Big Healthcare Limited: High Court Winding-Up Petition Hearing Scheduled
Big Healthcare Limited (company number 09715011) is scheduled to appear before the High Court of Justice in London to face a winding-up petition. The hearing, listed under case reference CR-2026-004000, represents a critical juncture for the Stoke-On-Trent-based healthcare provider. Under the Insolvency Act 1986, a winding-up petition is a severe enforcement tool utilised by creditors seeking compulsory liquidation when a corporate debtor is deemed unable to pay its liabilities.
For credit controllers, suppliers, and legal professionals, identifying these court listings early is essential. Performing a winding up petition search forms a standard part of corporate due diligence, allowing stakeholders to identify active or historical insolvency filings against UK entities before exposing themselves to further credit risk.
High Court Hearing Logistics
The petition is scheduled to be heard at the Business and Property Courts. The procedural details are as follows:
| Detail | Information |
| :--- | :--- |
| Company Name | Big Healthcare Limited |
| Company Number | 09715011 |
| Case Reference | CR-2026-004000 |
| Hearing Date | 8 July 2026 |
| Hearing Time | 11:30 am |
| Court Location | The Rolls Building, Court 1, London |
Corporate Profile: Big Healthcare Limited
Incorporated on 3 August 2015, Big Healthcare Limited operates from its registered office at 4 Bagnall Street, Hanley, Stoke-On-Trent, ST1 3AD.
The private limited company operates within the medical and administrative sectors. Its registered Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes indicate a broad operational scope:
- 82110: Combined office administrative service activities
- 86101: Hospital activities
- 86102: Medical nursing home activities
- 86210: General medical practice activities
Under the Companies Act 2006, company directors bear a statutory duty to manage the company's affairs responsibly and meet strict filing obligations. This includes the timely submission of annual accounts and confirmation statements. When a company faces a winding-up petition, directors must also navigate their fiduciary duties to creditors, as wrongful trading provisions under s.214 of the Insolvency Act 1986 may apply if they continue to trade without a reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation.
Expert Analysis: The Section 127 Risk
The mere presentation of a winding-up petition triggers immediate statutory risks for anyone transacting with the company. Under s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition of the company's property made after the presentation of the petition is void if a winding-up order is subsequently made, unless the court orders otherwise.
Consider a composite scenario involving a regional medical supplies distributor. The distributor delivers £15,000 worth of clinical equipment to a healthcare firm one week after a winding-up petition is presented, unaware of the court filing. The healthcare firm pays the invoice. Two weeks later, a winding-up order is made. The appointed liquidator can demand the £15,000 back from the distributor, as the payment constitutes a void disposition. The distributor loses the goods and becomes an unsecured creditor for the invoice value.
This retrospective clawback risk is why high street banks typically freeze a company's bank accounts the moment they become aware of a petition, effectively halting the company's ability to trade.
Immediate Actions for Creditors
If a client or supplier appears on a court cause list for a winding-up petition, stakeholders must act decisively to protect their position.
1. Halt credit facilities: Immediately suspend any open credit lines or rolling supply agreements to prevent further exposure.
2. Review security and charges: Execute a company charge check to review the Companies House charges register. Identify if your firm holds a valid fixed or floating charge (e.g., registered via form MR01) and assess the priority of other secured creditors.
3. Check statutory notices: Search The Gazette to confirm if the petition has been formally advertised. Advertisement usually triggers widespread account freezing by financial institutions.
4. Implement automated tracking: Set up free company monitoring to receive immediate alerts regarding new filings, changes in directorship, or the appointment of a liquidator.
5. Seek legal counsel: Consult an insolvency solicitor to discuss options for supporting or opposing the petition, or applying for a validation order if ongoing trading is essential.
Traditional Due Diligence vs. Corp Intel
Historically, credit control teams and legal professionals have relied on fragmented, manual processes to track insolvency risks. This involves checking the daily London Gazette, manually downloading PDF cause lists from the High Court, and periodically refreshing the Companies House register to check for new MR01 charge filings. This manual cadence creates a dangerous latency period. Between a petition being presented at court and it being formally advertised, days or weeks can pass. During this blind spot, suppliers continue to extend credit, completely unaware of the s.127 clawback risk.
Corp Intel replaces this manual fragmentation with automated intelligence. By aggregating High Court cause lists, statutory Gazette notices, and real-time Companies House data into a single interface, professionals can monitor their entire ledger effortlessly. Instead of relying on ad-hoc checks, users receive proactive alerts the moment a petition is listed or a new charge is registered, ensuring credit decisions are based on the most current statutory data available.
FAQ
What happens at a winding-up petition hearing?
A judge will review the petition and hear arguments from the petitioner, the company, and any supporting or opposing creditors. The judge may dismiss the petition, adjourn the hearing for further evidence, or grant a winding-up order to place the company into compulsory liquidation.
Can a company trade while facing a winding-up petition?
Trading is highly restricted. Because of s.127 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposal of assets or payments made from the company's bank account may be voided if a winding-up order is made. Banks usually freeze accounts upon discovering a petition, practically halting trade unless a validation order is obtained from the court.
How do secured charges affect a winding-up order?
Secured creditors with registered charges (such as debentures or mortgages) hold priority over unsecured creditors over the specific assets secured. The Insolvency Service or the appointed liquidator must settle the costs of the liquidation and pay preferential creditors before distributing remaining funds to floating charge holders and unsecured creditors.
What is the difference between petition presentation and advertisement?
Presentation is the act of filing the petition at court, which starts the legal process and the s.127 void disposition clock. Advertisement is the public notice published in The Gazette, which must occur at least seven business days after the petition is served on the company, and at least seven business days before the hearing.
How can directors stop a winding-up petition?
Directors must act rapidly before the petition is advertised. Options include paying the debt in full, negotiating a settlement or Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA), or seeking an injunction to restrain advertisement if the debt is genuinely disputed on substantial grounds. Professional advice on how to stop a winding up petition is essential.
***
Disclaimer: This article is based on public court cause lists and does not constitute a determination of insolvency. The outcome of the hearing is a matter for the court.
Ready to protect your ledger from unexpected insolvency risks? Search the latest court data and verify corporate status instantly using the Corp Intel company search dashboard.