CJC NEWCO LIMITED Group Structure & Subsidiaries

Executive Summary

[CJC NEWCO LIMITED](/company/16902565) (company number 16902565) is an active UK holding company incorporated on 10 December 2025, wholly owned and controlled by Christopher John Chadwick. A conventional public register search identifies only the company's immediate ownership, concealing a broader corporate group comprising five first-tier subsidiaries and one second-tier subsidiary. Four of these subsidiaries are currently subject to active strike-off proposals, making a complete downstream mapping critical for legal due diligence, asset verification, and counterparty risk assessment.

What a Standard Companies House Search Shows

A direct enquiry on the Companies House register returns only the statutory details filed directly by CJC NEWCO LIMITED. The company is registered under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 64209 for activities of other holding companies not elsewhere classified.

The register reveals its registered office status, incorporation filing, and its Person with Significant Control (PSC) declarations. These statutory PSC entries disclose the upstream ownership of the company:

Christopher John Chadwick: Notified on 10 December 2025 as an individual PSC holding 75% to 100% of shares, 75% to 100% of voting rights, and the right to appoint and remove directors.
A matching secondary notification for Christopher John Chadwick records identical control bands (75% to 100% of shares, voting rights, and director appointment powers) dated 10 December 2025.

While this filing satisfies the reporting duties under Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006, it reveals nothing about what CJC NEWCO LIMITED owns. Under UK company law, a company's own statutory record points strictly upwards to its direct owners and officers. Companies House provides no native functionality to input a corporate entity's number and generate a list of its operating subsidiaries.

Professionals conducting client onboarding, transaction due diligence, or statutory verification under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 often assume that checking the holding company profile completes the corporate picture. In practice, doing so leaves the entire operational footprint invisible.

What the Reverse PSC Search Reveals: Downstream Subsidiaries

To map the corporate network beneath CJC NEWCO LIMITED, Corp Intel executes a reverse PSC search across the entire UK corporate dataset. Rather than inspecting the target company's filing record, this technique queries the statutory registers of all active and dissolved UK companies to find every entity that has registered CJC NEWCO LIMITED as a corporate Person with Significant Control.

This reverse indexing process identifies five direct subsidiaries controlled by CJC NEWCO LIMITED, alongside a second-tier operating subsidiary held via an intermediate entity. The table below details the downstream corporate structure as recorded on the public register:

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

Multi-Tier Group Architecture

The downstream mapping demonstrates a multi-tier group arrangement. While CJC NEWCO 1 LIMITED was dissolved following its incorporation in 1993, the remaining four direct entities were incorporated between 1997 and 2013, pre-dating the incorporation of CJC NEWCO LIMITED itself.

Notably, CJC NEWCO 2 LIMITED (03394478) is recorded as holding 1 subsidiary of its own. Because detailed PSC filing histories for second-tier entities often omit full historic identifiers or list the name not on current register filings, secondary-tier validation requires cross-referencing intermediate corporate filings. In this group, the total corporate footprint encompasses seven corporate vehicles: the top holding entity, five direct subsidiaries, and one second-tier subsidiary.

Corporate Governance and Ultimate Beneficial Ownership

A rigorous Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) evaluation requires tracing ownership upward to natural persons who exercise ultimate control.

According to Companies House filings for CJC NEWCO LIMITED:

Christopher John Chadwick (born April 1983) was appointed as director on 10 December 2025. His nationality is British, and his country of residence is the United Kingdom.
He is also recorded as the sole individual Person with Significant Control, holding between 75% and 100% of the issued shares and voting rights, together with the unilateral power to appoint and remove the board.

There are no intermediate holding companies or overseas offshore entities positioned above CJC NEWCO LIMITED. The ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) sits directly at the top of the UK register. Consequently, control flows in an unbroken line from Christopher John Chadwick into CJC NEWCO LIMITED, and downwards across each of the subsidiary entities where CJC NEWCO LIMITED holds between 75% and 100% control.

For legal counsel, this concentration of control clarifies corporate authority: board appointments, shareholder resolutions, and corporate authorisations within the subsidiaries ultimately depend on approvals executed by the top-tier entity and its sole director.

Regulatory Status: Active Strike-Off Proceedings

The most critical finding for risk analysts is the filing status of the active subsidiary portfolio. Four active direct subsidiaries are simultaneously recorded as "active - proposal to strike off":

1. CJC NEWCO 2 LIMITED (03394478)

2. CJC NEWCO 3 LIMITED (03966314)

3. CJC NEWCO 6 LIMITED (08819832)

4. CJC NEWCO 4 LIMITED (07814788)

A proposal to strike off is initiated under either section 1000 or section 1003 of the Companies Act 2006. Under section 1000, the Registrar of Companies takes compulsory action if there is reasonable cause to believe a company is not carrying on business or in operation, often following a failure to file annual accounts or confirmation statements. Under section 1003, company directors apply voluntarily using form DS01.

When a strike-off proposal is initiated, a notice is published in The Gazette. If no objection is lodged within two months of the Gazette notice, the company is struck from the register and dissolved.

Implications of Strike-Off for Corporate Due Diligence

When an operating or property-holding subsidiary faces strike-off, counterparties encounter several immediate legal and financial consequences:

Bona Vacantia: Upon statutory dissolution, all property, rights, bank accounts, and leasehold interests held by the company automatically vest in the Crown as bona vacantia under section 1012 of the Companies Act 2006. Unfreezing these assets requires formal restoration via the administrative procedure or a High Court order.
Contractual Frustration: Ongoing commercial agreements entered into by a dissolved entity become unenforceable. Continuing to trade through a dissolved company exposes directors to personal liability.
Loss of Security: Fixed and floating charges registered against a company may become uncollectable or compromised if the underlying legal vehicle ceases to exist before secured creditors register formal objections with the Registrar.
Group Cross-Guarantees: If these subsidiaries have provided cross-guarantees or covenants to support group facilities, strike-off proceedings can trigger technical defaults under loan agreements executed by the parent entity.

Practical Checklist for Corporate Group Due Diligence

When reviewing a group structure that contains holding companies and active strike-off notices, professional advisers should execute the following five-step review:

1. Verify Entity Legal Status: Confirm whether strike-off notices are voluntary (director-led DS01 filing) or compulsory (Registrar action under section 1000 for missing filings).

2. Review Gazette Publications: Inspect The Gazette to identify exact publication dates and calculate the statutory objection deadline before dissolution takes effect.

3. Identify Asset Distribution: Establish which specific subsidiaries hold legal title to physical property, intellectual property, trading contracts, or operational bank accounts.

4. Audit Registered Charges: Search the register of charges for outstanding debentures or mortgages registered against both the parent company and each subsidiary.

5. Lodge Statutory Objections if Required: If unpaid debts, active contracts, or pending litigation exist, submit a formal objection to strike-off to Companies House supported by documentary evidence to halt dissolution.

Due Diligence Scenario: The Hidden Subsidiary Risk

Consider an anonymised corporate advisory scenario that demonstrates why parent-only searches fail.

A commercial lender evaluates a credit application from a newly formed holding company. The applicant presents a clean parent company balance sheet, a single UK-resident director, and no recorded county court judgments or charges against the parent entity. A basic Companies House lookup reveals only an active company incorporated within the last twelve months with standard SIC codes.

However, a reverse PSC search across the corporate dataset uncovers that the holding company has taken ownership of several historic entities established over twenty years ago. Four of those entities are subject to imminent strike-off proposals due to overdue statutory returns. Furthermore, one subsidiary acts as an intermediate holding vehicle for a lower-tier company.

If the lender had advanced funds based solely on the clean profile of the holding company, several operational exposures would have remained undetected:

Key commercial revenues were being generated within subsidiaries about to be dissolved.
The sudden dissolution of the trading subsidiaries would result in frozen bank accounts and assets vesting in the Crown.
Creditors of the subsidiaries could petition the court for compulsory restoration or formal liquidation, involving the group in contentious insolvency proceedings overseen by the Insolvency Service.

By running a full reverse corporate structure search before completion, the lender identifies the strike-off filings, requires regularisation of subsidiary statutory accounts as a condition precedent, and ensures that cross-company security is properly perfected.

Why Group Structure Visibility Matters for Contracts and Lending

Understanding corporate lineage is not merely an academic exercise. In UK commercial practice, legal liability strictly attaches to the contracting entity rather than the wider group, barring rare instances where the corporate veil is pierced.

When negotiating commercial contracts, suppliers and corporate buyers must verify precisely which corporate entity is signing. If a contract is entered into with CJC NEWCO LIMITED, the counterparty holds recourse solely against the holding company's balance sheet, not the underlying subsidiaries, unless explicit parent guarantees or cross-company indemnities are executed.

Similarly, commercial landlords and equipment leasing companies must determine whether the tenant or lessee is a trading subsidiary or a non-trading holding vehicle. Without visibility of the complete corporate tree, counterparties cannot confirm whether parent undertakings are supported by genuine operational assets or merely shell investments.

To explore the regulatory principles governing UK corporate networks, see our detailed guide on [company group structure in the UK](/company-group-structure-uk).

How Corp Intel Solves the Reverse Search Problem

Traditionally, corporate intelligence practitioners and forensic accountants mapped corporate groups by manually reviewing annual accounts filed at Companies House. Under statutory reporting rules, medium and large groups are required to list subsidiary undertakings in the notes to their financial statements.

However, this traditional manual approach suffers from three major flaws:

Filing Delays: Group accounts are filed up to nine or twelve months after the financial year-end, omitting corporate restructuring, acquisitions, or strike-off notices occurring in the interim.
Exemptions for Small Entities: Small and micro groups frequently claim filing exemptions, submitting unaudited abridged or filleted accounts that omit detailed subsidiary schedules entirely.
Omission of Inactive Entities: Dormant or recently acquired subsidiaries are frequently omitted from narrative notes.

Corp Intel resolves this limitation by maintaining an independent index of the complete UK Persons with Significant Control register. Instead of relying on narrative disclosures or manual paper trails, our platform systematically queries every registered corporate entity to identify where the parent company appears as a corporate PSC. This automated reverse search rebuilds the entire downstream hierarchy tier by tier, providing legal teams with a verifiable, real-time snapshot of the complete corporate group.

For Corporate Lawyers and Credit Teams

For corporate finance advisers, banking KYC teams, and commercial litigators, identifying the complete corporate structure is essential prior to transaction completion or credit approval. Relying solely on a holding company's primary Companies House record leaves downstream strike-off notices, historic liabilities, and intermediate subsidiaries completely uncovered. A missing subsidiary link can void a cross-guarantee, compromise asset ownership, or breach mandatory MLR 2017 beneficial ownership checks.

How to Obtain This Structure as an Org Chart

You can order a complete visual corporate org chart for this group or any UK enterprise. The Corp Intel [Corporate Org Chart](/corporate-org-chart) PDF provides a clear visual breakdown of the upstream ownership chain, direct subsidiaries, and intermediate operating tiers, fully sourced from the Register of Companies and the statutory PSC register for £25.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I find subsidiaries of a UK company on Companies House?

Companies House does not provide a search function to list downstream subsidiaries owned by a company. The public register only displays upward ownership via the target company's own PSC register. To identify downstream subsidiaries, professionals must either review subsidiary disclosure notes in filed group accounts or utilise a specialised reverse PSC search tool that indexes every UK company naming the target as a corporate controller.

What does a reverse PSC search do?

A reverse PSC search scans the entire UK Persons with Significant Control register to locate all corporate entities that have registered a specific company as a corporate PSC. This reverses the traditional search direction, allowing investigators to trace ownership downward from a parent entity through multiple subsidiary tiers.

Who is the ultimate beneficial owner of CJC NEWCO LIMITED?

According to statutory filings, the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) is Christopher John Chadwick. He holds between 75% and 100% of the voting rights and shares, along with the unilateral power to appoint and remove directors, exercising direct personal control over the holding vehicle.

What happens if an active subsidiary is struck off the register?

If a subsidiary is struck off and dissolved, its separate legal personality terminates. Any property, cash balances, or intellectual property held by that entity immediately vest in the Crown as bona vacantia under section 1012 of the Companies Act 2006. Any commercial contracts entered into by that subsidiary become unenforceable, and ongoing business operations must cease unless the company is formally restored to the register.

Why are some subsidiaries marked as dissolved while others are active?

Corporate groups frequently retain historic entities that have completed their commercial purpose. When an entity is formally wound up or dissolved following a voluntary or compulsory procedure, its status changes to dissolved on the public register. Active subsidiaries remain live legal entities with ongoing statutory filing obligations until formal strike-off proceedings conclude.

Why are filed group accounts insufficient for mapping corporate groups?

Filed group accounts are historical records reflecting the group position at a specific balance sheet date, often filed many months later. Furthermore, small and micro-entity groups are legally entitled to file abridged or filleted accounts that omit the schedule of subsidiary undertakings entirely. A reverse PSC search reflects the real-time statutory ownership recorded on the public register today.

View the company profile on CorpIntel