Davos Property Developments: Corporate Structure Chart

Executive Summary

[DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED](/company/13202516) (company number 13202516) functions as a development holding company controlling nine active UK property subsidiaries. The entity is wholly controlled by intermediate holding company T J Morris Group Limited (company number 14276776), with ultimate beneficial ownership resting with Mr Thomas Joseph Morris via a shareholding of 75% or more. For legal, credit, and transactional teams conducting due diligence under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, asset exposure and contractual obligations are segmented across separate property special purpose vehicles rather than concentrated at the parent level.

What a Companies House Search Shows

A standard search on the Companies House register operates strictly from the bottom upwards. When a solicitor, lender, or credit analyst searches for an individual corporate entity, the register returns its statutory profile, filed accounts, confirmation statements, registered office, and its register of Persons with Significant Control (PSC). Under Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006, companies must identify and record the individuals or relevant legal entities that exert significant control over them.

Consequently, inspecting DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED directly on Companies House reveals who controls it, but it does not reveal the corporate assets or operating subsidiaries beneath it. There is no native index or search tool within the standard Companies House interface that lists downstream subsidiaries owned by a parent company. Typing a holding company into the registry search field only displays the company's own records, its directors, its charges, and its parent entities.

The direct public record for DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED shows the following upstream control structure:

The register also details historical control entries. Prior to 26 June 2024, significant control was split between two individual founders, Mr Thomas Joseph Morris and Mr David Stephen Little, each recorded with 25% to 50% of shares and voting rights (notified 15 February 2021, ceased 26 June 2024). Active directorships remain held by Mr Thomas Joseph Morris (born February 1954, appointed 15 February 2021) and Mr David Stephen Little (born April 1976, appointed 15 February 2021).

While this filing history explains the upward chain of control, it leaves transactional teams blind to the operational perimeter below. Unless an investigator already knows the precise legal name of every project company, standard registry searches will not locate the downstream portfolio.

What the Reverse PSC Search Reveals: The Downstream Group

To identify the companies that a parent owns, corporate analysts cannot rely on top-down querying at Companies House. Instead, Corp Intel indexes the entire UK Persons with Significant Control database and performs a reverse PSC search. By scanning every registered UK company to locate those that declare DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED as a corporate PSC, the full downstream corporate structure chart can be systematically reconstructed.

This reverse mapping reveals an extensive portfolio of property development special purpose vehicles (SPVs). DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED controls nine active subsidiaries, each incorporated to hold distinct site developments or regional projects. None of these first-tier subsidiaries currently control second-tier operating companies, indicating a direct, flat subsidiary architecture.

| Company Name | Company Number | Status | Incorporation Date | Control Band | Own Subsidiaries |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| DAVOS (SPEKE) LIMITED | 15511731 | Active | 21/02/2024 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| DAVOS INDUSTRIAL LIMITED | 13184742 | Active | 08/02/2021 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| DAVOS (BLUNDELL STREET) LIMITED | 15526019 | Active | 27/02/2024 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| DAVOS (BALTIC GATEWAY) LIMITED | 15572838 | Active | 18/03/2024 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| DAVOS (AUDLEY STREET) LIMITED | 15998804 | Active | 04/10/2024 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| DAVOS (HILDEN HOUSE) LIMITED | 16076930 | Active | 13/11/2024 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| HOME SIMPSON HOUSE LTD | 16376262 | Active | 09/04/2025 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| HOME FORMBY LTD | 16376526 | Active | 09/04/2025 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

| DAVOS (ONE RIVERSIDE) LIMITED | 16608670 | Active | 28/07/2025 | 75-100% shares | 0 |

Every subsidiary in this portfolio is held at the 75% to 100% ownership tier, establishing absolute corporate voting control by DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED. The naming convention reflects individual real estate assets and sites across the North West of England, such as Baltic Gateway, Blundell Street, and Speke. Tracking these subsidiaries via reverse PSC indexing prevents omission of newly formed development entities that have not yet filed full annual accounts.

Who Sits at the Top: Upstream Chain and Ultimate Beneficial Ownership

Tracing ownership upstream from DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED establishes the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) for anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) compliance under Regulation 28 of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017.

The chain of legal ownership is structured across two distinct corporate layers:

1. Operating Holding Company: DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (13202516), incorporated on 15 February 2021. The company holds SIC codes 41100 (Development of building projects), 68100 (Buying and selling of own real estate), and 68209 (Other letting and operating of own or leased real estate).

2. Immediate Parent / Corporate PSC: T J Morris Group Limited (14276776), which holds 75% to 100% of the shares and voting rights in DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED, notified on 26 June 2024.

3. Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO): Mr Thomas Joseph Morris. The PSC register of T J Morris Group Limited confirms that Mr Morris holds:

This upstream configuration demonstrates clear single-individual control at the head of the corporate tree. While Mr David Stephen Little remains an active director of DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED, his statutory PSC notification ceased on 26 June 2024 when the ownership was consolidated under T J Morris Group Limited.

Why the Group Structure Matters for Due Diligence

Understanding this corporate org chart is critical for legal counsel, commercial lenders, procurement leads, and credit controllers assessing transactions with the Davos group. Property development enterprises routinely adopt ring-fenced structures to compartmentalise asset risk, project finance, and operational liabilities.

1. Contractual Counterparty Verification

In property transactions, a common error is contracting with an intermediate parent company rather than the specific SPV holding title to the underlying land. If a construction contractor or professional consultant executes an agreement with DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED while the real estate asset and development funding reside in DAVOS (BALTIC GATEWAY) LIMITED or DAVOS (SPEKE) LIMITED, the contractor is structurally subordinated. Recourse against the project asset may be unenforceable without a direct parental guarantee.

2. Security, Debt, and Cross-Collateralisation

Commercial lenders extending acquisition or development debt require certainty regarding where liabilities and security interests attach. By performing a company charge check, lenders can establish whether fixed charges, debentures, or negative pledges exist at the holding tier or directly against the individual SPV assets. A clean holding company balance sheet can obscure substantial project-level borrowings or debentures registered against subsidiary entities.

3. Financial Reporting Limits

Statutory accounts filed at Companies House under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 regime may allow small or medium groups to file individual accounts without comprehensive consolidated group statements. Furthermore, filed group accounts can be up to nine months out of date by the time they reach the public register. Companies incorporated recently, such as DAVOS (ONE RIVERSIDE) LIMITED (incorporated July 2025), will not appear on historical filed accounts for several quarters. Reverse PSC analysis provides current visibility into newly added subsidiaries.

4. Group-Wide Exposure and Risk Management

Corporate intelligence professionals cannot treat subsidiaries in isolation. When one SPV faces operational delays, planning disputes, or supplier claims, group-level reputational and financial contagion can occur. Monitoring group-wide corporate changes using free company monitoring ensures that credit managers and panel solicitors receive immediate alerts when directors resign, charges are satisfied, or new SPVs are incorporated.

Step-by-Step Due Diligence Framework for Complex Corporate Groups

When evaluating a group structured around property SPVs, compliance and legal teams should execute a structured verification protocol:

1. Identify the True Contracting Entity: Verify the exact registered company name and eight-digit company number on the draft contract against the registered title at HM Land Registry.

2. Map Upstream Ownership to UBO: Trace corporate shareholdings through intermediate holdings (such as T J Morris Group Limited) until reaching natural persons meeting the 25% statutory ownership threshold under the Money Laundering Regulations.

3. Map the Downstream Group Perimeter: Run a reverse PSC search to uncover all active, dormant, or newly incorporated subsidiaries held by the intermediate parent.

4. Audit Registered Encumbrances: Cross-reference filed charges on the mortgage register for both the parent entity and each subsidiary to confirm existing debentures, legal mortgages, and negative pledges.

5. Screen Officers and Disqualifications: Cross-check active directors across the parent and subsidiary entities against the Insolvency Service disqualified directors register and Companies House records.

6. Establish Ongoing Tracking: Subscribe to automated registry monitoring to catch changes in PSC control, new director appointments, or corporate restructurings.

Case Scenario: The Risk of Structural Subordination in SPV Structures

Consider a commercial contractor negotiating a £4.5 million design-and-build package for a major urban regeneration project. The contractor conducts standard checks on the entity presenting the contract: DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED. The holding company presents strong governance, established directors, and high-profile group backing.

However, the site title and development finance facility actually sit within DAVOS (BLUNDELL STREET) LIMITED. If the contractor signs with DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED without obtaining a direct contractual nexus, a step-in agreement, or a formal parent guarantee, substantial risks emerge:

Conducting a full group structure search prior to contract signature allows legal advisers to identify the asset-holding entity immediately and draft appropriate tripartite agreements or collateral warranties.

Traditional Due Diligence vs. Automated Reverse PSC Mapping

Historically, corporate lawyers and due diligence investigators had to manually reconstruct group structures. The manual process required downloading annual reports, scrutinising the notes to the financial statements for subsidiary disclosures, cross-checking WebCHeck filings, and searching each subsidiary individually to see whether it remained active or had been dissolved.

This traditional approach suffers from three major flaws:

Corp Intel eliminates these gaps by querying the live, central UK PSC register in reverse. By scanning real-time filings, reverse PSC mapping extracts every subsidiary that records the subject company as its controlling entity, regardless of whether annual accounts have been filed.

For Corporate Lawyers, Lenders, and KYC Teams

For transactional solicitors, risk officers, and institutional credit teams, verified entity mapping is mandatory prior to completion. An incomplete corporate structure chart can breach client onboarding regulations under MLR 2017, miss undisclosed cross-guarantees, or leave a commercial lender exposed to unsecured debt. Our detailed corporate intelligence reports provide verified, point-in-time structural evidence for your credit committee or compliance audit file.

Order a dated, comprehensive [Corporate Org Chart](/corporate-org-chart) for DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED for £25. Sourced directly from the Register of Companies and the live PSC register, the report visualises the complete group architecture, full upstream ownership, and all nine active subsidiaries in an audit-ready PDF format.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a reverse PSC search?

A reverse PSC search is an intelligence technique that queries the live Persons with Significant Control register to find every UK company that lists a specific business or individual as its controlling entity. While standard Companies House searches only show who controls a selected company, a reverse search maps all downstream subsidiaries owned by that company.

Who is the ultimate beneficial owner of Davos Property Developments Limited?

According to public filings on the PSC register, the ultimate beneficial owner is Mr Thomas Joseph Morris. He holds between 75% and 100% of the shares and voting rights, as well as director appointment rights, in T J Morris Group Limited, which in turn owns 75% to 100% of DAVOS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED.

Why are property developments split into individual SPVs?

Property groups establish separate special purpose vehicles (SPVs) for individual development sites to isolate commercial, environmental, and financial risks. Ring-fencing each project into its own legal entity prevents liabilities on one site from affecting other developments across the group and allows lenders to take ring-fenced security over specific assets.

Can I find all subsidiaries of a company using standard Companies House search?

No. The public Companies House search function only displays an entity's upward PSC filings, indicating who controls it. It does not provide a downstream directory of the companies owned by that business. Downstream subsidiaries must be identified through filed group accounts (which may be dated) or by performing an automated reverse PSC search across the entire registry.

Are filed accounts sufficient to map a corporate group structure?

Filed group accounts provide useful historical context, but they are often insufficient for active due diligence. Accounts reflect a historical snapshot up to nine months old, small groups may qualify for filing exemptions that omit subsidiary schedules, and newly incorporated SPVs will not appear until the subsequent accounting period. Live PSC register data provides the most current record of corporate ownership.

View the company profile on CorpIntel