Director Disqualification Hearing Listed for Greenleaf Treatments (BHAM) Ltd
A director disqualification proceeding involving Greenleaf Treatments (BHAM) Ltd has been listed for hearing in the High Court of Justice. The matter is scheduled before the Insolvency and Companies Court at the Rolls Building in London on 28 July 2026 at 10:30am under case reference CR-2026-002648. Public court cause lists confirm the hearing relates to director disqualification legislation, which governs corporate governance standards and executive conduct under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
Hearing details
The table below summarises the listing details published on the High Court cause list:
| Attribute | Cause List Entry |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Name | Greenleaf Treatments (BHAM) Ltd |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-002648 |
| Court Division | High Court, Insolvency and Companies Court |
| Venue | The Rolls Building, Hearing Room 10, Fetter Lane, London |
| Scheduled Date | 28 July 2026 |
| Scheduled Time | 10:30am |
| Hearing Type | Director Disqualification |
Company snapshot
According to the official register at Companies House, GREENLEAF TREATMENTS LTD (Company Number 11084611) was incorporated on 28 November 2017. The entity remains active on the register with a registered office address located at Bridge House, 509 Aldridge Road, Birmingham, B44 8NA.
The business is classified under the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes:
- 86220: Specialist medical practice activities
- 86900: Other human health activities
Official filings show the entity was established to provide healthcare and specialist treatment services in the West Midlands region. Where financial accounting records or trading histories are subject to review during disqualification applications, proceedings generally examine the historical conduct of corporate officers, compliance with statutory duties, and financial reporting accuracy.
Statutory framework and legal context
Director disqualification proceedings in England and Wales are governed primarily by the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA). Applications are typically brought by the Secretary of State for Business and Trade or the Insolvency Service following an investigation into officer conduct under s.6 or s.7 of the CDDA.
Under s.6 of the CDDA, the court has a duty to make a disqualification order against a person if it is satisfied that the individual was a director of a company that has become insolvent, and that their conduct as a director renders them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company. Disqualification periods under the statute range from a minimum of 2 years to a maximum of 15 years depending on the severity of the alleged misconduct.
Listing a hearing on the High Court cause list does not constitute a finding of unfit conduct. The applicant must establish the facts before the Insolvency and Companies Court judge, who evaluates witness evidence, accounting histories, and legal submissions prior to making an order.
Recent filings and Gazette activity
A search of official notices published in The Gazette shows no statutory insolvency notices registered against GREENLEAF TREATMENTS LTD. The company maintains an active status on the central public register.
When evaluating corporate counterparties, credit risk managers look beyond active corporate status. A director facing active disqualification proceedings may face statutory restrictions that prevent them from acting as a company director or directly managing a business entity if an order is granted.
Counterparty risk assessment framework
Corporate intelligence professionals and credit managers evaluate counterparties subject to officer litigation through a structured assessment process. When an officer of a counterparty entity faces court proceedings, suppliers should adopt the following decision protocol:
1. Verify corporate structure: Confirm the exact legal entity named in court proceedings against the contracting entity and identify active directors listed on the register.
2. Review existing securities: Conduct a company charge check to identify registered debentures, fixed charges, or floating charges over company assets.
3. Assess credit exposure: Calculate outstanding receivables, unbilled work, and current credit terms extended to the business.
4. Check secondary legal risk: Run a statutory winding up petition search to ensure no concurrent insolvency petitions have been presented against the enterprise.
5. Implement monitoring alerts: Set up continuous tracking via free company monitoring to receive daily updates on court cause lists and statutory registry filings.
Practical scenario: Healthcare supplier credit review
Consider a medical equipment manufacturer supplying clinical supplies on 60-day open credit terms to a healthcare practice. Upon discovering that a key director of the practice is listed for a High Court disqualification hearing under the CDDA, the supplier's credit committee conducts an immediate review.
While the company itself remains active and trading, the risk committee places a temporary hold on expanding credit lines, requests advance payment for new orders, and verifies whether any secondary floating charges have been created. This balanced approach protects operational working capital without prematurely terminating a commercial relationship before the High Court determines the legal matter.
How to investigate further
Investigating court filings and tracking officer litigation across UK registered entities manually requires cross-referencing High Court cause lists, Insolvency Service announcements, Gazette notices, and Companies House records.
Corporate intelligence platforms streamline this workflow by integrating court listings directly with registry updates. You can search live High Court records, check director histories, and run a free winding up petition search using Corp Intel's dedicated company intelligence search tools.
Frequently asked questions
Does a disqualification hearing mean the company is insolvent?
No. A director disqualification hearing relates specifically to the conduct of individual corporate officers under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. While many disqualification applications arise following an insolvency event, the hearing itself is a legal proceeding regarding officer fitness, not an application to wind up or liquidate the company.
Can a director continue managing a company while proceedings are pending?
Yes. An officer remains entitled to act as a company director until the court makes a formal disqualification order or the director gives an enforceable disqualification undertaking to the Secretary of State that takes effect.
What happens if a director is disqualified by the High Court?
If the court issues a disqualification order, the individual is legally prohibited from acting as a company director, taking part in the promotion, formation, or management of a company, or acting as a receiver of company property for the period specified in the order, unless special permission is granted by the court.
Where can trade creditors check for formal court orders?
Formal disqualification orders are registered on the Companies House Disqualified Directors Register and published in official databases maintained by the Insolvency Service and The Gazette.
This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.