Burton Garden Services Limited: High Court Winding-Up Petition Hearing Listed

Burton Garden Services Limited (Company Number 15676153) is scheduled to appear before the High Court for a winding-up petition hearing on 8 July 2026. The matter will be heard at 12:00 pm in Court 1 of the Rolls Building, London, under the jurisdiction of the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales. The case is registered under reference CR-2026-004073.

For credit managers, insolvency practitioners, and main contractors, the appearance of a supplier or client on the specialist companies winding-up list requires immediate risk assessment and exposure mitigation. A petition presented under the Insolvency Act 1986 typically asserts that a company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due (s.123).

Company Snapshot: Burton Garden Services Limited

Incorporated in April 2024, Burton Garden Services Limited is a relatively recent entrant to the horticultural and landscaping sector. The entity operates under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 81300.

| Statutory Detail | Registered Information |

| :--- | :--- |

| Company Name | Burton Garden Services Limited |

| Company Number | 15676153 |

| Incorporation Date | 24 April 2024 |

| Registered Office | 27 High Street, Horley, England, RH6 7BH |

| SIC Code | 81300 (Landscape service activities) |

| Court Reference | CR-2026-004073 |

| Hearing Date | 8 July 2026 |

Expert Analysis: The Mechanics of Compulsory Liquidation

The presentation of a winding-up petition triggers severe statutory consequences that go beyond a simple court summons. Under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, once a petition is presented, any disposition of the company's property, including any transfer of shares or alteration in the status of the company's members, is void unless the court orders otherwise.

In practice, once a petition is advertised in The Gazette, high street banks and financial institutions will immediately freeze the company's bank accounts to prevent the dissipation of assets. This action effectively paralyses the company's ability to trade, pay staff, or settle outstanding supplier invoices. Creditors must understand that continuing to supply goods or services on credit after a petition has been presented carries an exceptionally high risk of non-payment.

Realistic Worked Example: Contractor Exposure

Consider a regional property developer who has engaged Burton Garden Services Limited for a £40,000 commercial landscaping contract on a new housing estate. The developer has paid a 50% mobilisation deposit for materials and initial groundworks.

Upon discovering the CR-2026-004073 petition listing, the developer's commercial director must immediately halt any further milestone payments. If the court grants the winding-up order on 8 July 2026, the developer becomes an unsecured creditor for the unfulfilled portion of the work. The developer must urgently source an alternative landscaping contractor to prevent project delays, while separately registering their proof of debt with the Insolvency Service or the appointed liquidator. The initial £20,000 deposit is highly unlikely to be recovered in full.

Creditor Action Plan

When a client or supplier appears on the High Court cause list, creditors should execute a standard defensive protocol. Delaying action until the hearing date often results in total loss of the outstanding debt.

1. Quantify immediate exposure: Calculate the total value of unpaid invoices, unbilled work in progress, and any deposits paid for future services.

2. Halt credit facilities: Suspend all ongoing supply of goods or services immediately. Any further trade should be conducted strictly on a pro-forma or cash-on-delivery basis.

3. Review Retention of Title (RoT): If physical goods have been supplied but not paid for, review the terms and conditions to enforce RoT clauses before an Official Receiver is appointed.

4. Assess secured debt priority: Fixed and floating charge holders will be paid out before unsecured trade creditors. Professionals must run a company charge check against the Companies House register to identify any registered mortgages or debentures (form MR01) that will dilute the remaining asset pool.

Manual Verification vs. Corp Intel

Historically, solicitors and credit controllers have spent hours manually cross-referencing daily PDF cause lists from the High Court against individual corporate records. They wait for weekly statutory notices or phone the court registry to confirm if a petition is still active. This manual process creates a dangerous lag. By the time a creditor spots a petition via traditional means, the company's assets may have already dissipated, or the bank accounts may be frozen.

Using Corp Intel, professionals can bypass this administrative burden. Users can execute a winding up petition search to instantly connect fragmented court listings with structured corporate profiles. Furthermore, setting up automated risk parameters allows credit teams to monitor a UK company free. This ensures they receive daily email notifications the exact moment a petition is listed, a structural change is filed, or a statutory notice is published, providing the maximum possible window to recover debts.

Potential Hearing Outcomes

On 8 July 2026, the presiding judge in the Business and Property Courts will review the evidence to determine if Burton Garden Services Limited is cash-flow or balance-sheet insolvent. The court has three primary options:

***

Disclaimer: This report is based on the published High Court cause list. The listing of a winding-up petition hearing is not a formal declaration of insolvency, and petitions are frequently dismissed or adjourned. Companies that believe they have been included in the cause list in error, or whose circumstances have changed, should contact the court directly or email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.

View the company profile on CorpIntel