Company Number | 02277006 |
| Case Number | CR-2026-001929 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court (ChD) |
| Date | 20 July 2026 |
| Time | 11:30 am |
| Venue | Remote (Microsoft Teams) |
| Listing Type | Application |
Expert analysis: Court applications in liquidation
When a company already in liquidation appears on the cause list for an 'application', the proceedings typically involve the liquidator seeking court directions or enforcing statutory powers under the Insolvency Act 1986.
Common triggers for such hearings include applications under Section 234 (getting in the company's property) or Section 236 (inquiry into the company's dealings). Liquidators frequently use Section 236 to compel former directors, accountants, or third parties to produce documents or submit to private examination when they have failed to cooperate voluntarily. Alternatively, the application may relate to a block transfer of cases if an insolvency practitioner is retiring, or a request for remuneration approval if the creditor committee has not reached an agreement.
For unsecured creditors, these hearings carry material implications. If the liquidator successfully pursues a misfeasance claim (s.212) or recovers assets transferred at an undervalue (s.238), the net estate increases, potentially improving the pence-in-the-pound dividend. Conversely, protracted and unsuccessful litigation depletes the available funds through legal costs.
Realistic worked example
Consider a composite scenario involving an educational services provider in liquidation. The liquidator identifies that high-value IT equipment and proprietary curriculum software were transferred to a connected party shortly before insolvency. The liquidator files an application to compel the return of the assets or their cash equivalent. The subsequent court hearing determines whether the respondent must restore the position. If the court rules in the liquidator's favour, an additional £150,000 is injected into the estate, directly funding the final distribution to unsecured creditors.
Creditor decision framework
Professionals managing exposures to this entity, its directors, or its wider corporate group should execute the following steps to protect their commercial interests:
1. Verify the liquidator's identity: Check the most recent Form LIQ02 or LIQ14 on the Companies House register to confirm the appointed practitioner and their contact details.
2. Review security positions: If you hold a debenture or fixed charge over the company's assets, perform a company charge check to ensure your priority status is correctly registered on Form MR01 and has not been challenged.
3. Audit group exposure: Use a winding up petition search to identify whether connected companies, subsidiaries, or common directors are facing concurrent enforcement action.
4. Submit proof of debt: Ensure your claim is formally lodged with the liquidator, explicitly referencing any retention of title (ROT) clauses applicable to goods supplied.
Modernising insolvency monitoring
Tracking post-insolvency litigation traditionally requires significant manual effort. Credit controllers, legal teams, and corporate finance advisers must cross-reference daily PDF cause lists published by HM Courts & Tribunals Service, monitor The Gazette for statutory notices, and repeatedly check Companies House for liquidator progress reports. This fragmented approach often results in missed deadlines for creditor committees or delayed awareness of depleted asset pools.
Corp Intel centralises this workflow. By setting up free company monitoring, professionals receive automated alerts the moment a new court listing, Gazette notice, or Companies House filing appears against a specific entity. This ensures creditors maintain total visibility over the liquidation lifecycle without expending billable hours on manual register searches.
Disclaimer:
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition or application is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.