Director Disqualification Hearing: Automotive Intelligence Ltd (CR-2026-002572)

A director disqualification hearing concerning Automotive Intelligence Ltd (Company Number 14378500) is listed before the Insolvency and Companies Court. Case CR-2026-002572 will be heard on 21 July 2026 at 2:00 pm in Room 8 of the Rolls Building.

Proceedings of this nature are brought under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986). They follow an investigation by the Insolvency Service into the conduct of directors following a formal corporate insolvency. The court will determine whether the conduct of the individuals involved renders them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company.

Hearing Details

| Detail | Information |

| :--- | :--- |

| Case Name | Automotive Intelligence Ltd |

| Company Number | 14378500 |

| Case Number | CR-2026-002572 |

| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court (High Court) |

| Date and Time | 21 July 2026, 2:00 pm |

| Venue | The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London |

| Case Type | Director Disqualification |

Company Background and Insolvency Status

Automotive Intelligence Ltd was incorporated on 27 September 2022. The company operated within the motor trade sector, specifically under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 45112 (Sale of used cars and light motor vehicles) and 45310 (Wholesale of motor vehicle parts and accessories). Its registered office is situated in Leigh-On-Sea, Essex.

According to the public register at Companies House, the company is currently in liquidation. Consequently, no recent financial statements are available on the public record.

Expert Analysis: The Disqualification Framework

Under Section 6 of the CDDA 1986, the court has a duty to disqualify an individual if it finds their conduct as a director of an insolvent company makes them unfit to manage a company.

For insolvency practitioners and corporate lawyers, a disqualification hearing often signals underlying issues that may warrant further civil recovery action. The Insolvency Service relies heavily on the initial conduct reports (formerly D1 reports) submitted by the appointed liquidator or administrator. If the court grants a disqualification order, the findings of fact can sometimes assist liquidators in pursuing separate claims for misfeasance, wrongful trading, or preference payments under the Insolvency Act 1986.

Furthermore, under Section 15A of the CDDA 1986, the Secretary of State can apply for a compensation order against a disqualified director if their misconduct caused quantifiable loss to specific creditors.

Scenario: Contagion Risk in Supply Chains

Consider a wholesale parts supplier providing credit to a network of regional motor trade companies. If a director of one of their insolvent customers is disqualified, the supplier must immediately assess cross-directorships.

If the disqualified individual holds active directorships in three other solvent client companies, those entities face an immediate governance crisis. The individual is legally barred from acting as a director and must resign immediately. If they continue to act, they commit a criminal offence and become personally liable for the debts of those companies under Section 15 of the CDDA 1986. A prudent credit manager will instantly freeze credit facilities on those connected accounts pending clarification of the new management structure.

Investigative Checklist for Creditors

When a former client or counterparty is subject to disqualification proceedings, credit and risk professionals should execute the following steps:

1. Review the Statement of Affairs: Access the liquidator's initial filings on Companies House to understand the estimated deficiency to creditors and the stated causes of failure.

2. Map Cross-Directorships: Identify all other active corporate appointments held by the respondent.

3. Implement Ongoing Tracking: Set up free company monitoring on all connected entities to receive automated alerts if the director resigns or if new, similar entities are incorporated by related parties.

4. Assess Civil Recovery Prospects: Consult with the liquidator to determine if the evidence presented by the Insolvency Service opens avenues for misfeasance claims that could increase the dividend pool.

Modernising Corporate Intelligence

Tracking director disqualifications and corporate distress manually requires significant administrative effort. Professionals traditionally rely on downloading the daily High Court cause lists at 4:30 pm, cross-referencing names against Companies House records, and manually checking The Gazette for insolvency notices. This fragmented approach delays critical risk mitigation decisions.

Corp Intel consolidates these disparate data sources into a single, searchable platform. Rather than waiting for a company to enter liquidation and its directors to face disqualification years later, professionals use our winding up petition search to identify early indicators of severe financial distress. By automating the extraction of court lists and statutory filings, credit teams and solicitors can map corporate structures and identify contagion risks instantly, ensuring defensible and timely risk management.

Disclaimer

This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition or listing of a hearing is not a final determination of liability or insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies or individuals believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.

View the company profile on CorpIntel