Director Disqualification Listing: Guaranteed Pest Control Limited

A director disqualification matter concerning GUARANTEED PEST CONTROL LIMITED is scheduled to be heard on 11 August 2026 at 10:30am in Hearing Room 7 of the Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London. Listed in the High Court of Justice, Insolvency and Companies Court under case number CR-2026-002700, the court proceeding follows the entity entering liquidation.

Hearing details

The table below outlines the core administrative and judicial details listed on the published court cause list for this matter:

| Attribute | Detail |

| :--- | :--- |

| Case Number | CR-2026-002700 |

| Company Name | GUARANTEED PEST CONTROL LIMITED |

| Company Number | 11917478 |

| Hearing Date | 11 August 2026 |

| Hearing Time | 10:30am |

| Court Venue | Insolvency and Companies Court, Hearing Room 7, The Rolls Building |

| Proceeding Type | Director Disqualification Court Hearing |

Company snapshot

GUARANTEED PEST CONTROL LIMITED (Company No. 11917478) was incorporated on 1 April 2019. The company's registered office address is recorded on the official register at 15 Horizon Business Village, 1 Brooklands Road, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 0TJ. Statutory records filed with Companies House confirm that the corporate entity status is currently listed as in liquidation.

Where an entity has entered liquidation, routine annual accounts and confirmation statement filings may be suspended or managed directly by appointed insolvency practitioners. Public accounting data for recent financial periods is currently unavailable in standard registry summaries.

Directors and ownership

Under the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, UK companies are required to maintain public disclosures regarding their officers and individuals with significant control (PSCs). In disqualification applications under Section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986), proceedings are typically initiated by the Secretary of State for Business and Trade through the Insolvency Service following an investigation into the conduct of former directors of an insolvent corporate entity.

When a liquidator is appointed, they have a statutory duty under Section 7A of the CDDA 1986 to submit a conduct report to the Insolvency Service regarding all individuals who acted as directors in the three years preceding the insolvency.

Recent filings and Gazette activity

A review of official statutory publications in The Gazette indicates the historical placement of the company into liquidation. Post-liquidation registry updates generally reflect communications from liquidators, statutory notices to creditors, or court applications regarding officer conduct.

Because disqualification claims are brought individually against officers rather than against the corporate vehicle itself, court listings in the Insolvency and Companies Court reference the corporate entity name alongside the application reference CR-2026-002700.

What this means for suppliers, creditors and counterparties

When a business entity enters liquidation and its directors face formal disqualification proceedings, commercial counterparties and lenders face operational and legal risks across connected trading relationships. If an officer is subjected to a disqualification order by the court, they are legally prohibited from acting as a company director or participating in the promotion, formation, or management of any UK company for a period ranging from 2 to 15 years without prior permission of the court.

Risk mitigation protocol for credit control teams

To safeguard commercial interests when a counterparty or affiliated entity enters court proceedings, insolvency practitioners and risk analysts recommend executing the following steps:

1. Run a dedicated winding up petition search across the target company and its direct parents or subsidiaries.

2. Review any existing security interests or mortgages using a company charge check to establish asset priorities.

3. Examine connected corporate directorships across public registries at GOV.UK to identify shared officers with other active trade customers.

4. Set up continuous tracking on key corporate partners using free company monitoring to receive instant notifications of corporate status changes.

5. Formalize credit exposure by lodging formal claims with appointed liquidators where outstanding receivables exist.

Worked scenario: Secondary counterparty risk

Consider a commercial equipment lessor that holds contracts with a trading business. If the managing director of that trading business is subject to CDDA 1986 disqualification proceedings arising from a previous failed venture (such as Guaranteed Pest Control Limited), the trading business will be forced to replace the director immediately upon any court order being made. Failure to replace the disqualified officer would result in the individual committing a criminal offence under Section 13 of the Act, potentially disrupting company governance and triggering contract termination clauses.

How to investigate further

Legal and financial professionals track statutory listings and corporate filings using official registers and real-time intelligence feeds:

Historically, corporate intelligence analysts manually cross-referenced Companies House registers, court rolls, and gazette notices to spot emerging director risks. Corp Intel unifies these disparate data streams, delivering real-time court cause lists, charge updates, and director tracking in a single interface.

FAQ

What is a director disqualification court hearing?

It is a High Court proceeding under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 where the Insolvency Service, acting for the Secretary of State, seeks a court order prohibiting a director from managing UK companies due to unfit conduct.

Does a disqualification application mean a company is insolvent?

Disqualification proceedings typically follow an insolvency event such as liquidation or administration. While the application targets individual directors rather than the company itself, the entity itself is usually already in formal insolvency.

What are the consequences of violating a disqualification order?

Under Section 13 of the CDDA 1986, acting as a director while disqualified is a criminal offence punishable by up to two years' imprisonment and fines. Additionally, under Section 15, the individual can be held personally liable for company debts incurred during that period.

How can creditors monitor director risks across corporate networks?

Creditors can implement automated registry tracking through tools like free company monitoring to identify directorship changes, corporate restructurings, and court proceedings across business counterparties.

Disclaimer

This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.

View the company profile on CorpIntel