Burlingtons Group Limited: Winding-Up Petition Hearing Listed at Rolls Building (CR-2026-002740)
Burlingtons Group Limited is scheduled to appear at the Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) in London on 20 July 2026. The matter, listed under case number CR-2026-002740, will be heard at 10:30am in Court 4 of the Rolls Building. This hearing follows the presentation of a winding-up petition, a statutory mechanism under the Insolvency Act 1986 typically initiated by a creditor alleging that a corporate entity is unable to pay its debts as they fall due under section 123.
Hearing details
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Case Number | CR-2026-002740 |
| Court | Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) |
| Venue | The Rolls Building, Court 4, London |
| Date | 20 July 2026 |
| Time | 10:30am |
| Case Type | ICC Interim List |
Corporate profile and statutory position
Burlingtons Group Limited is an active private limited company incorporated on 19 July 2019. According to the Companies House register, the firm operates under SIC code 69102, denoting 'Solicitors'. The company's registered office is situated at 5 Stratford Place, London, W1C 1AX.
As of the date of the court listing, the company status remains 'Active'. However, the presentation of a winding-up petition fundamentally alters a company's trading position. Under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of the company's property made after the commencement of the winding up (the date the petition is presented) is void unless the court orders otherwise. This statutory provision routinely prompts clearing banks to freeze corporate accounts immediately upon discovering a petition, severely restricting the entity's ability to trade or settle invoices.
Expert analysis: The section 127 risk for suppliers
When a company appears on the ICC interim list, counterparties face immediate financial exposure. The primary danger lies in receiving payments that are subsequently clawed back.
Consider a composite scenario typical of corporate insolvencies: An IT infrastructure provider is owed £25,000 by a client and successfully chases the debt, receiving full payment. Unbeknownst to the IT provider, a separate creditor (such as HMRC) presented a winding-up petition against the client two weeks prior. Because the £25,000 payment was made post-petition without a court-approved validation order, it constitutes a void disposition under s.127. If a winding-up order is made at the hearing, the appointed liquidator will demand the £25,000 back. The IT provider must return the cash and rank as an unsecured creditor for the original debt, effectively losing the money twice.
To assess where they sit in the priority of payments if liquidation occurs, analysts must review existing secured debt. Performing a company charge check reveals whether institutional lenders hold fixed or floating charges that will take precedence over unsecured trade creditors.
Creditor action plan
Corporate intelligence professionals, credit managers, and solicitors advising counterparties should adopt a structured approach to mitigate exposure when a client or supplier faces a winding-up hearing:
1. Suspend credit facilities: Immediately halt the provision of goods or services on credit terms until the court's decision is known or a validation order is confirmed.
2. Review security and guarantees: Check the Companies House charges register to identify prior-ranking debentures.
3. Monitor statutory advertisements: Track The Gazette for the formal advertisement of the petition, which must occur at least seven business days after service and no later than seven business days before the hearing.
4. Assess cross-default clauses: Review contracts to determine if the presentation of a petition triggers automatic default or termination rights.
5. Engage legal counsel: If you are a significant creditor, consider whether to file a notice of intention to appear at the hearing to support or oppose the petition.
Modernising insolvency risk detection
Traditionally, credit control teams rely on a fragmented, manual process to track insolvency risk. This involves daily reviews of the High Court cause lists via justice.gov.uk PDFs, running ad-hoc searches in The Gazette, and refreshing Companies House to spot newly registered charges or status updates. This reactive approach often means discovering a petition only after bank accounts are frozen and the s.127 risk has crystallised.
Professionals can bypass this lag using automated intelligence. By running a winding up petition search, analysts identify pending legal actions drawn directly from court data, often before statutory advertisement. Pairing this with free company monitoring ensures that any structural changes-from new MR01 charge filings to Gazette notices-trigger immediate alerts, allowing for proactive credit mitigation rather than retrospective damage control.
***
Disclaimer: This report summarises entries on the published court cause list. Presentation of a petition is not a determination of insolvency; the outcome is a matter for the court. Companies believing they are named incorrectly should email contact@corp-intel.co.uk.