H3O Global Ltd Group Structure & Org Chart
Executive summary
H3O GLOBAL LTD (company number 13092008) is an active UK private limited company incorporated on 21 December 2020 under SIC code 64209 (Activities of other holding companies not elsewhere classified). The entity functions as an intermediate holding vehicle within a wider multi-tiered corporate group, sitting directly beneath Boomerang Digital Limited (02993612) and Boomerang Digital Holdings Limited. Downstream reverse entity mapping reveals that H3O GLOBAL LTD holds qualifying control positions across four UK companies, including active operating subsidiary IHL TECH LTD (09926970).
Corporate finance advisers, legal counsel, and onboarding compliance teams scrutinising H3O GLOBAL LTD cannot rely on basic public register lookups to ascertain the group perimeter. A standard query at the statutory registry only reflects the immediate entity and its upstream owners. Visualising the enterprise footprint requires assembling both the upward chain of control and the downstream operational subsidiaries into a unified corporate structure chart.
What a Companies House search shows
A standard search on the Companies House service displays only the direct filings, current officers, and registered people with significant control (PSCs) for H3O GLOBAL LTD. Under Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006, UK companies are legally required to record individuals or legal entities that hold significant control over them. Consequently, statutory filings look strictly upwards to show who controls the target company.
The public register records a single active corporate person with significant control for H3O GLOBAL LTD:
- Boomerang Digital Limited (company number 02993612), registered on 1 December 2023, holding 75% to 100% of shares, 75% to 100% of voting rights, and the right to appoint and remove directors.
The register also details a historical restructuring that took place on 1 December 2023, where three founding individual PSCs ceased control:
- Mr Peter William Hannibal (notified 21 December 2020, ceased 1 December 2023; previously held 25% to 50% shares and voting rights).
- Mr Howard Thomas Gant (notified 21 December 2020, ceased 1 December 2023; previously held 25% to 50% shares and voting rights).
- Mr Paul Newton Harris (notified 21 December 2020, ceased 1 December 2023; previously held 25% to 50% shares and voting rights).
The board of directors reflected an identical transition on 1 December 2023. Mr Howard Thomas Gant (born June 1977), Mr Peter William Hannibal (born May 1959), and Mr Paul Newton Harris (born August 1971) all resigned their directorships on that date. Simultaneously, two new directors were appointed to manage the company:
- Mr Andrew Mark Ludlow (British, resident in England, born April 1965), appointed 1 December 2023.
- Ms Kelly Annette Roberts (British, resident in England, born January 1977), appointed 1 December 2023.
While these statutory records confirm who owns and directs H3O GLOBAL LTD, they provide zero visibility into what assets or trading subsidiaries H3O GLOBAL LTD itself controls. Companies House provides no native mechanism to search downwards from an entity to retrieve its corporate holdings.
What the reverse PSC search reveals: downstream subsidiaries
To map the subsidiary network of an intermediate holding entity, analysts must invert the statutory database. Corp Intel indexes the entire UK Register of People with Significant Control, identifying every registered company that lists H3O GLOBAL LTD as a corporate PSC.
Applying this reverse PSC search method uncovers four downstream corporate holdings connected to H3O GLOBAL LTD. One entity is actively trading with full current register details, while three entities reflect historical control notifications where company names are not retained on the active register.
Downstream subsidiary register for H3O GLOBAL LTD
| Company | Number | Status | Control band | Own subsidiaries |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| IHL TECH LTD | 09926970 | Active | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| name not on current register | 10526893 | Status unconfirmed | 75-100% shares | 0 |
| name not on current register | 13155741 | Status unconfirmed | 25-50% shares | 0 |
| name not on current register | 12157995 | Status unconfirmed | Significant influence or control | 0 |
All four downstream targets record an `own_subsidiary_count` of zero, meaning there are no third-tier operating entities beneath them. The active subsidiary, IHL TECH LTD (09926970), was incorporated on 22 December 2015. H3O GLOBAL LTD maintains complete statutory ownership of IHL TECH LTD within the 75% to 100% shareholding band, giving it total voting governance and operational control.
For the remaining three entities (10526893, 13155741, and 12157995), the absence of active names from current register extracts generally points to dissolved, converted, or strike-off events where historical PSC cross-references persist on the master registry. Due diligence investigations must review archival registry records for these specific entity numbers to verify that historical liabilities or cross-company commitments have formally lapsed.
Who sits at the top: upstream ownership chain
Tracing the ultimate beneficial ownership of H3O GLOBAL LTD requires climbing above its immediate shareholder, Boomerang Digital Limited (02993612). Holding companies rarely exist in isolation; they are typically structured as regional, tax, or operational divisions under a primary parent entity.
By examining the PSC filings of Boomerang Digital Limited, the upstream chain extends to a second tier of corporate governance:
1. Tier 1 (Direct Parent): Boomerang Digital Limited (02993612) holds 75% to 100% of the share capital and voting rights in H3O GLOBAL LTD, alongside full rights to appoint and remove directors.
2. Tier 2 (Intermediate/Ultimate Parent): Boomerang Digital Holdings Limited holds 75% to 100% of the share capital, 75% to 100% of voting rights, and board appointment controls over Boomerang Digital Limited.
Under the statutory guidance issued by the Insolvency Service and the Department for Business and Trade, corporate entities cannot serve as natural Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs) under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017). Professional due diligence teams onboarding H3O GLOBAL LTD must follow this corporate line through Boomerang Digital Holdings Limited to confirm whether any natural person satisfies the 25% statutory beneficial ownership threshold at the peak of the corporate group.
Step-by-step due diligence framework for intermediate holding groups
When evaluating a group structure featuring intermediate holding companies such as H3O GLOBAL LTD, corporate lawyers and credit analysts should execute a systematic five-stage review:
1. Map the Vertical Axis: Ascertain the immediate parent entity, any intermediate holding layers, and the ultimate individual controllers using statutory PSC register guidance.
2. Run Downstream Reverse PSC Inquiries: Interrogate registry-wide PSC indices to identify every trading subsidiary, asset-holding entity, and joint venture positioned below the target company.
3. Review Historic Director Overlaps: Cross-reference past board members against incoming corporate owners. The December 2023 transition at H3O GLOBAL LTD shows an outright change in executive personnel, replacing founding directors with representatives linked to Boomerang Digital.
4. Examine Intercompany Encumbrances: Review whether the parent or intermediate entities have executed debentures or parent-company guarantees that bind subsidiary assets. Practitioners can conduct a company charge check across each identified entity number to assess registered fixed and floating security interests.
5. Institute Continuous Portfolio Tracking: Group perimeters fluctuate when subsidiaries dissolve, merge, or alter share classes. Setting up free company monitoring ensures transaction teams receive automated alerts whenever new charges, officers, or confirmation statements are lodged.
Worked scenario: due diligence during corporate asset refinancing
Consider an institutional debt provider approached by an operating business, such as IHL TECH LTD, to secure asset-backed growth capital. A credit committee evaluating IHL TECH LTD in isolation would note its incorporation in 2015 and active operational status. However, relying strictly on an operating entity's accounts introduces significant credit blind spots.
A prudent lending team examines the parent entity, H3O GLOBAL LTD. By establishing that H3O GLOBAL LTD holds between 75% and 100% of the share capital in IHL TECH LTD, the lender recognizes that operational profits could be distributed upward via intercompany dividends to service group-level debt.
Furthermore, the analyst uncovers that H3O GLOBAL LTD underwent a complete ownership and directorial overhaul on 1 December 2023, passing into the corporate custody of Boomerang Digital Limited and Boomerang Digital Holdings Limited. If Boomerang Digital Limited has registered debentures with an all-assets floating charge containing negative pledge clauses, the operating company's assets might be encumbered or subject to upstream covenant enforcement.
Without a complete corporate structure chart linking IHL TECH LTD to H3O GLOBAL LTD and upward to Boomerang Digital Holdings Limited, the lender could advance funds against assets already pledged to support group-level commitments.
Why the structure matters for commercial due diligence
Corporate structures with holding companies, dormant entities, and operational subsidiaries present distinct risk profiles for corporate counterparties. Understanding entity placement within the H3O GLOBAL LTD hierarchy is critical for four primary practice areas:
1. Contractual privity and counterparty selection
Commercial counterparties must confirm which legal entity executes client contracts. Entering an agreement with an intermediate holding company like H3O GLOBAL LTD (SIC 64209) means contracting with an entity that may possess no tangible operational assets, customer receivables, or direct trading turnover. If services are delivered by IHL TECH LTD, contracting with the holding vehicle without cross-guarantees leaves the supplier exposed to structural subordination.
2. Insolvency and ring-fencing
In corporate recovery scenarios, assets and liabilities are segregated by corporate personality. Creditors of a subsidiary have no automatic recourse to the assets of a holding company, nor can creditors of an intermediate holding entity automatically liquidate operating assets owned by subsidiaries, barring specific cross-guarantees or piercing of the corporate veil. Reviewing the four downstream entities associated with H3O GLOBAL LTD ensures insolvency practitioners can isolate which entities hold operational obligations.
3. Mergers and acquisitions integration
Acquirers evaluating a group must confirm the exact perimeter of share transfers. The historical December 2023 transaction involving H3O GLOBAL LTD, where ownership shifted from Peter William Hannibal, Howard Thomas Gant, and Paul Newton Harris to Boomerang Digital Limited, highlights the necessity of verifying title to shares down to operating entities. Any share transfer of H3O GLOBAL LTD inherently transfers indirect control over IHL TECH LTD and the historical downstream positions in entities 10526893, 13155741, and 12157995.
4. AML and KYC regulatory onboarding
Under UK anti-money laundering regulations, compliance teams cannot onboard H3O GLOBAL LTD without verifying its complete corporate chain. Identifying Boomerang Digital Limited is insufficient; compliance officers must look through Boomerang Digital Holdings Limited to verify whether any individual exerts indirect control under the statutory definitions of the Companies Act 2006.
Manual investigations versus automated group mapping
Legal and compliance professionals traditionally map corporate hierarchies using laborious manual techniques. A researcher logs into Companies House, pulls the target company's latest annual confirmation statement (Form CS01), reads the micro-entity balance sheets, and notes any registered parent entities. They then repeat the process upstream, opening separate filing histories for every holding company discovered.
Uncovering downstream subsidiaries manually is far more challenging. Because Companies House does not index parent ownership across its public search interface, a researcher must cross-reference filed accounts footnotes. If an intermediate holding entity files micro-entity or small company unaudited accounts, it often relies on statutory disclosure exemptions, entirely omitting a complete list of subsidiaries. Furthermore, companies that have closed or undergone corporate changes can drop out of standard annual reports.
Corp Intel resolves this structural blind spot by holding the complete UK Register of People with Significant Control and reversing it. By interrogating every UK corporate filing where H3O GLOBAL LTD or its parent companies are identified as a controlling legal entity, the platform exposes downstream tiers instantly. This automated process replaces hours of speculative manual cross-referencing with a defensible, empirical group map.
Visualising the group: Corporate Org Chart PDF
Navigating multi-tiered holding groups using raw tabular text can obscure critical control connections during client presentations or credit committee briefings. Corp Intel visualises these statutory relationships directly through the Corporate Org Chart PDF.
For a fixed fee of £25, corporate lawyers, credit underwriters, and transaction teams can order an on-demand [corporate org chart](/corporate-org-chart). Generated directly from current and historical entries on the Register of Companies and the statutory PSC register, this dated investigative report provides an empirical map of the upstream parent chain, immediate board members, shareholding control tiers, and downstream subsidiaries. It equips teams with a clear, defensible reference document for AML files and transaction bibles.
For conveyancers, lawyers and lenders
Corporate due diligence cannot rely on surface-level entity profiles when dealing with holding companies like H3O GLOBAL LTD. Whether completing pre-completion M&A verification, fulfilling MLR 2017 client onboarding protocols, or executing credit assessments, omitting a downstream subsidiary search creates unquantifiable financial and structural risk. Confirming upstream ownership while mapping downstream operational entities ensures that transaction security, debentures, and client contracts attach to the correct corporate assets. Order an on-demand [corporate org chart](/corporate-org-chart) before completing your next commercial transaction.
FAQ
What is the primary business nature of H3O GLOBAL LTD?
According to its statutory filings, H3O GLOBAL LTD is registered under SIC code 64209, which designates "Activities of other holding companies not elsewhere classified". It functions primarily as an intermediate corporate holding company rather than an operational trading enterprise.
Who is the ultimate corporate owner of H3O GLOBAL LTD?
Statutory PSC filings show that H3O GLOBAL LTD is controlled by Boomerang Digital Limited (02993612), which holds 75% to 100% of its equity and voting rights. In turn, Boomerang Digital Limited is controlled by Boomerang Digital Holdings Limited, which holds an identical 75% to 100% ownership position.
How many subsidiaries does H3O GLOBAL LTD control?
Reverse PSC analysis indicates that H3O GLOBAL LTD holds qualifying corporate control positions across four UK companies. These include one actively trading entity, IHL TECH LTD (09926970), and three entities whose names do not appear on the active public register (company numbers 10526893, 13155741, and 12157995).
Why are some downstream subsidiaries listed as "name not on current register"?
When a reverse PSC search identifies an entity number where the current active company register contains no live name, it usually indicates that the target company has been dissolved, struck off, or transformed. While the live entity name is absent from active register extracts, historical statutory PSC notifications linking H3O GLOBAL LTD to that company number remain part of the public record.
Why does Companies House not show downstream subsidiaries directly?
The search interface at Companies House only processes data upward. A company's statutory filings reflect who owns and directs that specific company via its PSC register and officer records. The registry provides no direct search filter to identify which other companies an entity owns. Identifying downstream group members requires indexing the entire national PSC register to perform a reverse lookup.